THE GERMAN CARP IN THE UNITED STATES. 535.15) 
use of an electric tuning fork giving a certain number of vibrations 
_per second, which was placed against a board end of the aquarium in 
which the fish were being tested. 
On the other hand, most fish ‘‘appear to be unaffected by loud talk- 
ing or other like noises originating in the air” (Parker, 1903, p. 45), 
due undoubtedly to the fact that the ordinary sound waves produced 
in the air are transmitted to the water to a very slight extent at most. 
Several years earlier Kreidl (1896) had performed certain experiments 
on trout in the fish basins of the Benedictine Monastery at Krems, 
Austria, where the fish were’ called up to be fed at the ringing of a 
bell. He found that the fish appeared just the same if a person went 
to the customary place without ringing the bell, and that no amount 
of bell ringing would bring them if the person remained out of sight. 
On this account Kreidl concluded that fish could not hear at ail. That 
sight is the important factor in the assembling of gold-fish to be fed 
was suggested by Seeley (1886) some ten years before, though he 
credited them with the ability to hear as well. He says (p. 112): 
Their sense of sound is sufficiently acute to obey a familiar call. The Chinese are 
said to assemble them in ponds at feeding-time in this way; but in ponds where vis- 
itors feed them in Europe they presumably detect the newcomer by sight; for we 
have noticed that a gathering never fails to greet visitors on their appearance at pub- 
lic gardens in which these fishes are exhibited. 
From ali this it appears that while fishermen, when desiring not to 
'. frighten the fish, need to be careful not to make disturbances which 
are transmitted directly to the water, such as splashing, or jarring a 
boat or similar object partially submerged, they need have little fear 
of talking; while, conversely, shouting probably has as little effect in 
helping to drive the fish, when that is the result desired. This fact 
will probably be received with satisfaction by those anglers who 
believed it necessary, but found it onerous, to maintain a sphinxlike 
silence while trying to outwit their finny prey. 
TASTE AND SMELL. 
As a matter of convenience these senses will be considered together. 
Of the two in fishes the former is much the better understood. 
Herrick (1903) has recently made an important contribution to the 
subject, besides giving an excellent review of the literature. It has 
long been known that carp have sense organs, known as ‘‘ terminal 
buds,” over the whole surface of the body and on the barbels, similar 
to those which oceur abundantly in the mouth, and to which the sense 
of taste has rightly been assigned. Direct physiological experiments 
have not been made on carp, but from his experiments on a large 
series of other fishes Herrick concludes (p. 266) that— 
It may be regarded as established that fishes which possess terminal buds in the 
outer skin taste by means of these organs and habitually find their food by their 
means, while fishes which lack these organs in the skin haye the sense of taste con- 
fined to the mouth. 
