Shakespeare and his London Associates 33 



iendant promissed to gene the plaintiff Any pora'on of monney 

 w th his daughter Mary in marriadge nor howe much he promissed 

 yf he promissed any, nor knoweth vppon what promise the 

 Complt contracted him selfe w th the said Marye/. And more he 

 Cannott depose. 

 5/T0 the ffyfte Interr this deponnt sayth that after the plaintiffes 

 marriadge w th the said Marye, he this deponent went to see them, 

 And the plaintiff vppon some speeches betweene this deponent 

 and the plaintiff the plaintiff tould him that the defendant had 

 geuen him w th his daughter in marriadge the some of ten pounds? 

 and Certayne houshould stuff e, but the vale we of the houshould 

 stuffe he knoweth not./ And more he Cannott depose./ 



Nouel Montioi 



[27] 



Witness Book, 44 Elizabeth to 16 James I, Miscellaneous Books, 

 vol. ipp. 



[The Court's list of witnesses examined ex parte Mountjoy, Trinity 

 Term, 1612.] 



Xpofer Mountioy 

 deft 



Stephen Bellott 

 plaintiff 



Xpofer Weaver 

 Nowell Mountioy 

 Thomas fflower. 



[28] 



INTERROGATORIES. — THIRD SET. 



[Ex parte Mountjoy, for 23 June, 1612. Written on parchment, and 

 attached to the following depositions.] 



Interrogatories to be ministred vnto witnesses 

 produced on the parte and behalf of Christo- 

 pher Mountioy defendant to the bill of Com- 

 playnt of Stephen Bellott Comp. u ./ 



293 



