THE LIST OF SHESHONQ AT KARNAK. VZl 



j,,c djjs^ Kbaibet Mird of the English map, ]\Iird ^^~c of 

 Robinson,* which Avill sufficiently agree with the phice which 



S^ 



f\-^"^ 



Ahimaten occupies in our hst. (No. 127) Z5 



Galouna, Garouna, is certainly not, as Brngsch tliinks,t the 



'jT'iil Golan of JManasseh, which is too remote from the country 

 to which the list obliges ns to keep. It seems to me that we 

 have here an exact transcription of the word ]^il, ilj"1i!, 

 tJtreshing-floor : I do not find on the map any place named 



i^)^ Djarii or ^^ .:>- Djar'oi, wiiich would be the Arabic form 

 of the ancient name. '^^ y'''%j!§ (-^o- 'i-'^'^) ^lama . . . , 

 Ai'cima . . . , including the three letters of a root D7^^, 

 cannot be completed except by a snffix, probably that of the 

 pUiral, either the masculine plural ^^ y^'^ " k^^ Alaimmi, 

 or the feminine plural ^^ ^''m^^ Alamat. It is im- 

 possible for me to say Avhich we should prefer here, for 



•^^/^ a slteaf, a bundle of corn, which is the prototype of 

 ^ ^\li ^/«"'^^ lias both plurals Q^P^^ and ni^^«. 

 The following name, which Brugsch gives thus |g||'=' \j/ ^^i^f 

 . . . laliat or . . . rahat (No. 129), appears to have been 

 \\ ^ <:=>'#^^^, either nim«, plm-al of ^^^>^, «y^v, 2xdh : 

 I do not knoAv where this locality was situated. Kos. 



^&^\^^' • • . ^' (^•-•- 13^) k^^f^S^'- • • • 



(Norftl), [)^.2a^^m ]'^l (^o. 132)^2re not susceptible 



of any interpretatiom ^' The last \\ ^ _^^ tll||^? (No. 133) 

 laonra .... affords an hypothesis which I will content my- 

 self with indicating summarily, after Blau. If Ave complete it 



(][] "v^ _S2i(]q Mil ^ W\^^^^ laowisJialama, we should 



have here Q7lL^^")"^ Jerusalem, which Avith good right we 



should be astonished to miss among the towns taken by 

 Sheshonq. 



Such is the result of this study. The gaps with which 

 the list is riddled do not permit me to affirm with certainty 



* llobiiison, Biblical Researches, Vo). II, j). 270. 

 t Brugsch, Geogr. Inschriften, T. II, p. 70. 



