212 Historical. 



S. FaJilberg between 1785 and ISSi. 



I only saw Falilberg mentioned by 0. Sivartz in his Flora Indiae 



occidentalis with reference to a few plants from St. Barthe- 



lemy. 



(Herb. Swartz. Stockholm; herl). Tluuilicrg Upsala). 



Placide Diidiassaing de Fontbressis about 1848. 



P. D. de Fontbressis collected only a few plants in St. Eustatius; 



I saw the following mentioned in Grisrbach: Systematische Unter- 



suchungen iiber die Vegetation der Karaiben, insbesondere der 



Insel Guadeloupe: 



no. 16. Lepidium virginicum Tiinn. 



no. 22. Polanisia viscosa DC. 



no. 24. Capparis cynophalloplioi-a Linn. : attenuata. 



no. 162. Sida spinosa Linn. 



no. 286. Tribulus ma.ximuh Linn. (Kallstroemia maxima Wight 



et Arn.). 

 no. 386. Stylosanthes procumbens Sw. (Stylosanthes hamata Tau- 



bert). 

 no. 942. Cyphiacanthus barbadensis Ns. (Rucllia tuberosa Linn.), 

 no. 1047. Heliophytum indicum DC. (Heliotrnpium mdicum Linn.), 

 no. 1074. Lantana camara Linn, 

 no. 1076. Lantana involucrata Linn. 

 (Herb. Gottingen). 



B. A. Euphrasen 1788. 



B. A. Euphrasen in his: Beskrifning ofver Svenska vestindiska 

 on St. Barthelemi samt oarne St. Eustache och St. Christopher. 

 Stockholm 1798, makes also mention of a few plants from St. 

 Eustatius. I did not think it necessary to quote them here as, 

 according to the statement of Urban (Symbolae Antillanae I 

 p. 49) it is impossible to control the determination of Euphrasen. 



F. L. VHerminier 1815. 



M. D. Feenstra about 1836. 



The few botanical data I could take from his: De Nederlandsche 

 West-indische eilanden in derzelver tegenwoordigen toestand, Am- 

 sterdam, 1836 — 1887 are of no use to the Systematic Part. In de.s- 

 cribing the vegetation in the Tiiird Part I shall say something 

 about this paper of Feenstra. 



