240 
[N° 15. 
the psn behind him, ortuguese. 
Varieties of rng oo =. etal son in their 
individual species : for instance, the co h gives most 
milk; the horse, which possess es most reetnens, docility, 
hich possess 
a particular colour : these es pair 
red with tease posses 
<< oduce similar offs; ori 
ro _ 
Sass 
like manner vegeta wil 
pregigeia.» i in nahi or disease-—Inda, 
Astron omical Discove ery. —M. Bess: sell, a German ast . 
nomer, 
times, by ag. art ascertained t © parallax of the do uble 
4 BI Cygni. He found “a repeated observations, 
made from August 1837 rch 1840, that the paral- 
lax. of a Cygni did. not exc 
that of pga 
re than hs es 000 years in g fro 
: : d if 2 » body could be "projeted Pia 
wh abe “s 
a 
F 
occupy at aye 96,000,000 years. 
merican A atl? —A Pennsylvania paper contains the 
caioied a E ye yesterday spoke of a Ha- 
nm, of ae pa ate, as Mr. 
gZ com weer 
aes +} . 
street ory is n poe 
A Sharp pe —A gre passing by a one 
mason’s bawled out to him ‘‘ Good morning, Mr. {as 
hard gt ses I st you finish your gravesto' ones a 
‘In the memory of,’ and ao. nee wait, I suppose 
 eaaitien of the Ches nut- 
who wants a monum hy, yes,’” poten 
e old man, resting | for a mome ent on his meets ; — 
peat a ep is 
ght on.”’ 
he F lower Painter—Maria Von Osterwyck, one of 
+ bad a lover. 
to whom she was a little partial, but his idleness and his 
ion distressed her much. oe length she one 
dissi 
gi on condition that during one 
he would work regularly ten acs yet observing, that 
it was only what she had done £ from early 
age. He agreed to the in, and took a ho’ posit 
to her, that she might tare his ind . Bat habit 
was too strong: either his love or his resolution failed, 
and he broke the one Bao consequently, refused 
to be his wife, and no e could ever after alter he 
determinatio the man ae had shown so 
—Wooed a id hen, oodlake, Helps, and 
al Committce of the mice ‘Council Rieme y 
se of hearing the appeal c: 
—— ‘ood, of Cioadeaber. 
of property involved, 
in it, has created very 
great and general parne 5 The Lords ee were, Lord Lyn ed 
hurst, the Master of the Rolls, the Vice-Chancellor, Mr. Tarn 
Littledale. were about 16 —— 
on 
Par CEL. 
others — “me Jadici 
which occasion when the Coun: 
met for the purpose of hearing the case, and adduced several 
cases to show that in principle it was no obj to ajudge’s 
hh acause peal that he had ged in it as 
counsel in the court below ; and that, as of it was 
as little to be taken fi ted that the opinions which he enter- 
a as an necessity continue to inftuenc 
his mind after he had e ajudge. Coming now to the case 
at present before the Court, tleman said, that 
the learned gentleman 
b> aaron ashe did for ae appalant he feit all the reese of 
r erage ea sa To ared out of all 
controversy that they were of a genuine character, that th 
ere deliberately executed by the testator for the p whic 
they professed to attain, and that there was wothing hatever to 
‘00 bore mics to be given entire; 
oy exproaniany ake aoa ee ee 
could fumgetibeaprr 2p aie ar a 
ton then follow om the same side, om behalf of the 
appellants, sed proceeded = 7 comment at length upon _ 
jadgmen which had been given in the below, and th 
rhie 
® pronouncéd therein | 
concluded his address 
out of ew al gpiions 
there were only four eggs and bacon, he went out tosupper. Mr. 
