Same specimen as before. 
e) idem, Depok, Aug. 1917. 
Peduncle flattened, splits up into two stalks bearing each a 
normai spadix with normal spathe. (Fig. 22). ; 
J) idem, idem; April 1916. 
Peduncle slightly flattened, 1 spathe, spadix a little flattened 
at the base, splits up 2¢.M. above the base into two spadices 
of normal shape but of different length (4.3 and 2.2¢.M.). Whether 
_we have to do here with a dichotomy or a lateral branching 
is somewhat dubitable. 
g) idem. 
Legit Miss C. Toomann in suo horto Buitenzorg, March 1917. 
Peduncle flattened, divided by grooves into two unequal 
portions, upper portion twisted. Spathe almost normal, base 
decurrent at either side and sheathing. Spadix comb-shaped: 
7¢.M. long, 2.4 ¢.M. wide (in the middle). Some 3.5 m.M. under 
this spadix emerges a lateral spadix, 4¢.M. long (fig. 21). 
h) idem. 
Legit P. A. Ouwens, aie eas May 1918. 
1) Spadix flattened, splits up 2.5¢.M. above the base into 
two almost equal cylindric spadices, 1 spathe. 
2) Spadix flattened, splits up 2.7¢.M. above the base into 
two: «) flat, bifurcates, 6) comb-shaped, splits up into 4 blunt 
tops. One spathe. 
7) idem. 
Legit C. van Zisp, Malang, May 1918. 
Peduncle strongly fasciating. Splits up into a fasciating and 
a normal stem. The first bears one spathe and a strongly 
fasciated spadix showing 6 tops. The second one is normal and 
so is the spathe. 
We wish to point out again that these disturbances occurred 
not only cluring the same period (1916—1918) but also that 
they took place in places of Java far removed from each other. — 
Anthurium spec. 
Legit J. J. Swarm in horto bog., May 1916. 
Spadix dichotomizing, one spathe only. 
