Betany and Zoology. 131 
different from that of Boott, et is probably confined: to the N. W. 
toast, is, however, the C. Liddoni of Dewey, (Wood's: Holenys) and of 
see (Gray’s Manual of Seta ) 
ve No. 48, CG. straminea, Schk.,” scarcely differs from No. 77,C. alata, 
Torr. ma Gr., except in the rather inferior size of the spikes. - Three 
‘other varieties of fC. straminea are &: ginee in No, 76. 
“No. 49. C. straminea, , Tuck,” is C-adusta, 
ne species edema cane near to - ads which i is generally 
rstood, though without absolute certain wl ar eng: Schk. 
. No. 51, Sg correctly, mek doubtfully, re to C. torta, Boott. 
* “No. 58. C. acuta, L., v. erecta, Dews, C. aperta, Boott ” "This ap- 
‘pears to differ from Boot” s plant, principally in sor: ‘smaller size of the 
and it p would be difficult to distinguish them by eae — 
- acuia, L. has not been found on this contin 
‘tnists gene rally, has never. ete bintadn on din continent. ~ 
© No. 57, C. salina, Wahl.?2” is also a form of C. jerictey Lam., 
pand ninelta ened iperiggy iia. Iti is referred, by Gay, to C. ver- 
Freedl. 
‘Tucosa, F, 
goto ids Asnpipiney Dinan sehoeld. deveukier dsosibed:4o-Dt. 
=e ee aaa with the —— ones eit boy Pepfesear 
bs Nox 130. -6. of eaghtbetis Torr. >” iene st Torrey’ s. plant. ae. is, 
‘Pethaps, a stabs: form of No. 129, C: striata; 
© * No. 146... dupulina, Mul.» ° Phe name of 6. gigenen Rose, 
Several (: 
than C, 
a is Drbabie tnt botanists may differ from Dr. Sartwell a to some 
totent an and hone wh6 ateiad fortunate as to possess a set of his valu- 
lars, will have the an 
Son Te j is, indeed, to be regretted that these beautiful specimens can- 
‘Rot, inthe , ‘very nature of the case, be so widely diffused as might be 
‘desired, more meaty pr pe 3/since the ey 
28 ee) eltntty specific. characters 10. the ‘species of so — 
rT rot of. Dr: Sarweit _ better calculated to correct, 
FeO. 
ly aaatnn pre ae ‘arden Algarum. Lundy 8vo, 
1, 1848, tye ii, pars. 2, 1852.—The second part 
