672 GKAMMAK OF THE KLAMATH LANGUAGE. 



a constriictio ad sensum, of which a phonetic parallel exists exemplified by 

 me under "Assimilation," page 233. It might also be called syntactic 

 attraction wherever no omission of terms has taken place as in the seventh 

 example below. 



ga-ulipkan e-ushtat gunigshtat landing on the opposite shore of the lake, 



Mod., where e ushtat stands for d-ush. 

 gdmpgli uk Kamush Aishisham shu'luatnan ICmiiJcamtch went home 



dressed in AishisKs garments, Mod. myth. Here shulotish garments 



has to be supplied between Aishisham and shu'luatnan. 

 ka-i 1 watsani tchi'kluapk wiinniki'sham you shall not ride a stranger^ s 



horse, 58, 1 1 ; where wats would be the correct form, 

 katok ni ge-u siigsii'wa I think I told my truth, 65, 7 ; stands for : " I 



told the truth as I think it to be." 

 , Modoki'shrish shishukshe'mi at the time of the Modoc war, 55, 19; lit. 



"at the time of the Modocs being fought by the Americans," the 



latter, Boshtinam, being omitted from the sentence, 

 niitak hunk shlcpapka gt^-utantkak liilpatko I observed with my own 



eyes. Here lulpatko ("having eyes") is made to agree with niitak 



myself, whereas the correct form would be liilpatka ivith eyes, by 



eyes, forming agreement with gd-utantka ak. 

 tdlak ge-u my arrow, instead of tulak shiukish gd-u the arrow that killed 



me, 138, 1. 



Tautology repeats a word, phrase, or idea by using not the same words, 

 as is done by anaphora, but synonymous or equivalent terms : 



lil' a nat wak ka-a, lil' nat wjik galdsawia-a ! we do not know how to act, 



not liow to approach! 22, 2. 

 tua ni wak giug shiukuapk ? ivhy should I have killed himf 64, 9 ; why 



is here repeated twice. 



