BULL. 30] 



SAN ILDEFONSO— SAN JOSE 



441 



Bove.— Ofiate (1598) in Doc. In^d., xvi, 2.56, 1871. 

 Ildefonso. — Calhoun in Cal. Mess, and Corresp., 

 213, ia50. O-po-que— Bandelier in Ritch, New 

 Max., 201, 1885 (native name). O-po-que,— Ban- 

 delier in Ausland, 925, 1882 (native name). 

 P'ahwia'hliap.— Hodge, field notes, B. A. E., 1895 

 (Isleta name).^ Pakwiti. — Ibid. (Santa Ana 

 name). Pawha'hlita. — Ibid, ('where the river 

 enters a canyon': Taos name). P'Ho-juo-ge. — 

 Bandelier in Arch. Inst. Papers, iii, 260, 1890 (na- 

 tive name). Po-hua-gai. — Jouvenceau in Cath. 

 Pion., I, no. 9, 12, 1906. Po-juo-ge.— Bandelier in 

 Arch. Inst. Papers, iv, 82, 1892. Po-iuo-que, — Ibid., 

 Ill, 124, 1890 (aboriginal name). Poo-joge. — Ban- 

 delier, Gilded Man, 232, 1893. Posonwu.— Fewkes 

 in 19th Rep. B. A. E.. 614, 19U0 (Hano Tewa name; 

 probably identical). Posowe. — Stephen in 5th 

 Rep. B. A. E., 37, 1891 ( Hano name; probably iden- 

 tical). Powhoge. — Hewett in Am. Anthr., vi, 

 630, 1904. San Aldefonso.— Simpson, Rep. to Sec. 

 War, 140, 1850. San II de Conso.— Lane (1854) in 

 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, 689, 1855 (misprint). 

 San Ildefonso. — MS. of 1719 quoted by Bandelier 

 in Arch. Inst. Papers, v, 190, 1890; Villa-Sefior, 

 Theatro Am., ii, 418, 1748. San Ildefonzo.— Bre- 

 voort, New Mexico, 20, 1874. San Ildephonso. — 

 Villa-Senor, Theatro Am., ii, 413, 1748. San Ile- 

 fonso. — Beftavides, Memorial, 26, 1630. San Jlde- 

 fonso. — Wislizenus, Memoir, map, 1848. Sant 

 Yldefonso, — Bandelier in Arch. Inst. Papers, i, 19, 

 1881 (correcting Uiiate). Sant Ylefonso.— Onate 

 (159S)mDoc.InM., XVI, 116,1871. San Yldefonso.— 

 Davis, El Gringo, 88, 1857. San Yldefonzo.— Cur- 

 tis, Children of the Sun, 121, 1883. S. Ildefonse.— 

 Vaugondy, ]Map Am^rique, 1778. S. Udefonsia. — 

 Simpson in Rep. See. War, 2d map, 1850. S. Ilde- 

 fonso. — D'Anville, Map N. A., Bolton's ed., 1752. 

 Tse Tu Kinne.— Curtis, Am. Ind., 1, 138, 1907 ( 'houses 

 between rocks': Navaho name). 



San Ildefonso. A former rancheria, ap- 

 parently of the Soba, visited by Anza in 

 1774, and by Anza and Font in 1776; sit- 

 uated 4 leagues n. w. of Caborca, Sonora, 

 Mexico. See Anza, cited by Bancroft, 

 Ariz, and N. Mex., 389, 1889. 



San Ildefonso de Cieneguita. Mentioned 

 by Bancroft ( No. Mex. States, i, 524, 1884), 

 together with Tubac, Pitiqui, Caborca, 

 Cocospera, etc., as a mission of Sonora, 

 Mexico. Whether it was inhabited by 

 Pima, Papago, or Opata has not been 

 determined. 



