408 SMITH: STUDIES IN THE GENUS LUPINUS 
P. A. Rydberg 599 (US). Harling County: Steppe, July, 1910, S. 
S. Visher 231 (RM). Meade County: Smithville, June, 1894, V. 
Bailey to (US). Perkins County: Bixby, July, 1912, S. S. Visher 
615 (RM). Washington County: Sheep Mountain and sand hills 
south, July, 1911, S. S. Visher 2406 (NY). County not given: 
near White Earth River, Missouri, J. N. Nicolet 161 (G); north 
edge of sand bluff, S. A. Skinner 177 (RM). 
NEBRASKA. Brown County: Longpine, June, 1897, J. M. 
Bates (RM). Cherry County: Valentine, June, 1891, J. ,M. 
Bates (G, T). Frontier County: near Curtis, June, 1891, P. A. 
Rydberg 46 (NY). Keith County: without definite locality, June, 
1890, G. D. Swezey (T). Dawes County: Crawford, June, 1891, 
J. M. Bates (B). 
Kansas. Finney County: Garden City, May, 1891, H. W. 
Menke (T). Graham County: without definite locality, June, 
1897, A. S. Hitchcock 81a (G, NY, RM, US). Logan County: - 
without definite locality, May, 1895, A. S. Hitchcock 81 (G, NY, 
RM, US). County not given: western Kansas, 1885, E. N. Plank 
45. te 
New Mexico. San Juan County: Aztec, May, 1899, C. 
F. Baker 435 (G, NY, RM,* US). Dona Ana County: near 
Organ Mountains, Apr., 1852, Mexican Boundary Survey 287 
(NY, two sheets); opposite Frontera, March, 1852, C. Wright 
1362 (US 20950-1). Without locality: Mex. Boundary Survey 
(US 20941, upper and left-hand specimens); 1851, C. Wright 
1302c (G); May, 1901, F. K. Vreeland 821 (NY). 
ARIZONA. Pimta County: Tucson, March, 1852, c C. Parry 
(T). Without locality: 1869, E. Palmer (US 20944, two upper 
specimens). 
12b. Lupinus pusillus intermontanus (Heller) comb. nov. 
[Fic. 52 
Lupinus intermontanus Heller, Muhlenbergia 8:87. 1912. 


* The ‘‘RM”’ sheet of this collection has Baker’s number given as ‘‘ 433,” 
is labelled L. aduncus Greene, whence Heller has annotated this sheet as follows: 
““Apparently immature L. rubens Rydb. Baker has mixed labels. L. aduncus is a 
perennial. I have the real thing here now, also under 433.’’ It is evidently a part 
of Baker’s collection 435, which seems to have been originally determined as L. 
arizonicus. I may be wrong in assigning it to L. pusillus a of to L. rubens. 
Matured plants with pods and seeds are needed for 

7 
