304 Rey. T. Hincks on the Genus Retepora. 
From the South Seas : 
R. versipalma, De Blainville (Man. d’Act. p. 419). 
Of this species the diagnosis is hopelessly defective. 
From India: 
R. indica, D’ Orbigny. 
Nothing is to be learnt of this species from the brief 
notice of it in the ‘ Paléontologie Francaise’ (vol. v. p. 364); 
but it is identified by D’Orbigny with a form figured by 
Rumphius (Amboin. pl. 87. fig. 5); and as Busk quotes the 
latter as a synonym of his 2. phenicea, it is possible that 
this species and &. indica may be identical. 
From Florida : 
R. marsupiata, Smitt* (also from Teneriffe). 
R. reticulata, Pourtales +. Ranked by Smittas a variety of R. Beanwna, 
but probably a distinct species. Dredged from a depth of 270 
fathoms. 
R. reticulata of Johnston § Couch cannot be identified from their 
descriptions. 
From the Arctic seas: 
R. Wallichiana, Busk § Hincks { (associated with R. Beaniana, 
King, and R. cellulosa, Smitt). 
From the North Sea: 
R. Edwardsii, Van Beneden § (probably identical with R. cellulosa, 
Smitt). ; 
From the British seas: 
R. Beaniana, Avng ||. 
From the Mediterranean : 
R. cellulosa, auctt. 
There has been much confusion amongst authors as to the 
application of this name. The northern form, with which 
Smitt has connected it, ranges to the Mediterranean ; but it 
has probably been applhed to other Mediterranean forms by 
the earlier writers. 
I do not give this as an exhaustive list, though I believe 
that it will be found to include most of the described species 
* Floridan Bryozoa, pt. ii. p. 67, pl. xiii. figs. 245-254. 
+ Ibid. p. 69, pl. xiil. figs. 242-244, 
¢ Hincks on Polyzoa from Greenland (wrongly “Iceland” in the 
text) and Labrador, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. for January 1877, p. 107, 
pl. xi. figs. 9-15. 
§ “Sur les Polypes Bryozoaires de la Mer du Nord,” Bull, Acad. 
Roy. d. Belg. vol. xv. no. 2 (1849), pl. x. figs. 9-13, 
|| Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1846, xviii. p. 257. 
