A94. Mr. F. Pickard-Cambridge—A Revision 
In this work the name £. apoclisa is definitely attached to 
a species which is obviously the Ar. cornutus, Clerck, and not 
Ar. patagiatus, Clerck (see Audouin’s plate). 
In 1864 Simon removed EH. umbratica to his new genus 
Nuctenea in Hist. Nat. Ar. p. 261, leaving E apoclisa im as 
the type. EE. apoclisa was removed at the same time to 
Neoscona, but later, on the same page of the same work. 
Type, Epeira apoclisa, Walckenaer,=£. foliata (Fourc.), 
1785.—Europe. 
TueEripion, Walckenaer, Tableau, p. 72 (1805). 
Twenty-seven species were originally referred to this 
genus :—lineatum, redimitum, ovatum, 4-punctatum, paykulli- 
anum, maculatum, peritum, variatum, sisiphum, nervosum, 
pictum, denticulatum, tinctum, pulchellum, carolinum, lepidum, 
venustum, crypticolens, triangulifer, punctatum, urtice, alveo- 
lus, obscurum, signatum, benignum, aphane, incertum. 
It was not, however, limited definitely in any way between 
the date of its establishment and 1810, when Latreille defi- 
nitely selected Ar. redimita, Linn., as the type. This species 
is the same as Ar. redimitus, Clerck (p. 59), a variety of 
Ar. lineatus, Clerck (p. 60) and of Ar. ovatus, Clerck 
(p. 58), whose names, however, have been dropped. 
Thorell (1869-70) quotes 7. sisyphium (Clerck) and Simon 
(1894, Hist. Nat. Ar. 2, 1. p. 550) TZ. lineatum (Clerck) as 
the type. 
Type, Theridion redimitum (Linn.), 1758.—Europe. 
Proucus, Walckenaer, Tableau, p. 80 (1805). 
Three species were originally mcluded, by name at any 
rate, under this genus :—(1) Pholcus phalangioides, Walck. ; 
(2) Aranea Pluchii, Scop. Ent. Carn. 404, 1120; (38) dr. 
opilionides, Schranck .. . . 1783. 
Another species was referred to as Geoff. t. il. p. 651. no. 17, 
but no name is given to it, and it is therefore not available 
as the type. 
In 1810 Latreille selected as the type “ L’araignée domes- 
tique 4 longues pattes,” Geoff., but without giving it a name. 
In 1869, Nov. 13th, Thorell selects Pluchii, Scop. 1763, as 
the type, and Simon, Hist. Nat. Ar. 2,1, p. 471 (1898), quotes 
phalangioides, Fuessl. 1775, as the type (originally spelt 
phalangoides). 
Latreille’s selection cannot stand. Thorell gives Pluchii, 
Scop., as questionably = phalangioides, Fuessl.; Simon regards 
them as distinct species (Ar. Fr. 1. pp. 259-261, 1874), and 
Thorell’s earlier selection stands. 
Type, Pholcus Pluchii, Scopoli, 1763.—Europe. 
