NATTERER’S BAT. 247 
Srarrorp. — Near Burton (Garner, ‘ Nat. Hist. Staffordshire,’ 
p. 244). 
SuropsHire.— At Eyton, once (Kyton, Ann. Nat. Hist. 1840, 
p- 396). 
MERIONETHSHIRE. — Harlech Castle, July 1835 (Thompson, 
P. Z. 8. 1837, p. 52; Nat. Hist. Ireland, vol. iv. p. 2; and 
Kelsall, Zool. 1887, p. 346). 
LincontnsHire.—Rare, once near Grainsby, in July, 1876 (Caton- 
Haigh, Zool. 1887, p. 143). 
YorxsuirE.—Oakwell Wood, Birstal (Denny, Ann. Mag. Nat. 
Hist. 1840, p. 385; Clarke and Roebuck, Handb. York. 
Vert., p. 4). Harefield Wood, near Pateley Bridge (Zool. 
1884, p. 173). 
Dvurxam.—On a tree in Hoffal Wood (Meynell and Perkins, Cat. 
Mamm. Northumb. and Durham, p. 163), 
So far as we are aware Natterer’s Bat has not been met with 
in the three northernmost counties of England, namely, 
Northumberland, Cumberland, and Westmoreland ; and evidence 
of its occurrence is wanting for the following counties, namely, 
Lancashire, Cheshire, Derby, Nottingham, Bedford, Huntingdon, 
Rutland, Herts, Bucks, Surrey, Hereford, Gloucester, Somerset, 
and Wilts; though it is very likely we may have overlooked 
records for some of these counties. 
As regards Scotland this Bat is said to have been found near 
Edinburgh (ef. ‘ Proc. Glasgow Nat. Hist. Soc.,’ vol. iv.); and a 
specimen procured at Inverary, Argyllshire, was presented to the 
British Museum by his Grace the Duke of Argyll. 
In Ireland it is reported to have been obtained near Ennis- 
kerry, Co. Wicklow (Mangan, ‘Report Nat. Hist. Soc. Dublin,’ 
1844, p. 18), and near Dublin (McCoy, Ann. and Mag. Nat. 
Hist., vol. xv., first series, 1845, p. 270; Leith Adams, Proc. 
Roy. Dublin Soc., 1878; and Barrington, ‘Guide to Co. 
Dublin, its Geology, Fauna, &c.,’ 1878, p. 90). In the summer 
of 1853 nine full-grown specimens were taken by Dr. Kinahan 
and Mr. F. Haughton, from a hole in Tankardstown Bridge, 
which crosses the River Barrow near Levitstown, on the borders 
of Kildare* and Queen’s County (Zool. 1858, pp. 4012, 4013). 


* As regards Kildare see ‘ Dublin, Nat. Hist. Review,’ vol. vi., 1859. 