hae tate the pe not to clean his get witaces employed 
a man, Cronin paid him. At another supper witness 
aren fee ‘Sold tongue, but Mr. Cronin said it was Tor himself, 
and he m out again to supper if he liked; there was cold 
meat, ext morning he saw Mr. Cronin t his papers 
in his d ; he pushed witness, and mess in return pushed 
him. Witness told Mr. Cronin, if he ‘isted, he would put his 
desk on the floor. Mr. Cronin sent for liceman. Mr. Cronin 
nce \ living 
took a turn for the stage while he was with Mr. Cronin. Had 
pee he to to Mr. Webater es a Haymarket, and to the m: ag of 
the Bath theatre. Did lamage Mr. Cronin’s desk, but it put it 
posed to his father to refer 
ing all the premium 
you know . Ss examination con! d 
Shi before the scuffilé.—Re-examined: Mr. Cronin knew of his writ- 
below, whoever cli to be xt of kin would have to go to | ing to Mr. Webster. —By the Co ‘e partook of the’same pro- 
he Court below go through all the proceedings as if the pre- visions —Mr then addressed the jury, and 
suit had never been institut The learned-Counsel pro- | expressed his deep regret at the painful he had had to per- 
ceeded to address the Court at gr: eat le ngth, and h paint overated form, after the many offers that had m made to settle the 
at the close of the day, when t the Court rose and adjourned until ried | - in fa e that the j ula ide 
this Ser; 
s’ Court.—Valette v. the London Com: 
jock and fo. 
ile: prea and Mr. Bacon yet on the discolution deed, whi e jury had no power nor the court t s 
of an ex-par rte injunt ounines by the plaintiff, restrai the | indeed, Mr. Cronin were to take back the most unman: eable ap- 
Dock Company fro: g with out of their possession 75 hogs- prentice ver heard of, whose services were in ying 
eads of brandy, d also restraining the defendants, Mi orders, in ing desks, in refusing eat cold mutton, which 
Goldney, Magens, and Estenais, from selling the same, and also | the family , and in reciting in stationer’s shop. 
120 hogsheadsof Chateau ux,wine.—The defendant Magens only thing which the j could decide would be the injury for 
as introduced at Bordeaux by Count Valdez M. Vale’ 
Mr. Clarks en it ove! the saci as wy 
whom he obtained credit for the ——, and wine in dispute. prentice, and commented upon thi —The mdary said he 
wine was shipped for Engian ived in January last in quite agreed with Mr. Clarkson, that t the} jury could not efile this 
London Docks, where Mr. rte the other defendant, dispute unless the es to cel the indenture. Why 
vanced 650/. to Magens upon receiving the bills of lading and the | could it not be ?— irk: “sald had always been 
dock warrants. me representations had been made a; the ing to do so. He would leave it to the Secondary.— = 
cre Magens, whose bills to the Bordeaux merchants had | condary did not wish that. He formed a very strong opinion 
dishonoured, and they filed a bill — i parties de- | of the conduct of the apprentice, which had earch improper. 
fendants to the suit, and obtained the injun: The learned -| —It was at last pnt bre Par amt gay ould be 
counsel contended that the non-payment of ills. we s no proof of d a verdict taken by co. 
fraud in the transaction, and that the parties to them were good ; 
t therefore prayed ‘that the injunction should be dissolved — aga 
Piguott. for the defendant Goldney, contended that he | | 7ATTER Set Monday's quotation, 8, rp tga saad 
ing an innocent holder for le consideration, and with. bbe verre Paches area Te they were betted to a considerable 
ut any notice of the ni ve the injunction sie 3 
could not be tained as senna ae. Pemberton ant without exhausting ioe wre Sige snort ae 
Mr. Wigram, in support of th injanction, tated that the goods | 2.5 renters: Mme Kmght of the Whistle vai : o- 
had been ed in the dente fraudnlent manner of. the ry t t 20-t tw ‘ints 
quest, and three or four fifties were £0! on al ‘0.1; two poi 
plaintiff :—Magens bas rb himself to be ove o of a rich mer- loss were also taken, and, at the close, o uld lay more 
+ age rae sien sie evo meandioe » tA amas than 17 to 1. Prince Caradoc, Palemon, an or were in 
Agency ‘Com ompany of France,” quite as much force as on M y ; nor were the ahabites at 
the Rue de Richelieu, he being their pit ape a where they 
also had opened an establishment. The swm for which the goods spt ore eam Phengy cry kong abate a: 
ae Boe 20,000 a ee be paid = by — bills, poe oe ace sy favourable, and ina The feeling t ee 8 - 
e other by drafts from on demand and after delivery. | 54. of fiftee 2 ; ~ 
sorvines Eat ths ma 3 pes their t — 2 | little before 7 o’clock, as Sunder == 
. epee oe ae Two. ‘THOUSAND GUINEAS STAKES. 
