LION. 369 
It must not, however, be supposed that lions by any means restrict themselves 
to the flesh of animals which have fallen to their own attacks. The writer last 
quoted mentions their partiality for the flesh of rhinoceroses, which they are unable 
to kill themselves, and states that as many as eight or ten have been seen tearing 
at once at the flesh of one of those animals that had been shot by a hunter of his 
own. This is confirmed by the statement of Gordon Cumming already mentioned. 
In addition to eating the flesh of animals recently killed, lions will also prey 
upon carcases in an advanced state of decomposition. This fact was stated long 
ago by Gordon Cumming, and is fully supported by the observations of Mr. Selous. 
The latter writer states that when elephants have been shot, “lions will prey upon 
the stinking carcases as they le festering in the rays of a tropical sun, and at last 
become a seething mass of maggots, returning night after night to the feast, until 
no more meat is left. This occurs in parts of the country abounding in game, 
where it would give a party of lions but little trouble or exertion to catch a zebra, 
buffalo, or antelope, and procure themselves a meal of fresh meat. In the same 
way, no matter how plentiful game may be, lions will almost invariably feast upon 
any dead animal left by the hunter, from a buffalo to a steimbuck, that they may 
happen to come across.” 
Near villages, when lions grow too old to be able to take game for themselves, 
Livingstone states that they will take to killing goats; while women or children 
who happen to come in their way at night also become victims. On the other hand, 
when far away from human _ habitations, such decrepit lions are stated by the 
same writer to catch mice and other small Rodents, and will even at times eat grass, 
although this may be taken medicinally. 
That such lions, which have become too feeble to prey upon game, would 
naturally develop into “ man-eaters,” if they were permitted to live, appears highly 
probable. Mr. Selous believes, however, that the absence of man-eating lons in 
those parts of Africa with which he is acquainted is due “to the superior boldness 
of the African natives over those of India, for even amongst the least martial 
tribes of South Africa, if two or three people are killed by a lion, the population of 
the surrounding country is roused, and, a party being formed, the lion is usually 
surrounded and stabbed to death with assegais; whilst, amongst such warlike 
tribes as the Matabele, if a lion only kills an ox, or even a goat, its fate is usually 
sealed, or, even if not killed, it gets such a scare that it is glad to quit the district. 
Such a thing as a man-eater, or even an habitual cattle-slayer, would never be 
tolerated for an instant.” 
According, however, to Mr. Drummond, whose shooting experiences were 
confined to Eastern South Africa, in the districts of Zululand, Tongaland, and 
Swaziland, man-eating lions are to be met with in some regions. And this writer 
relates how he became an accessory to the death of two such man-eaters, one of 
which had well-nigh depopulated a district, having killed between thirty and forty 
individuals; while the second, although dwelling in an uninhabited country full 
of game, had become notorious for its attacks upon the camps of the hunters. 
The former, indeed, appeared to be an animal in the full enjoyment of bodily 
strength, as it is said to have habitually leaped over the high fences which 
surround the Zulu villages. 
VOL. I.—24 
