ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA, 323 
Bolus remarks that the species is allied to M. pusillum, Harv., but the flowers 
are larger, the perianth-segments differently shaped and equal in ee the spur 
of the lip much shorter, and the column and rostellum also differe 
10. Holothrix parvifolia (Lindl.). Page 103, line 8 from the 
bottom, for O. hispida, read Orchis hispida. 
25. Satyrium eo (Sw.). The synonym Orchis bicornis, 
Linn. Sp. Pl. ed. ii. 1330, should be excluded. It was based on 
Linn. Gok. oat: Vi. 109, and Orchis lutea, caule “re reps Buaxb. 
Pl. Min. Cogn. Cent. iii 6, t. 8 (misquoted by Linneus as ¢. 6), 
which is Satyrium bicorne, Thunb., as correctly cited a 170 of 
this volume. The mistake apparently na with Loddiges, who in 
‘ ifoli der the 
1818 (Bot. Cab 104) ngly fi cortifolium under 
name of S. cucullatum, remarking that it was ‘ Orchis bicornis of the 
older authors.’ . cucullatum, Thunb., , is a synony f 
S. bicorne, Thunb. \ Bolus (Orch. Cap. Penins. 124) cited O. bicorne, 
inn., aS a synonym of S. coriifolium, and the error seems to have 
been copied into all subsequent works us also cites as S. erectum, 
ndl., the figures Lodd. Bot. Cab. t. 104; Bot. Ma 2172; an 
two others S. coriifolium. There is the further complication that 
S. erectum, Lindl., is not the See S. erectum, Sw. Bolus cited 
Orchis bicornis, Linn. Sp, +. ed. 1330, u = S. coritfolium, oe 
. bicorni. J bicorn 
caule geniculato, Buab. Pl. Min. Cogn. Cent. iii. t. 8, which is a quite 
characteristic figure of S. bicorne. 
Page 161, line 27, for O. luteo, read O. lutea. 
1, Penthea Lamege agar Page 208, line 33, for Disa patens, 
Thunb., read Disa patens, Sw. Lindley cites it as Disa patens, 
Willd. [Sp. Pl. iv. 53], which is antedated five years by D. 
patens, Sw. 
Page 209, line 14, after Disa patens, Sw. in Vet. Acad. Handl. 
Stockh. 1800, 214, add “ partly.” 
2. Penthea oe, ferns a 210, line 4, after Disa 
filicornis, Thunb, Ca , and > ; line 8, after Disa 
patens, Sw. in Vet. pa andl, Stockh. 1800, 214, add “ partly.” 
Swartz included two plants under his Disa patens, viz. Serapias 
patens, Thunb., and Orchis filicornis, Linn., but the former is 
Ssh with Ophrys patens, ee on which Disa tenuifolia, Sw., 
was | mis to others, which were 
peotifind 3 in ate eae of cin patens and P. filicornis 