either could not be found, or were be; were foisted on the to dagst V L agst Eringo (taken) 
Bordeanx merchants for payment; ant resentations of Ma. Bite? 
gens’s furniture having m sold in under executions ERBY. 
issued fi the nal de as being sent from this 3 to rego us (eabiea) 50 to LagstD - e ; ‘ell 
country, the present bill filed. mgst the affidavits de- bed ‘orth’s lo 1 
tailing the poverty of Magens, and that there did not exist in Paris spate ee  sgne = ae M4 is caeon ry = ee 
any such pany as that he rep ted himself to be agent for, lo to 1 Vv fr h (taken, | 1000 to 10 Morning Star (taken) 
was one by the notorious V! ‘ was contended that the t. 0 fr 24) : ie shoals hearts a +t 
whole cas mixed up with fraud, and thatthe suit mightas| ‘tel focalecs agg ie Se a Tineshecen taxes? 
well be abandoned as that the defendants a he power 20 to 1 Palemon 10 Minusand Met- 
of selling the wines and brandies. The injunction necessary 20 to 1 Prince Caradoc Seente h cohen 
to prevent this.—Mr. Kindersley replied, and aged that ifthe in-| 2 } Babe ae S90 even between | Prince 
junction were dissolved, the bills should not be used by the| 35% : Gulae (cakes) 600 to 500 and 500 to 400 on Roralie 
plaintiff against the defendant Magens as long as the goods were 26 to } Wah: agst Palsemon (tak.) 
retained.— ale recapitulated the case. He said that 33 to 1 a vanes) 1190 to 1000 on peor taal Wahab 
no answer had iven to the case presented by the plaintiffs ; 80 to ir Hans tt wats 
: {t.) 
1 esate a aa resum! so stro re car 
against the property coming into the hands of the persons legally 
entitled to it, if the injunction were dissolved, that he would not ee one spel yo Be ee Staffordshire, paper 
incur the isk, and would therefore order it to be retained until a ey ened, Tollite, bookseller, Liverpool—F, “ti miller, Bridlingtom, 
the the cause. His hip aght that it should | Yorkshire- ‘ 
ie an order of Court that no should be insti- Spel eas SUPE RSEDED ranfield, hester, innkee d 
tated onthe bills so long as the brandy and wine remained in the | , BA RKRUPES— Wi Prost Moun nee ndraper—J- Pidgeon, Birming- 
ade’ of the Court. It would be ar Fe ed —— sige be — ham, Jaceman—J. Dudding, Liverpool, paint: mannfacturet —G F Poppe = } 
th pail court.— em m, on 5 R. Popple, Kingston-upen-Hull, oil- : regadktsy mist iafalean, | 
client, undertook not to p part with the sig rW.'r-Bheime Newry Sennen y ecpcm Spetamiand, Bee 
Seconpanizes’ Court.—Butler v. ‘Cronin.—Mr. eee said the ial retnclder-_R. Jeferson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, yictualler and publican 
plaintiff was a gentleman of fortune, residing in the Kent. road, idmarsh, Cheltenham, mercer—W. Perry, Here’ » maltster- big 
and the defendant carried the bu an auctioneer in | house, Fartown, Hnddersficld, emeaien soa fi yee Lip aera 
ast-street, Lamb's Conduit-streek, argh gediy ex | Westmoreland, sili J Ankrett, grocer, Walsall, Staffordshire —H. Sane 
for a breach of co of the fe is ‘cconist, Leadenhall-street—J. B. New and FP. Nev, stati s mgd 
circumstances : —In March, org tbo son a oe plaintiff was ap- J. Morris, victualler, bo Saat ge Rear = waeid, 4 
prenticed to the defendant for —o betew one on ge rad busi- ‘te remo nor caterer t whe aioe Without Landy, sca 
fiom stated that the defendant had itted: breaches of the | Pat manaectarer inereoe <P Manchester. Roberts amd, Flowe, mal 
. 5 amie ee Re ae er, Brighton. 
