im 
) 
50) ae cibo is in My BE of Amer. 
imperfect. 
) Expl. Exped: too 
E 
"53) „Pitcihpereim Pickeringii, A. (diy.e 
Kijdahentty bat peduncles much shorter. 
54) ,P. Ritchei, A. Gray.* Apparent 
Not 
so; but is the flowering P. Ritchei, A. Gray. 
56) ,P. tobiroides, A. Gray*; not so; 
but is my P. Brackenridgei, 
Meliaceae. 
59) »Aglaia? basiphylla, A. Gray“, Not 
so; but is the plant too imperfect for determina- 
tion mentioned p. 238 of Bot. Amer. Expl. Exped. 
Perhaps a var. of your n. 60, A. edulis. 
indaceae. 
67) A lias apot: La Bill.“ oe 
so; but the flowers are a desideratum,| The fo- 
liage resembles C. Pd but inflorescence is 
very different. 
68) „C. Vitiensis, Seem.*; appears to. be 
a broader fotm of C. faleata, A. nrbi 10, with 
fully ripe fruit. 
173) Was not sent. 
74) = Cupania rhoifolia, A. Gray = 69. 
Ampelideae. 
Saponaria, Seem.“ th 
belongs Cissus gehiculata, Bl.? from the Fijis. 
Rhamneae. — 
19) ,Smythea pacifica, Seem.“ Is diffe- 
rent from my Ventilago ? Vitiensis (and resem- 
bling V. Bombaiensis) in its axillary tii 
flowers; in the fruit apparently like V. lance 
'Tul, with which it ought to be compared. To 
my jf Mi Vitiensis apparently belongs V. cer- 
bic 
ENG 
Pte eit Ritchei, A Ng er Pro- 
m the fruit less winged, e 
3) No flowers nor fruit sent; 
of > being Rhamnaceous. 
84) Same remark. 
85) Not in Coll. Am. Expl. Exped. Colubrina? 
no evidence 
Rutaceae. 
j 90) sii elieo pet == Evodia dru La 
Bill, ? in Bot. Amer. Expl. Exped., but narrower 
leaflets. — 103?? (Nr. 103 is a large forest 
tree, n. 90 a shrub 3—4 feet high. B. 5.) 
102) May be i, eng heterophylla, 
y: Apesimem, in 
Simarubaceae. . 
05) „Brucen??« — me only; not in 
Exped. : | 
> Coll. Amer, Expl. 
f 
Leguminosae. 
107) „Tephrosia purpurea, Persa also 
= T. piscatoria, 
123) „Rhynchosia minima, DeCand.* Is 
no Rhynchosia (but Glyeine Tabacina, Bth, 
var. B. Seem.). 
127) idi piscatoria® = Derris 
uliginosa, Bt 
131) Not in Amer. Expl. Exp. Coll. 
133) ,Storekiella  Vitiensis, Seem.“ 
(Bonpl. tab, 6.) Not in Amer. Ex apt Exp. Coll. 
yrtaceae. 
156) „Eugenia confertiflora, A. Gray.“ 
longer and striate-angled, at it is not in our young 
buds. The means of comparison are not complete. 
162) : Hoy vite rivularis Seem.* Both dif- 
163) E. (Grayi Seem. msc.) Her more 
or d from any we have. à; 
„Nelitris fruticosa, A, Gray“ =N, 
Viti A. Gray. 
cal The plant is very commo d varies ur 
tremely according to the Hrantion in which i 
grows. DB. Seem 
168) „Acicalyptus myrtoides, A. Gray.* 
In foliage extremely similar, but flower buds quite 
different. us! 
A..myrtoides, A. Gra . Bot. Amer. Expl, Exped ; 
alabastris elongato-oblongis M. 4 angulatis, operculo 
subulato, floribus corymboso-cy mosis | plerumque pedi- 
cellatis. 
A. Seemanni, A, Gray. (= A. myrtoides, Seem. 
in Bonpl. IX, p. 256, Siue Coll. n. 168); alabastris 
clavatis inferne tantum tetragonis, operculo conico bre- 
viter apiculato, floribus in cyma subthyrsoidea plerum- 
que sessilibus. 
169) „Metrosider ros collina“ 
glaberrima. 
170, 171) Slender forme at 169. ata. "A 
has yellow flowers and,a habit very: 
that of n. 169. B. Seem.) 
a 
I 
Var. 
Méesotbasedis | 
vidi Lamia add darem Vitiense; | ià. Gray.« 
= 
thotigh € insufficient. 
175) Not sent, but 
ITT) -p Medinilla“: is clearly M. rhodo- 
chlaena, A. Gray. 
478) Not ‘communicated, — 
181) We. had only foliage PT it 
. 182) Not in Amer. Expl. m Me- 
dinilla? 
75) (Is also .a- pe near :Me- 
dinilla; what appeared to yx is an in- 
voluere, and. what appeared to a winged fruits 
are tracts, two of which enclose each bud. 
) 
=) 
(I regarded both as identi-. 
173) jAlstonáa Piékeringii* No, but | 
= Astronidium parviflorum, A. Griy,- "e 
AR cime ne 
The N 
i 
