Mr. L. F. Ward on Mesozote Dicotyledons. 385 
The next year Geinitz* identified three species in the lower 
Quader of Saxony at Niederschéna, the fossil flora of which 
lace was so well worked up by Ettingshausen in 1867. 
In 1845 Cordat figured some dozen leaves from Trziblitz, 
Luschitz, Perutz, and Weberschan, in Bohemia, some of 
which localities he placed in the Gault, but they are probably 
all in the Lower Quadersandstein, or Cenomanian. He made 
no attempt to refer these forms to genera and species. 
Unger’s ‘ Synopsis’ { appeared the same year, in which 
sixteen species of Cretaceous Dicotyledons are recognized 
down to that date. Gdéppert$, however, admitted only thirteen 
species in his table published in Bronn’s ‘ Naturgeschichte,’ 
which also appeared in 1845. 
Debey||, in 1848, enumerates sixteen species as previously 
published, and adds to these twenty-seven others from the 
neighbourhood of Aix-la-Chapelle, most of which, however, he 
contents himself with calling Phylites ; and as no figures were 
made, it is possible that some of these were not Dicotyledons. 
He also gives four Carpolithes which he identifies with dico- 
tyledonous orders. 
The same year Géppert{] published a supplement to his 
Flora of the Quadersandstein, in which a number of Dicotyle- 
dons are recognized. 
In Ettingshausen’s ‘ Proteaceen der Vorwelt,’ 1851**, four 
Cretaceous species are enumerated, and Von Ottotf in his 
‘ Additamente,’ 1852-54, also described Proteaceze from the 
Quader of Saxony ; while Miquelff, in 1853, described a few 
Dicotyledons trom the Upper Cretaceous of Limburg. 
* “Characteristik der Schichten und Petrefacten des sachsisch-boh- 
mischen Kreidegebirges,’ von Dr. Hans Bruno Geinitz. Heft 3, Dresden and 
Leipzig, 1842, p. 97. 
+ In: ‘Die Versteinerungen der béhmischen Kreideformation,’ yon 
Aug. "im. Reuss. Stuttgart, 1845-46, Taf. 1., li. 
. t ‘Synopsis plantarum fossilium’ autore Fr. Unger, M.Dr., Lipsiz, 
845 
§ ‘ Naturgeschichte der drei Reiche,’ vol. xv. 2 (‘Handbuch einer 
Geschichte der Natur,’ iii. 2), von Heinrich G. Bronn. Stuttgart, 1849, 
pp. 44-57, 66. ‘ 
\| ‘ Uebersicht der urweltlichen Pflanzen des Kreidegebirges tiberhaupt 
und der Aachener Kreideschichten insbesondere,’ von Dr. M. Debey, in 
‘Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereines der preussischen Rhein- 
lande,’ 5. Jahrgang, 1848, p. 113. 
4 ‘Zur Flora des Quadersandsteins,’ in Nova Acta Acad. Nat. Cur. 
xxii. 1, p. 365, 
** ‘Sitzungsberichte der mathem.-naturw. Classe der kaiserlichen 
Academie der Wissenschaften, Wien,’ Bd. vii. Heft iv. 1851, p. 711. 
t+ ‘Additamente zur Flora des Quadergebirges in Sachsen,’ von Ernst 
yon Otto, Heft ii. Leipzig, 1854, p. 44. 
tt ‘De fossile planten van het Krijt in het hertogdom Limburg,, 
Srlem, 1863; Verhandl. Geol. Kaart Nederl. i, pp. 83-56, 
