f 
X 600. 
THAXTER. — MONOGRAPH OF THE LABOULBKMACI -:.E. .\.'u 
Dichomyces infectus Thaxter. Figs. 3-4. Two variations showing anterior and po rior views »s, ratv 
Dichomyces vulgatm Thaxter. Figs. 5-6. Anterior views illustrating two types of form, X 600. 
append 
Figs. 7 8 
.._„ „. . . , culate tips of perithecia, X 1800. Fig. 9. Author view of individual fa 
which the penthecial appendages are absent. An adventitious peril bedum developing from f he s (M | | „ ;i , , !l( . 
left, X 600. 
Dichomyces furciferus Thaxter, variety. Figs. 10-11. Anterior views of two Individuals lowing variation 
Matenal from Cambridge, X 600. Fig. 12. Posterior view of individual from Abyswnia, x 800 
Dichomyces Homalotv Thaxter. Fig. 13. Anterior view of pale individual, X <ii>0.' Fig 14 Post, for view 
of type form, X 600. 
Dwhomyces hybridus Thaxter . Fig. 15. Anterior view of individual in which the peril 1„ bl appends are 
absent, X 600. Fig. 16. Individual having both types of perithecia, X 600. Fig 17. Posterior view of fadi 
he appendiculate type, X 600. Figs. 18-19. Posterior and anterior view* 
of tips of perithecia of the appendiculate type, X 1800. 
pen 
PLATE XXXII 
Dichomyces Javanus Thaxter. Figs. 1-2. 
forms, X 600 
Dichomyces insignis Thaxter . Fig. 3. Posterior view of well developed individual, X 000. Fig. 4. Ant!), d- 
dium much enlarged, x 1800. Figs. 5 6. Anterior and posterior views of the appendieulate tips of two peril] ia, 
X 1800. 
Dichomyces dubius Thaxter. Figs. 7-8. Two individuals with two (posterior view) and four (anterior view 
perithecia respectively, X 600. Figs. 9-10. Anterior and posterior views of the appendicular e t ipe of t wo | •< rit he- 
cia, X 1800. 
Dichomyces Madagascarensis Thaxter. Figs. 11-12. Anterior and posterior views of well dcvelojwd individ- 
uals, X 600. Fig. 13. Anterior view of tip of perithecium, X 1800. 
Dichomyces bifida* Thaxter. Fig. 14. Anterior view of well developed individual, X 600. Figs. 15 16. In- 
terior and anterior views of tips of perithecia, X 1800. 
PLATE XXXIII. 
Dichomyces biformis Thaxter. Fig. 1. Posterior view of well developed individual with seven mature and 
one immature appendiculate perithecium, X 600. Fig. 2. Anterior view of a typical individual wit h six appendiceal e 
]>erithecia (England), X 600. Fig. 3. Anterior view of individual with perithecia of the second type I arinf no 
appendages, X 600. Figs. 4-5. Posterior and anterior views of tips of appendiculate perithecia, X 1800. 
Dichomyces Belonychi Thaxter. Figs. 6-7. Two individuals, posterior and anterior views respectively, X 800. 
Figs. 8-9. Posterior and anterior views of the tips of appendiculate perithecia X 1800. 
Dichomyces Australiensis Thaxter. Figs. 10-11. Two individuals, posterior and anterior views reap lively, 
X 600. Figs. 12-13. Anterior and posterior views of appendiculate tips of perit hecia. X 1800. 
Dichomyces Mexicanus Thaxter. Figs. 14-15. Two individual- anterior and posterior views respectively, X 
600. Figs. 16-17. Posterior and anterior views of appendiculate tips of perit hem, X 1800. 
PLATE XXXIV. 
Rickia Wasmanni Berlese. Figs. 1-9. 
Fig. 10. Mature individual, X 290. Fig. 11. 
ulividuals, X 1100. 
i;00. Figs. 12 13. 
Antheridia illustrating compound character, X 1400. 
Limnaiomyces Tropisterni Thaxter. Figs. 14-15. Mature individuals. The pointed anlhcndium is shown 
t he left in fig. 5 just below the base of the perithecium, X 290. . 
Limnaiomyces Hydrocharis Thaxter. Figs. 16-17. Two mature individuals, X 290. Figs. 18. 1 oung indi- 
vidual; the young antheridium at x, X 600. 
Chitonomyces Orectogyri Thaxter. Figs. 19-20. Two mature individuals, X 290. 
Chitonomyces Aethiomcus Thaxter. Figs. 21-22. Two mature individuals, X 290. 
600 
Chitonomyces psittacopsis Thaxter. Figs. 23-24. Two mature individuals, X 2W, Fig. to. up 01 pen- 
ium more highly magnified, X 600. . . , . , ^^ j 
Chitonomyces dentiferus Thaxter. Figs. 26-27. Two mature individuals 
seen from oppo. 
