bo 
or 
MR. A. G. BUTLER ON THE SPHINGID, 62: 
16. NEPHELE METAPYRRHA. 
Zonilia metapyrrha, Walker, Lep. Het. viii. p. 196. no. 10 (1856). 
Deilephila dali, Newman, Trans. Ent. Soc. 2nd ser. vol. iv. p. 54 (1857), 
Moreton Bay (Gibbons). Type, B.M. 
It is possible that this may prove to be a variety of the preceding. I think, however, 
considering their differences, Mr. Walker would scarcely have been justified in uniting 
them, there being only one example of each in the collection. 
17. NEPHELE VAU. 
Zonilia vau, Walker, Lep. Het. iii. p. 197. no. 11 (1856). 
Var. Zonilia schimperi, Lucas, Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 3m sér. tom. y. p. 603, pl. 13. fig. 1 (1857). 
(Kartoum) Abyssinia (Lucas) ; —? Type, B.M. 
The figure by Lucas represents the species as much redder than our example, but 
does not otherwise differ. 
Zonilia antipoda, rhadama, and zebu of Boisduval appear to be MS. names (¢f. p. 630). 
18. NEPHELE ? FAVILLACEA. 
Anceryx favillacea, Walker, Lep. Het. Suppl. v. p. 1856 (1866). 
Zambesi river. 
SPHINGINAE incerte sedis. 
Genus 21. Catymnta, Walker. 
Calymnia, Walker, Lep. Het. viii. p. 123. gen. 12 (1856). 
CALYMNIA PANOPUS. 
Sphinx panopus, Cramer, Pap. Exot. iii. p. 50, pl. 224. figs. A, B (1782). 
Amblypterus panopus, Hiibuer, Verz. bek. Schmett. p. 133. no. 1430 (1816). 
Smerinthus? panopus, Westwood, Cab. Orient. Ent. p. 13, pl. 6. fig. 2 (1848). 
_ Calymnia panopus, Walker, Lep. Het. viii. p. 124. no. 1 (1856). 
Java (Horsfield); Ceylon (Cuming); North India (James). BM. 
This genus, as shown by Horsfield and Moore’s figures of its earlier stages, clearly 
belongs to the Sphinginz ; in general coloration, however, it is far more like Ambulya. 
Genus. 22. Entema, Clemens. 
Ellema, Clemens, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 1859, p. 187. 
1, ELLEMA CONIFERARUM. 
Sphinx coniferarum, Smith & Abbot, Lep. Ins. Georg. p. 81, pl. 41 (1797). 
