THE LIST OP SHESHONQ AT KAKNAK. 115 



el-Daouaimeh. In this case the localities intermediate be- 

 tween Shoubbaloiit ni-Gabri and Ganat should be soiiglit, 

 partly in the valley of Oued en-Nas, partly in that of Oiied 

 el-Djezair, from south to north. 



^ k ^ J J^_. i ^ ^ t:^ (N««- «4-85)pa naciahon 

 nzaliout furnishes us a new exaiiiple of a name which the 

 scribe has disfigured by giving it an orthography that 

 resembles an Egyptian word : he has decomposed Azahont 

 into two terms, of which the former became for him the verb 



fl d "^ -^fc^ to spoil, to vol. As there is no such root as 



nti^ or TOV? I ^^^'^ tempted to see here one more compound 

 Avhose firstn umber will be "Jij^, t^ sty^ength, fortitude. 



The names which follow it no more lend themselves to a 

 reasonable identification than this, and it will sufiice for me 

 to enumerate them. 



(Nos. 86-88) ^^^ ^ i. ^^"Wa^^ ^^^ 



f^^^^ 1/ Tvk a >¥^ r\ \> 



(I [I (I *^\ r^-^vi , ta shodinaou 'pa hagali Shana'ia, which 



ought to be translated, the canals and the enclosure of Shana'ia : 

 Shana'ia is probably a derivative of the root pUJ, "i^tt? quievit. 



(No. 89) rn'^^'^r-^^ Ilaqa belongs to n^H miirmur- 

 avit, susiirravit. 



(No«. 90-91) ^-^ C J \^ fl ^ra f] ^ 



Pa nagahou oiiaha-ouaroul, the laud of Ouahaouarouk. -^ ^^ 

 Ouaronk is here a dialectic form of Barouk, as we have seen 

 above : the m preceding may be the article 11, but I do not 



see to what -^ _^ oua can answer. 



(No. 92-93) ^ \SJ ^^ ^ q I) Mf ] q S." 



the land of Ashakati. Ashakati, with the determinatives c^ ^, 

 is a derivative of nniU?) n^n0» tlfl'^iy . a qnt. 



(No. 94-95) ^f .^(jtl-f ^Ti:(l^-, 

 The enclosure of Haninia, is certainly not the Beit-Hanma of 

 the neighbourhood of Jerusalem ;* it is a locality of Simeon 

 or of the southern districts of Judah. Haninia is derived from 

 a form of ]^n and appears to answer to H^^in. The name 



* Brugsch, Geogr. Ins.. T. II, p. G9. 



