4348 THE ZooLocist—FeEBrvary, 1875. 
apex of each elytron is less rounded and there is a small tooth at the sutural 
angle. Length 1 inch 10 lines; width 8 lines. Habitat, Sierra Leone. 
Acanthophorus capensis, White. This species. is correctly placed in 
that genus, and does not belong to Tithoés, as placed in Gemminger’s 
Catalogue. 
Mallodon gnatho, White. This insect must be placed in Lacordaire’s 
genus Nothopleurus (Gen. d. Col. viii. p. 125). As nothing is said by 
Lacordaire about the form of the mandibles in the description of N. ebeninus, 
it will probably prove to be a species distinct from M. gnatho, which has a 
remarkably large triangular tooth on the upper edge at the base of each 
mandible. The thorax of M. gnatho has parallel sides. 
Tragosoma subcoriaceum, Hope, female, 1831. The male of this insect 
was described in 1867 by Mr. Pascoe, under the name Sarmydus anten- 
natus. 
Fam. CERAMBYOIDE. 
Eburophora, White (Eburigera, Gemm. & Harold, Cat. p. 2899). This 
genus should be placed next to Sophron, Newm., and Sophron eburatus, 
Pascoe, should be transferred to it. 
Trichoxys flecus, Chevr., 1860 = Clytus melanotelus, White, 1855. 
(Types compared.) 
Anthoboscus figuratus, Pascoe, 1869 = Clytanthus marginalis, Chevr., 
1863. (Types compared.) 
Anthoboscus leucothyreus, Pascoe, 1869 = Clytanthus austerus, Chevr., 
1863. (Types compared.) 
Clytanthus oppositus, Chevr., 1863 = Clytus signaticollis, Lap. d Gory, 
but with the pubescence rubbed off the abdomen; it is not a synonym of 
C. japonicus, as suggested by Mr. Bates, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., 1878. 
Clytus Protogenes, Newman. This is not a synonym of Chlorophorus 
annularis, as placed in Gemminger’s Catalogue, but belongs to the genus 
Acrocyrta, with the third and fourth antennal joints (and fifth slightly) 
spined ; it is very closely allied to Acrocyrta strangaloides of Pascoe. 
Xylotrechus famelicus, Pascoe. This species, for which Mr. Pascoe had 
no locality, is from Borneo. 
Clytus dominula, White, is a Xylotrechus, closely allied to C. Grayi, White, 
and is not a Rhaphuma, as placed by Chevrolat. 
Clytus subcruciatus, White, is a Calanthemis. 
Clytus Phidias, Newman, is not Xylotrechus australis, Lap. ¢ Gory, as 
placed in Gemminger’s Catalogue, but it is closely allied. 
Clytus Mouhotii, Pascoe, 1869 = Clytus semiluctuosus, White, 1855. 
Eriphus leucogrammus, White = Peeciloderma lineolatum, White, and 
belongs rather to this latter genus.”"—I’. G. 
— a 