Sanipao {Sa-ni-pa^-o). A former Coa- 

 huiltecan tribe, part of whom were 

 Christianized at Nuestra Senora de la 

 Purisima Concepcion mission (q. v.), 

 Texas. In Mar. 1755 a band of them, 

 the first of the tribe recorded in the mar- 

 riage book, appeared at Concepcion, and 

 in one day were instructed, baptized, and 

 remarried to the wives " whom they had 

 taken in the forests" (Concepcion Casa- 

 mientos, partidas 111-17). During the 

 next two or three years there were nu- 

 merous baptisms and marriages of per- 

 sons of this tribe, some evidently new- 

 comers, and thereafter an occasional one 

 is recorded down to 1790, when the ex- 

 tant record ceases (ibid., passim). The 

 language of the tribe is preserved in the 

 Manual (1760) of Bartholome Garcia, 

 who was stationed at the neighbor mis- 

 sion of San Francisco de la Espada. The 

 Sanipao are mentioned in the Informe 

 de Misiones of Mar. 6, 1762 (Mem. de 

 Nueva Espaila, xxviii, 167, MS.). Por- 

 tillo's statement that this tribe was at 



Concepcion at its foundation is probably 

 incorrect, and is apparently based on the 

 misleading statement in Kevilla-Gigedo's 

 Carta of 1793 (Portillo, Apuntes, 304, 

 1888). (h. E. B.) 



Samipoas.— Taylor in Cal. Farmer, Apr. 17, 1863. 

 Sanipao.— Concepci6n Casamientos, partida '248, 

 1790, MS. 



San Jacome. A rancheria, apparently of 

 the Cajuenche, in the 18th centurj', situ- 

 ated near the mountains, about lat. 

 33° 08', central s. California. — Garces 

 (1775), Diary, 167, 1900. 



San Javier. See San Francisco Xavier 

 de Horcasitas; San Xavier. 



San Joaquin (Saint Joachim). An In- 

 dian settlement and mission visita in 1745, 

 situated 3 leagues from the parent mission 

 of San Ignacio de Kadakaman, Lower 

 California. 



S. Gioachino. — Clavigero, Storia della Cal., 1, 107, 

 1789 (Italian form). S. Joachin. — Venegas, Hist. 

 Cal., II, 19S, 17.59. 



San Joaquin. A collective name for the 

 Costanoan, Moquelumnan, and Yokuts 

 tribes on San Joaquin r., Cal., estimated 

 to number a1>out 400. 



San Joaquin's Band. A Paviotso band, 

 named from its chief, formerly in Carson 

 valley, at the forks, in w. Nevada. They 

 were said to have numbered 170 in 1859. — 

 Dodge in Ind. Aff. Rep. 1859, 373, 1860. 



San Jose (Saint Joseph), The fourteenth 

 Franciscan mission founded in California, 

 and the first one of the five new missions 

 established by Fr. Lasuen in 1797-98 to 

 fill the gaps between the older ones. The 

 site chosen was about 15 m. n. of Santa 

 Clara, and about 3 m. from the present 

 town of Irvington, Alameda co. The 

 native name of the site was Oroysom. 

 The formal ceremonies of foundation were 

 performed by Fr. Lasuen on June 11, 1797, 

 and by the end of that year there were 

 33 baptisms, and 286 by 1800. In 1810 

 there were 545, but 1,104 deaths were re- 

 ported during the decade. In 1820 there 

 were 1,754 neophytes. The highest num- 

 ber, 1,886, was reached in 1831. The 

 mission was prosperous from the begin- 

 ning and continued so long after many of 

 the others declined. In 1(820. there were 

 6,859 large stock and 1,200 small stock; 

 in 1830, 13,300 and 13,030, respectively. 

 The average crop for the decade ending 

 1820 was 6,020 bushels, and for that end- 

 ing 1830, 5,409 bushels. The first church 

 was a wooden structure with a grass roof, 

 but in 1809 a new church was dedicated. 

 Even before the founding of the mission 

 the Indians of its neighborhood, espe- 

 cially to the eastward, were somewhat 

 feared, and San Jose seems to have had 

 more trouble witli the Indians than any 

 other in California. The rather forceful 

 methods used by the padres in obtaining 

 neophj'tes, together with the ease with 

 which they could escape to gentile or 



