62 THE FLORA OF THE AMBOY CLAYS. 
Abietineze, but beyond this I have not felt justified in proceeding, and have 
decided to admit it without further comment—A. H. 
ANGIOSPERM 2. 
DICOTY LEDONEA:, 
Order JUGLANDACE. 
JueLans arctica Heer?. 
Pl. XX, fig. 2. 
Juglans arctica Heer, Fl. Foss, Arct., Vol. VI, Abth. I, p. 71, Pl. XL, fig. 2; Pl. XLT, 
fig. 4c; Pl. XLII, figs. 1, 2a, b, 3; Pl. XLII, fig. 3. 
Among the fossil leaves collected, a single one, almost complete and 
beautifully preserved, seems to be different from anything else in the col- 
lection. I have given a figure of it and refer it provisionally to the above- 
named species. This will be found represented in a number of figures in 
Heer’s Flora Fossilis Arctica (loc. cit.). These figures differ considerably 
among themselves, the first one especially representing the base of a much 
broader and more rigid leaf than the others; but Professor Heer doubtless 
had other material which guided him in his union of these specimens as one 
species. The figures given on Pl. XLII are very much more like our plant, 
and fig. 1, although imperfect at the summit, is nearly its counterpart. 
With this are the aments and a nut which seem to justify fully the reference 
of the leaves to Juglans. 
Locality: Woodbridge. 
Order MYRICACEAS, 
Myrica EMARGINATA Heer?. 
Pl. XLI, figs. 10, 11. 
Myrica emarginata Heer, Fl. Foss. Arct., Vol. VI, Abth. IT, p. 66,,P1. XLI, fig. 2; Pl. 
XLVI, fig. 12e. 
Although our specimens have not the exact obovate outline of Heer’s 
species, as represented in Flora Fossilis Arctica, Vol. VI, Abth. I, PL 
XLI, fig. 2, the comparison seems to be sufficiently close to warrant a 
provisional reference to it. No indication of name or locality accompanied 
these figures or their corresponding specimens.—A. H. 
