534 REPORT—1863. 
Report, 216, Scalaria Ochotensis [appears an aberrant Opalia; but is the genus 
Aeirsa of Morch, closely allied to Mesalia, teste A. Ad.}. 
216. Crepidula Sitchana [is figured like the young of grandis; but the 
specimens in Mus. Cum., when compared with the similar stage of 
C. excavata, display no differences either inside, outside, or in the 
nuclear whorls ]. 
216. Crepidula minuta eee the young of C. navicelloides, Nutt. ] 
216. Crepidula grandis [fossil at Sta. Barbara,=C. princeps, Conr. Can 
hardly be distinguished from very fine specimens of C. fornicata, 
sent from Halifax, Nova Scotia, by Mr. Willes]. 
217. Trichotropis cancellata, Has. {is quite distinct from 7. borealis). 
217. Purpura decemcostata, Midd. { =P. canaliculata, Ducl. Var. =P. at- 
tenuata, Rve. Var.=P. analoga, Fbs. } 
217. Tritonium (Trophon) clathratum, Ln. [is distinct from the shouldered 
M. multicostatus, Esch.,= Gunneri, Loy. }. 
217. Tritonium (Fusus) decemcostatum [= Chr. Middendorfii, Cooper= 
Chr. liratus, Martyn. | 
218. Tritonium (Buccinum) cancellatum [Midd., non) Lam. [=Priene 
Oregonensis, Redf. P. cancellata is the Cape Horn species. Some 
specimens in alcohol in Sir E. Belcher’s collection, however, said 
to be from Icy Cape, greatly resemble the southern wor 
218. Tritoniwm (Pollia) scabrum [is exclusively a 8. American shell. Dr. 
M.’s shell may have been Ocinebra, var. aspera]. 
218. Pecten rubidus, Hds. [non Martyn, =P. Islandicus, Mill. Midd.’s pl. 13. 
f. 1-8 are marked in expl. of plates “ Islandicus, var. Behringiana ;” 
they are probably (“rubidus, ?var.”) Hindsii. But the figs. 4-6 
are certainly the young of Hinnites giganteus |. 
219. Venerupis gigantea. {Decorticated specimens of Saridomus squaldus. 
219. Petricola gibba. {Elongated form of cylindracea, Desh., = carditoides,vay. 
219. Machera costata. [The figures represent M. patula, Dixon. ] 
220. Cingula minuta |“ is quite distinct from Hydrobia ulve,” teste Gld.]. 
220. Velutina eryptospira. [Probably a Lamellaria. ] 
220. Purpura Freycinettii, Desh. [is quite distinct from attenuata, Rve. It 
is doubtful whether Midd.’s shells belong to Desh.’s species]. 
221. Terebratula frontalis, Midd. 1851, named in 1849, [may be the young 
of Waldheimia Coreanica, Ad. & Rve., 1850,= Terebratella miniata, 
Gld., 1860, teste A. Ad., Rve.}. 
221. Astarte lactea, Gld. [is distinct from A. Scotica, teste Gld.]. 
221. Tellina fusca, Say [is distinct from 7. solidula, though it may= T. bal- 
thica ; teste Gld. Macoma inconspicua, Br. & Sby., is distinct from 
both]. 
222. Lyoni hyalina [is distinct from L. Norvegica]. 
222. Machera costata, Say. [Dr. Gould does not believe that any of Midd.’s 
synonyms belong to this species. Solen medius, in Br. Mus., appears 
=S. ambiguus, Lam., as figured by Swains. It is not a Machera.] 
45. Samarang.—Litorina castanea, Ad. & Rve., 1850. “Eastern Seas,” 
p. 49, pl. 11. f. 8 [appears identical with Z. Sttchana, Phil.]. 
46. E. B. Philippi.—Columbella teniata, Phil., 1846 [is probably identical 
with Anachis Gaskoinei, Cpr. But C. teniata, Ad. & Rve., 1850, is perhaps 
a Nitidella}. 
47. The “ Mexican War Naturalisis.”—These were Major Rich and Lieut. 
Green. Col. E. Jewett was not connected with the war, as would be supposed 
from the introduction to Dr. Gould’s pamphlet. The following corrections 
apply to the new species tabulated in Rep., pp. 226-228. The species of Gould 
bear date April 1852 (teste Otia, p. 184) and Noy. 1851 (Otia, p. 210); the 
others, July 1856. 
No. 
3. Corbula polychroma [ = C. biradiata, vav.]. 
7. Tellina tersa [= Macoma nasuta, jun. Cal., not Pan. }. 
