396 REPORT—1890. 
II. Species which, though somewhat peculiar, approach the nearest to the 
following. 
1. Stomatopora gracilis (?), Edwards. Unlike the S. gracilis, Edw., of 
the Upper Chalk. 
2 Ks divaricata, Romer. 
3. 35 granulata, Edw. 
4, As “5 var. incrassata, d’Orb. 
D. a ramea, Blainy. 
6 ie longiscata, d’Orb. 
7 is linearis, d’Orb. 
8. Proboscina angustata, d’Orb. 
$3 5 rugosa (P), d’Orb. 
10. 55 Bohemica, Novak (near). 
11. ‘5 Toucasiana (?), d’Orb, 
12. ” ramosa (?), d’Orb. 
13. Diastopora radians (?), Novak. 
14. 45 papillosa (?), Reuss. 
15. Unitubigera papyracea, d’Orb. 
16. Ceriopora micropora,! Goldf. 
17. Reptomulticava simplex, d’Orb. 
18. _ collis, d’Orb. 
19. Zonopora variabilis, d’Orb. : 
20. - irregularis, d’Orb. 
21. Multicrescis variabilis, d’Orb. 
22, Unicavea collis, d’Orb. (Actinopora collis, d’Orb.). 
23. Membranipora (?) simplex, d’Orb. (Hippothoa simplex, d’Orb.). 
24. 5 fragilis (?), d’Orb. 
25. 5 elliptica (?), d’Orb. 
26. 35 obliqua, d’Orb. 
Oe et ee ee 
Besides the above, I have a few examples of Red Chalk Polyzoa which 
are still undescribed on account of their fragmentary condition, and laid 
aside in the hope of better material turning up. 
There is still very. much to be done in describing the Polyzoa of the 
Cretaceous beds, and it seems to be useless as yet to prepare lists of 
species found in the Upper Chalk of Great Britain. I have already in my 
possession a quantity of material to describe from the Chalk overlying the 
Red Chalk of Hunstanton, and from the Upper White Chalk of Chatham 
and elsewhere. I may be allowed to say in conclusion, that I am prepar- 
ing a Monograph of the Cretaceous Polyzoa, and that any assistance given 
to me, either by the loan of examples, or by lists of species in local 
museums, will be thankfully received and fully acknowledged. 
* In these lists I have left out the ELxtalophora (2) sp. and Heteropora (2) sp. of 
my paper. 
