384 Mr. K. Andersen on 



Colour (1 skin). — In the two forms just described the more 

 or less distinct dark zone on the back takes the form of a 

 horseshoe-patch. In the present race this patch extends over 

 the whole of the back, giving the upperside of the animal an 

 almost uniform brown colour, approaching " mummy-brown.^' 

 Underside light " drab/' somewhat darker in shade than in 

 Rh. a. zuluensis. Ears and membranes (dried) black ; in 

 spirit-specimens the ears are " raw umber/' the wings 

 blackish brown. 



Dentition. — The only skull examined is of a very old 

 individual with much-worn teeth ; both upper p^ and lower 

 Pi are wanting, and no trace of tlieir alveoli is to be seen. la 

 younger individuals the dentition will no doubt be found to 

 agree with that of the other races. 



Type.— S ad. (skin). Fort Hill, N. Nyasa, about 9° 40' S., 

 83° 20' E., collected by Mr. A. Whyte, July 1896, presented 

 by 8ir Harry Johnston. B.M. no. 97. 10. 1.. 18. Original 

 no. 136. 



Distribution. — Specimens examined : — Mazoe, Mashona- 

 land, 17° 30' S., 23° 30' E. (3, in alcohol) ; Zomba, Nyasa, 

 15° 30' S., 35° 30' E. (1, alcohol); and the type.— From 

 these localities it may be supposed that the present form is 

 generally distributed over the whole of the area which is 

 irrigated by the Zambesi and its confluents. 



Remarks. — As will be seen from the above, the three 

 forms of Rh. augur just described are characteristic of tliree 

 distinct zoogeographical districts of S. Africa : — Rh. aucjur 

 of the Orange E,iver District (in wider sense) ; Rh. a. zulu- 

 ensis and zamhesiensis of the areas from which I have d'^vived 

 their names *. 



Rhinolophus sitnulator, sp. n. 



Short diagnosis.— \^mi\\\ upper premolar separating the 

 canine and posterior premolar. In outer aspect somewhat 

 like a peculiarly small and long- tailed Rh. capensis. Forearm 

 43-5-45 mm. J 



Nose-leaves. — Horseshoe as in Rh. capensis ; underlying 

 leaf distinct, under the margin of the horseshoe. Sella 

 longer (higher) and slightly broader than in Rh. capensis ', 

 constriction below the middle very shallow ; lateral margins 

 subparallel in their upper half ; summit broadly rounded off; 

 width at summit equal 1o half the vertical height of sella. 



* I am very glad to see these facts in perfect accordance witli the 

 zoogeographical subdivision of this part of S. Africa as proposed, five 

 years ago, by Professor Matschie in his admirable book ' Die Megachir- 

 opterea des Berliner Museums fUr Naturkundo ' (Berlin, 1899, p. 40). 