deed thus entered into, by not treating the apprentice as one of | lisers, New Bridge street, Blackfr: , London—T.. Howell, builders mort 
_ Sone that he had not supplied him with sufficient board | SCOTCH ee eee sedate heres Cs OE 
d lodging, and that he had not instructed him as he was bound Bangh lcaler— Oo Mill, Sr aaeebaet 6. Grieve, Kerrow, Invern 
to. do. For the first year of the a a was ‘ ‘ony diallers 
treated, and the en; ent satisfactory to parties ; ees cnr 
but from that time 4 co! pe oyance was commenced. HS —On the 3ist ult., at Dynas Powis, Glamorganshire 
It first began because the apprentice gave a double’ knock at the Mes Bags of danghter—On Wednenday Inst, at Ciera) ay ine arages 
ee is boots. He Se JB Robineon, of a ron ogheer At 6, Basen. 
was not as before treated as one of the family, and ge enduring 4 the Ba inst., Mrs. W. E- ger ede s daughter. on e 3d cal 
this till last December, his desk was then opened, and his papers | Nor ley-street, the lady tock P, Wilson, Esq, ghtery 
locked over, and when Mr. Cronin was spoken to, = ‘was told to | bern. 0 slabeones, 3h 
Jeave the house. Since that time the apprentice had been living | ¢'New Orleans, eldest in lt 2 ee tke ee Soe: Goneshote, ri ot 
with his who now came before the jury for compensation, Ces te ieaner daughter of Thomas. J. Bond, of the former coy 
bi it could not be said the defendant was out of pocket for | Oa “seth ult., at Heston Church; James S: aoe ian ne ciater, of 
the apprentice’s board and lodging while he was with him. He agit cogent Pn n Saran Sater, a2 rteeag danghtes fost, at Trinity Church, 
Sas ca he wes eee ae Ra ogee | ey Hee Pep asa Breen ew 
aghter ~ D. 
ae Butler, the apprentice, young | road. of Joba Liver 
estan i uty eet es me nd bog - i200 he ah any ae Cire cat fy Ba Seer ma Tayiots 
ear and three m i¢ went home one ni and gave a? ted, Miss Taylor, youngest daughter e x on 
double knock at the d oor. fendant objected, and u | Fay. of Maze bill, Greenish, and _ of cag 7: er ane 
witness asking him why, as he had always done so, he replied he the 27th ult. T. V- Nope Esa. ‘On He gist ult., at Purney-heathy in 
never re th his apprentices. Witness told him he was Fae Foe taeptie sat en widow of the late John Sargent, Esq-» Laying 
his equal except being his apprentice. Witness had nothing to do peso | the ist inst-, at Whitchurch C Ss ee, Moe 
for some days. Mr. Cronin co: ined to witness’s fatht of | widow ee the Tarde Poe of Sodor org aap eet in Cl 
what he called his insub: ation. Mr. once said, when | Bachel €o! spans Parle, oe ‘Ann, the widow of the late 
had been to Brighton, that he was not for he could SES: edioed-coW ¥ 
eatas much as three moderate people. Sometimes there — 2 oer Sears 
dinn oe witness, Mrs. Cronin, and the chil- Evaxs, vé 
three nage ences eavune es zn patente a sia ed. by Messrs. zeae Seine 
Pa rg ne gg a. ier U all P Aavertisemen's and ‘Comsanictions art ie sldrened © sca 
rent, pies, but none y- pon one occasion _ USanasday, Agril 10, 1841, re 
4 for supper; but as a lady came in, and as 
