264 Charles William Wallace 
did not Complayne but fynce the tender of the faid drafte of the 
newe leafe./ And hath hard the defendt faye that James Bur- 
badge was A troblefome tenant./ but he hard him not fynd falte 
w® him nor Complayne of him for non repayringe of his houfes./ 
And more he Cannot depofe./ 
8./ To the viij* Jnterrogatory this deponent faythe he knowethe that 
the faid James Burbadge did affigne his Jnterefte and terme in 
the premiffs demifed vnto him vnto one John Hide for a fome of 
money./ And as he remembrithe yt is about ffyfteene yeres paite 
fythence the fame affignemt made./ And there weare about fyf- 
teene yeares to Come and vnexpired in the faid leafe at the tyme 
of the faid affignem' And more he Cannot depofe./ 
[Signed] By me Robart Miles 
Raphe Myles of the parifhe of Whyte Chapple in the Countye of 
Middlefex gentleman of the Age of thirtye fyve yeres or there 
aboutes fworne and examyned the daye and yeare abouefaid de- 
pofithe and faythe 
1/ To the ffirfte Jnterrogatory this deponent faythe he hath hard that 
James Burbadge the Complaimantes father did in his lyffe tyme 
tender vnto the defendant the drafte of A newe leafe of Certayne 
houfes and groundes formerlye demifed by the defendant vnto 
James Burbadge and that James Burbadge required the defendt 
to Seale the fame newe leafe./ but what anfwere the defendt 
made the plaintiffes father when he demaunded to feale the fame 
he knoweth not nor hath hard./ And more he Cannot depofe 
touchinge the faid Jnterrogatory for that the drafte of the newe 
leafe mencioned in the Jnterrogatory is not lefte to be fhewed 
him neyther hath he feene yt at any tyme./ 
2./ To the fecond Jnterrogatory this deponent faythe that James Bur- 
badge beftowed muche money in alteringe mendinge and repayr- 
inge the premiffs demifed vnto him by the defendt, but howe 
muche he knowethe not, nor whether he beftowed that Cofte win 
264 
