G. Jones on the Zodiacal Light. 165 
advise any one to draw conclusions from exceptions, in a matter 
where mistakes can be so easily made by the observer, but only 
from the general facts of this book; Ihave put down all, excep- 
tions and incongruities as well as others, not feeling authorized 
only be the case where his latitude is equal to the sun’s de- 
Clination, but on the opposite side of the equator. I saw this 
hothing to do with the results, I have been puzzled to know 
by what kind of lines to designate the boundaries of this mid- 
Might light; for it was very dim, quite as much so as the Diffuse 
ght; yet when I came to bound it by lines of dashes, I found 
they produced confusion when the Diffuse Light itself was 
marked down; so I gave it a line of alternate dashes and dots, 
and thus it is designated in the charts. gicuts ; 
metime early in 1854, I saw in a newspaper a brief notice 
only in amazem. 
&ave abundant e 
and changes I h 
ales qu'elle fait i AE Me el] eit des variations réelles, outre 
at Pautre, quelle rego 
filles qui vewiiene de> rola sth se bs e des diverses dégres de la clarté re 
lob et du concours de la lumieré des astres, et méme de la wet ee des yeux 
oe Teeteur.” — Mémoi ademie Royale, tom. viii, pp. 163,164. 
* Unless, bate ote te ie Royale LNA Sg, ap 0 
we class this with what a German w 
