356 Dr. A. G. Butler on the 
PLATE V. 
Cletodes abyssicola, sp. n. 
Fig. 1. Female, dorsal view (a and 4, dorsal spines seen in profile), x 100. 
2. One of the antennules, x 250. 3. One of the antenne, 
600. 4. Mandible and palp, x 760. 5. Second maxilliped, 
760. 6. Foot of first pair, x 500. 7. Foot of fourth pair, 
340. 8. Fifth foot, x 250. 
xX X 
Cletodes Brucei, sp. n. 
Fig. 9. Female, dorsal view, x 106. 10. Foot of fourth pair, x 250. 
11. Fifth foot, x 580, 
PxLatE VI. 
Parartotrogus Richard, T. & A. Scott, var. arctica. 
Fig. 1. Female, dorsal view, xX 80. 2. One of the antennules, x 190. 
3. One of the antenne, x 190. 4, Mandible, x 580. 
5. Maxilla, x 253. 6. First maxilliped, x 127. 7. Second 
maxilliped, x 127. 8. Foot of first pair, x 170. 9. Foot of 
second pair, X 123. 10. Foot of third pair, x 123. 11. Foot 
of fourth pair, x 500. 12. Fifth foot, x 380. 15. Abdomen 
and caudal furca, x 84. 14. One of the antennules, male, 
x 190. 15. Abdomen and caudal furca, male, x 84. 
XLVI.—WNotes on the Genera Tanaecia and Nora, with 
Descriptions of new Species. By ArtHuR G. BUTLER, 
Ph.D. &e. 
I accept the genus Tanaecia as restricted by Dr. F. Moore 
in his ‘Lepidoptera Indica,’ with the addition of certain 
species placed by him in the genus Nora; I also omit 
Adbolias indras of Vollenhoven (which is undoubtedly the 
female of Nora ramada). 
With regard to Herr Friihstorffer’s list (Berl. ent. Zeit. 
xliv. pp. 127-129), it appears to me that his attempt to 
group the species is much marred by his failure to appreciate 
the characters afforded by pattern. In his action with regard 
to T. violaria he is evidently guided by colour apart from 
pattern, this species being without question very closely 
related to 7. vikrama, but having little affinity to 7’. apsarasa ; 
the same is true of 7. Vordermannt. is supposition that 
T. orphne may be the male of TY. valmikis and T. aruna an 
aberration of 7’. pelea again shows that he has not appreciated 
the entirely different pattern of the groups of Tanaecia; as a 
matter of fact, I believe Z. aruna will prove to be Vollen- 
hoven’s J’. varuna, or, at best, a very closely related local 
form thereof. Of 7. orphne we have both sexes. 
