68 Charles William Wallace 
all thefe partyes to aunfwere to fuche Interrogatoryes on ether 
fyde to be mynyitered as by theire councell Learned fhould be 
mynyftered vnto them and vpon theire depofycions wee maye 
better proceede to examyne the pretended contemptes As by the 
fame Certyficate maye appere It ys ordered That the matter be 
agayne Referred to the faid Mt D™ Stannop and M* Dt Legg and 
aucthoryty ys geven vnto them by this co™ to call all the faid 
perions named in the faid Certyfycate or reporte and to examyne 
them vpon theire othes vpon fuche Interrogatoryes as ys men- 
cioned in the faid reporte To thend this co™ maye the better be 
enformed towching the faid fuppofed contempt/ 
[Thus the whole case was placed in the hands of the two Masters in 
Chancery, Dr. Legg and Dr. Stanhope, to be heard and determined. 
Accordingly, they examined many witnesses during the succeeding year. 
It is not practicable to arrange the depositions in exact chronological 
order, because some of the five following sets of them were taken con- 
currently with others. They are here placed, therefore, in the order in 
which they were filed by the Court, the depositions of Hyde, Myles, 
Bishop, and Allen, mentioned in the above report, coming next to the last, 
and their cross-examinations in behalf of the Burbages, last, in the series 
of examinations in this case. | : 
BRAYNE VU. BURBAGE 
Chancery Town Depositions, Bdl. 226, No. 9, Michaelmas 33 
and 34 Elizabeth (150r). 
INTERROGATORIES 
William Clerk iuratus 
25 Feb I59I coram 
Mat Carew 
Articles to be myniftered vpon the parte apd behaulf of James 
Burbage and Cuthbert Burbage Defend'** againft Margaret 
Braines the executrixe of John Braynes Complaynante, to Giles 
Allyn gentelman, Bryan Ellame, Richard Hudfone, [John Greges, 
68 
