Geological Society. 155 
above type, with the view of demonstrating its Scelidosaurian 
affinities. 
The greater part of the remains were referred by the author to a 
new genus, Cratwomus; some of these had been figured by Bunzel 
as “Crocodili ambigui,” and others as belonging to Scelidosaurus 
and to a new Laccrtilian genus, Danubiosaurus. To Crateomus 
he referred mandibles, teeth, vertebra from all parts of the 
column except the sacrum, dermal armour, and the chief bones of 
the limbs. Two species were distinguished, C. Paulowitschi and 
C. lepidophorus. The former, which is much the larger, was named 
in honour of M. Paulowitsch, who voluntarily superintended the 
work at Neue Welt. The author stated that he regarded these 
animals as carnivorous, and that, unlike the typical Wealden Dino- 
saurs, they were not Kangaroo-like in habit, but had strongly 
developed fore limbs, as indicated in the proposed generic name. 
Two teeth belonging to Megalosawrus were described as repre~ 
senting a new species, MM. pannoniensis, characterized by the crown 
being shorter and broader than in previously described forms. A 
fragment, regarded by Bunzel as the thoracic rib of a Lizard, was 
interpreted as the distal end of the femur of a Dinosaur, and 
named Ornithomerus gracilis. The lower jaw, described by Bunzel 
as Crocodilus carcharidens, of which a maxillary bone also occurs, 
was made the basis of a new genus, Doratodon, probably Dinosau- 
rian, judging from the lateral position of the apertures of the skull 
and the characters of the teeth. The genus Fhadinosaurus was 
founded upon the humerus and femur, the latter having been 
regarded by Bunzel as the dorsal rib of a Crocodile; the species was 
named R. alcimus. Oligosaurus adelus was described as presenting 
Lacertilian characters in combination with some Dinosaurian pecu- 
liarities. The remains include the humerus, femur and scapula, and 
two vertebrae, which were regarded by Bunzel as feetal vertebre of a 
Dinosaur. The genus Hoplosaurus was founded on some vertebra, 
fragments of limb-bones, and dermal armour; it shows, with 
distinctive peculiarities, a certain resemblance to Hyleosaurus. 
A proceelian Crocodile was represented by many parts of the 
skeleton—some figured by Bunzel as Lacertilian, others as Croco- 
dilian. It is remarkable for having a buttress supporting the trans- 
verse process in the lumbar region. ‘The author calls it Crocodilus 
proavus. ei 
The specimen figured by Bunzel as the ilium of his Danubiosaurus 
anceps was stated by the author to be a costal plate of a large Che- 
lonian, in which, apparently, the margins of these plates remained 
separate through life. Skull-bones believed to belong to the same 
animal are strongly sculptured. The author named the species 
Pleuropeltus lissus. Three or four species of Emvdiaus were said to 
be indicated by isolated plates, the largest of which was named 
Emys Neumayri. 
The only specimen referable with certainty to a Lizard is a small 
vertebra of elongated form, regarded as indicating a new genus and 
species, named Spondylosaurus gracilis, Of Pterodactyls there are 
IL kes 
