INTRODUCTION 13 



All four classes are put in a single list, with the names of 

 authors arranged alphabetically, and the works of each (if more 

 than one) chronologically. In many cases, especially where the 

 title itself is not sufficiently clear, enough explanatory notes are 

 added to indicate the relation of the paper to the subject under 

 discussion, or to guide the reader to additional sources of infor- 

 mation. Many of the papers are referred to farther on in the 

 catalogue, by author and number (e.g., Beadle 3, Mohr 5). The 

 abbreviations of names of states, serials, etc., probably need no 

 explanation. 



Andrews (Miss; E. F. 



1. Agency of fire in propagation of long-leaf pines. — Bot. Gaz. b4 :497- 

 508, figs. 1-5. Dec. 1917. 



2. The relation between age and area in the distribution of plants. — 

 Science 11.47:142-143. Feb. 8, 1918. 



(Refers to the rapid spread of Japanese honeysuckle (Loiiicera Ja- 

 ponica) in the southeastern states.) 



3. The Japanese honeysuckle in the eastern United States. — Torreya 

 19:37-43. 1919. 



Ashe, W. W. 



1. Chestnut in Tennessee. — Tenn. Geol. Surv., Bull. 10 B. 35 pp. 1912. 



2. Yellow poplar [Liriodendron] in Tennessee. — Tenn. Geol. Surv., 

 Bull. 10 C. 56 pp., 8 half-tones in text. 1913. 



3. Loblolly or North Carolina pine [Pinus Taeda]. — N. C. Geol. Surv., 

 Bull. 24. 169 pp., 2 maps in text, 27 plates. 1915. 



4. Magnolia cordata and other woody plants. — Bull. Torrev Bot. Club 

 54:579-582. 1927. 



(See also Foster & Ashe, Greeley & Ashe, Pinchot & Ashe.) 



Bailey, L. H. 



1. C\'clopedia of .American Horticulture. — Quarto, 4 vols., 1900-1902. 



2. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture.— 6 vols., 1914-1917. (Re- 

 vised 1922.) 



(These two works are useful for indicating which of our woody plants 

 are cultivated for ornament, etc.) 



Bates, F. A. (AI. D.) 



Indigenous botanv of Perrv County. — Proc. Med. Assoc. State of Ala.. 

 6:58-68. 1853. 



(Medicinal plants mostly. Includes some cultivated species, and a few 

 whose occurrence in Perry County is very improbable.) 



Beadle, C. D. 



1. Studies of Crataegus.— Botanical Gazette, 28:405-417. "Dec. 1899." 

 (Describes seven new species, all but one credited to Alabama, but none 



confined to the state.) 



2. Studies in Crataegus. II.— Bot. Gaz. 3:355-346. Nov. 1900. 

 (Describes ten species, all new, seven known only from Alabama, and 



two from Alabama and other states.) 



