The First London Theatre 127 
ment & ordre/ w™ he thinketh to be about A yere paft in the 
hearing of one Nycholas Bifhopp/ this depot & others/ And the 
other wordes fpoken by him/ menconed in the fame 13 Jnterroga- 
tory of his faid former Examinacion/ viz. I care not for three 
of the beft lordes of them all/ were vttered by him in the At- 
tyring houffe/ or place where the players make them readye about 
viij daies next after/ in the hearing of one James Tunftall this 
depot and others/ And this for his true anfwer to all thefe 
Jnterrogatories/ 
[Signed] Jo" Allein 
[When Dr. Legg and Dr. Stanhope were ready to make their report 
after considering the preceding voluminous evidence, namely, in April, 
1503, Widow Bayne died, and the suit naturally died with her. But by 
her will, dated 8 April, 1593, and proved 3 May, following, she left her 
supposed interest in the Theatre and all her possessions to Robert Myles. 
Thereupon, as legatee and executor, Myles filed a bill of revivor, which is 
lost, and the case proceeded to the end in his name. | 
BRAINE V. BURBAGE 
Idem. Bdl. 226, No. 11. Trinity 34 Elizabeth (15092). 
Jo: Grigges et Robertus Myles 
jurati 29 Julij 1592 coram 
Jo: Hone./ 
Intergatories to be mynyitred on the parte and 
behalf of Margarett Braynes Wydowe Complay- 
naunte agaynit James Burbadge, Cuthberte Bur- 
badge, and others Defendan'*®./ 
. Imprimis whether doe ye knowe the partye Complaynante Mar- 
garett Brayne, and James Burbadge, and Cuthbert Burbadge and 
other the Defendantes, ye or no. Yf fo then whether doe ye 
not knowe one Gyles Allyne gentleman ye or no, And whether 
was not he feazed of a vacante peace of grounde a Myll howfe, 
127, 
