Utricularia ochroleuca Hartm. in Yorkshire. 19 
and ‘A Post-Permian Fault at Cusworth, near Doncaster ;’ 
and summaries of his papers have also appeared in The 
Geological Magazine, The Colliery Guardian, and in the Reports 
of the British Association. 
In Mr. Culpin the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union has lost a 
keen supporter ; geological science has lost a devoted worker ; 
but the greatest loss of all falls upon his widow, with whom 
we feel sure every reader of this journal sympathizes and 
trusts that her two sons and daughter may bring her com- 
fort in her future lonely road through life.—T-.S. 
fos 
UTRICULARIA OCHROLEUCA HARTM. IN YORKS. 
ARTHUR BENNETT, 
Croydon. 
Tuts plant which was described by Hartman in the Botaniska 
Notiser, pp. 25-32 (1857), I possess from 16 Counties of 
Scotland, Westmorland (Fox sp.), and Dorset (Linton, sp.), 
L. Lancashire (Coomber sp.), Mr. Martindale, of Kendall, 
now writes me that he has specimens from Strensall Common 
(V.C. 62) gathered in 1881 by the late Mr. George Stabler. 
Mr. J. G. Baker in North Yorkshire, Tvansactions Yorkshire 
Naturalists’ Union, part 17, 1891, pp. 355, gives only U. 
vulgaris L., and U. minor L., not naming intermedia 
Hayne. Every specimen named intermedia should be 
carefully examined, and most will probably prove to be ochro- 
leuca. At present I have only seen intermedia from Norfolk 
(Messrs. Burrell & Clark, sp.), and E. Perth, Sturrock sp. in 
Perth Museum, it is evidently rare ; probably will be found to 
be most abundant in Ireland. 
U. ochroleuca may be distinguished from intermedia by 
possessing bladders here and there on the leaves (as well as on 
separate stems) which intermedia never has. The winter-buds 
in ochroleuca are densely hairy, the leaves have marginal and 
apical hairs with compound cells at the base, intermedia has 
simple hairs, and the apex of the leaves generally rounded with 
a mucro, not acute-acuminate as generally in  ochroleuca. 
Notes on ochroleuca will be found in Annals Scottish Natural 
History (1903), pp. 123-251, and Tvansactions of Edinburgh 
Botanical Society (1910), p. O61. 
Mr. F. A. Lees, in The Flora of West Yorkshire, p. 373, 
remarks that the Askham Bog plant, has been suggested to be U. 
neglecta Lehm. There are specimens of neglecta (U. major 
Schmid.) in the Cardiff Museum Herbarium from “ Potteric 
Carr.’ Unfortunately I did not record the gatherer. 
In the Edinburgh Herbarium there are specimens from 
Chat Moss, Herb, Tatham ex. W. Armstead, under the name of 
vulgaris. This is V.C. 59, S. Lancashire. 
1913 Jan. 1. 
