.COOKE : ON JEFFREYS BRITISH CONCHOLOGY. 7 



P. 45. PoROMYA GRANULATA. — For Corhulci graiiulaia .... 

 d'Anvers read Corhula ? gramdata, Nyst and West., Nouv. Recherch. 

 Coq. Foss. d'Anvers (1839). 



P. 49. Neaera costellata. — For Exp. Scient. Mor. (Geologie), 

 p. 86, t. vii read Exp. Scient. Mor. (Zoologie), 1833, Tome iii, pt. i, 

 sect. I, t. xxiv. 



P. 51. Neaera rostrata. — For iii read 1793, iii, pt. i. 



P. 64. Mya arenaria. — For p. 11 12 read ed. 10, p. 670, no. 17. 



P. 66. Mya truncata. — For p. 11 12 read ed. 10, p. 670, no. 16. 



P. 70. Mya Binghami. — For Turt. Dith. read Turt. Conch. Ins. 

 Brit. (1822). 



P. 86. Venerupis Irus.— For p. 1128 read ed. 10, p. 683, no. 90. 



P. 104. Pholas dactylus. — For dad ylus .... p. iiioread Dac- 

 f I/las . . . . ed. 10, p. 669, no. 10. 



P. 107. Pholas Candida. — For p. iiii read ed. 10, p. 669, no. 



13- 



P. 112. Pholas crispata.— For P. crispata .... p. iiii read 

 Mya crispata .... ed. 10, p. 670, no. 15. 



P. 116. Pholadidea papyracea. — For Turt. Dith. read Turt. 

 Conch. Ins. Brit. (1822). 



P. 168. Teredo norvegica. — For f. 4— 6B, and 7 read f. 4 — 6 

 and B. There is no reason why Spengler's speUing norvagica should 

 be altered. 



P. 171. Teredo navalis. — For p. 1267 read ed. 10, p. 651, no. 2. 



P. 176. Teredo megotara. — For xvii read xviii. 



P. i8r. Teredo malleolus. — The reference, which is omitted, 

 is Turton, Conch. Ins. Brit. (1822), p. 255, pi. 2, f. 19. 



P. 182. — Teredo bipennata (the alteration to hipinnata is need- 

 less). The reference, which is omitted, is Turton, Conch. Diet. (1819), 

 p. 184, f. 38—40. 



P. 191. Dentalium entalis. — ForZ). entalis .... p. 1263 read 

 D. Entalis .... ed. 10, p. 785, no. 688. 



P. 214. Chiton discrepans. — For 111. Conch., p. 65, pi. xxi, f. 20 

 read 111. Conch., ed. i (1827), pi. 35, f. 20; ed. 2 (1844), p. 65, pi. 21, 

 f. 20. There is no description in ed. i. 



P. 215. Chiton Hanleyi.— Remove the brackets from (Bean). 



P. 2 1 7. Chiton cancellatus. — The full reference is G. B. Sowerby, 

 Jun., Descriptive Catalogue of British Chitones, p. 4, in Conch. Illust., 

 Part 167, f. 104 (twice) 104a, 104&, 105. " Part " apparently = Plate. 

 It is quite time that Leach's name should cease to be attached to this 

 species. The following remark seems to have been lost sight of. 

 "The supposed Chiton cancellatus of Leach, — for the species was 



