1907] SCHNEIDER—CONSPECTUS GENERIS AMORPHAE 303 
Texas.—Very similar are some small specimens from Columbia, Bush, 
nos. 1308 and 158r. 
A. liniana, as I understand it, is a very glabrous species, with leaflets 
oer shorter and broader than those of A. fennessensis and A. angustifolia; 
ut without very ripe fruits it is yee difficult to say to what species such a form 
may belong. Only sp ollected in September have the fruits fully ripened. 
g. A. TENNESSENSIS Shuttlw. in Kunze Delect. Sem. Hort. 
Lips. p. 1. adn. 1848, et in Linnaea 24:191. 1851 (descript. non 
sufficiens); vide Boynton in Small Fl. S. E. United States 625. 1903. 
TENNESSEE.—Prope Dandridge, Rugel, vi et ix. 42 (oes orig., fructibus 
maturis dorso fere rectis!); Polk Co., Bilim. Herb., no. 1381a 
It is not without some reservation that the following specimens are placed 
with this species: 
Nort Caroiina.—Stanley Co., Small, 18. viii. 92. 
FLoriIDA.—John’s Pass, Tracy, no. 7794. 
LABAMA.—Colliert Co., Eggert, 21. v. 99, Tennessee River near South 
Florence (foliis infimis cum foliolis ad 3X1.5°™ magnis!). 
Louistana.—Port Eads, Tracy et Lloyd, no. 176. 
ARKANSAS.—Bertig, Trelease, 28. x. 97; Beaver Sta., Glatjelter, 18. vii. 
98; Herb. Engelmann, no. 298, July 1835 
Missouri.—Jasper Co., Trelease, nos. 195 et 201. (in 1897). 
ItLinors (southern).—Elsah, Reed, vi. 98. (an A. fruticosa var. humilis 
[Tausch] m. ?). 
10. A. ANGUSTIFOLIA Boynton, Biltm. Bot. Stud. 12139. 1902.— 
A. jruticosa var. subglabra Gray, Jour. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist. 62174. 
1850. 
A somewhat doubtful species, apparently connected with A. fruticosa (and 
probably also with A californica) by intermediate forms. BOoyNTON cites as 
synonym A. fruticosa var. angustifolia Pursh, Fl. Am.-Sept. 2: 466. 1814, but I 
think it is very difficult to decide what form PursH named var. angustifolia with- 
out having at hand his original hE He Eee no other locality of his A. 
fruticosa than “Carolina and Flori A. angustifolia he remarks, 
“vy. s. in Herb. Lewis.” Probably the var. angustifolia of “Pursh is the same as 
A. humilis Tausch, which is only a small form of typical A. jruticosa. The 
typical A. angustifolia according to BoyNTON has elliptic to linear-oblong leaflets 
which are distinctly acute at both ends. The fruits are as falcate as in A. jruti- 
cosa. In habit it very much resembles A. tennessensis, but that species has more 
numerous and more approximate leaflets, which are rounded or obtuse at each 
Texas.—New Braunfels, Lindheimer, no. 595; Kerr Co., Heller, no. 1596; 
Dallas Co., Eggert, 24. vi. 99 (cf. etiam sub A. californica); Mitchell Co., Eggert, 
. Vi. 00. 
