310 ALLAN HANCOCK PACIFIC EXPEDITIONS VOL. 6 



The records for this species are all from the western Atlantic but the 

 Pacific specimens are very similar and seem to be included in this species. 



Stations: 1157, 1240, 223, 2024, 2065, 2067, 307, 411, 412, 459, 461, 

 468, 540, 611, and 615. 



Distribution. — Two stations, off Santa Cruz and San Miguel Islands, 

 have records of 74 and 35 fms. respectively. In the Gulf of California, 

 Station 2024 shows a depth of 55 fms. At Secas Islands, Panama, the 

 record is 40-80 fms. Off Galapagos Islands the depth range is 15 to 111 

 fms., the average being 54 fms. At Southampton, England, it was found 

 in 8 fms. Specimens of this species were most numerous off Clarion 

 Island in 53 fms. 



Genus DENTALINA d'Orbigny, 1826 

 Dentalina consobrina d'Orbigny, var. emaciata Reuss 



Plate 40, Fig. 16 



Dentalina emaciata Reuss, Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., vol. 3, 1851, 

 p. 63, pi. 3, fig. 9. 



Nodosaria (Dentalina) consobrina d'Orbigny, var. emaciata Reuss, 

 Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. 25, 1865, p. 132, pi. 2, figs. 12, 13. 

 — H. B. Brady, Rep. Voy. Challenger, Zoology, vol. 9, 1884, p. 502, 

 pi. 62, figs. 25, 26.— Flint, Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Mus. 1897 (1899), 

 p. 310, pi. 56, fig. 1.— Cushman, Bull. 71, U. S. Nat. Mus., pt. 3, 1913, 

 p. 56, pi. 27, fig. 9; Bull. 104, pt. 4, 1923, p. 78, pi. 13, figs. 3-5. 



Dentalina consobrina d'Orbigny, var. emaciata Rzehak, Verb. Nat. 

 Ver. Briinn, vol. 14, pt. 1, 1885, pp. 96, 105.— Liebus, Jahrb. Geol. 

 Reichsanst.,vol. 56, 1906, p. 353. — Cushman, Bull. 4, Florida State Geol. 

 Survey, 1930, p. 28, pi. 5, fig. 2. — Cushman and Ponton, idem, Bull. 9, 

 1932, p. 61.— Howe and Wallace, Louisiana Geol. Bull. No. 2, 1932, 

 p. 25, pi. 7, fig. 7. — Wiesner, Deutsche Sud-Polar-Exped., vol. 20, Zool., 

 1931, p. 114. — Hada, Sci. Rep't Tohoku Imp. Univ., ser. 4, Biol., vol. 6, 

 1931, p. 96, text fig. 49.— Cushman and Cahill, U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. 

 Paper 175-A, 1933, p. 14, pi. 5, fig. 3. — Coryell and Embich, Journ. 

 Pal., vol. 11, 1937, p. 298, pi. 42, fig. 9.— di Napoli Alliata, Boll. Soc. 

 Sci. Nat. Econ. Palermo, vol. 19, Anno 1936-7 (1937), p. 10; Boll. Soc. 

 Geol. Ital., vol. 56, 1937, p. 412 (list).— LeRoy, Colorado School Mines 

 Quart., vol. 36, No. 1, pt. 2, 1941, p. 74, pi. 1, fig. 18.— Bergquist, Bull. 

 49, Mississippi State Geol. Survey, 1942, p. 41. — Colom, Num. 3, Estudi- 

 os Geologicos, Instit. Invest. Geol., 1946, p. 143, pi. 9, figs. 131, 132. 

 —Cushman, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 210-A, 1946, p. 4.— Cush- 

 man and Gray, Special Publ. No. 19, Cushman Lab. Foram. Res., 1946, 

 p. 13, pi. 2, figs. 23, 24. 



