42 TIMEHRI. . ; is 
In Council, 6th August, 1672. 
Peers &c, v. Kincstanp.—Upon a writ of error brought by Hester 
Peers and VALENTINE HawTAlve (Attorneys to JoHN PEERS, Esqr.) to 
reverse a judgment obtaned agt. ye said Peers and one JouNaTHAN 
HawTAINE at ye suite of NarHt., Kincstanp Esgr., (upon a scire 
facias). It is ordered that the same be heard the first next Council day. 
JONATHAN HAWTAINE is also mentioned in later re- 
cords as having been associated with JOHN PEERS in 
some law proceedings, as appears from the following : 
In Council 14th May 1672. 
Present: Henry Haw ey, DANIEL SEARLE, 
Peers &c.—It is ordered that ye Clerke of y® Court of Comon 
Pleas for the precinéts of Christ Church doe against the next 
Council day being on the eleventh day of June followinge bringe to 
this Board all the Originall Records relating to the scire facias brought 
by NATHANIEL KinGsLanp ag*: Capt. JONATHAN HAWTAINE aes ici 
Pegrs, Esq. 
In 1679 JONATHAN and VALENTINE Haselael are 
recorded as having gone with their wives and families 
from Barbados to Jamaica, and settled onthe Northern 
side of the Island.* 
In 1679 JONATHAN HAWTAINE, gent. sold part of See 
acres of landin Jamaicato JOHN PEERS. This plantation 
was in St. Elizabeth’s pa‘tish and contained 600 acres. 
The Barbados records to which reference has been 
made, contain no further mention of the HAWTAINE 
family, but there were HAUGHTONS who may have been 
their descendants. 
It is desirable that West Indian Colonists should- 
follow the example of many of our American Co 
who take great interest in tracing the conneétion be- — 
tween the families of the Great Republic and those of — 
’ Archer’ monumental Sea ations, 
wv 
