sion being raised in consequence.—The second readin: 
Jews’ ation Fill was bowak by the Marquis of B 
pers 
gh 
ons belongin 
He 
h 
a sec 
The Archbishop of C.inren mace said “that it was alwa 
hi e 
ways with 
whic! “yt as to relieve 
hic! 
e of fraud and imposture. T! ge: yas 
dto the admission of Jews 
s 
THE GARDENERS’ 
posed to them, Saray still think Ministers constitutionally en 
titled to a rebar to the country. the people chose | bse ag their 
own cl e retir 
he arom at greatlength in Gowsioeacatibns Ao ae bee = 
neral policy of Government.— LLAC id that if, at the 
general election, the Queen’s name had been put forward by 
He Lil y, it was only in admiration of that solicitude 
which her Majesty was believed to ent in, to see equal justice 
done to all hersubjects. On the other hand, the Queen’s name 
ad by the Tory party been coupled wi se. Theinterests of 
people, he would maintain, were pro: ed nm, an 
gave niste: credit for the opportunity bites 
selves 
really sincere in that resolution, if they thoug! nt the measure as- 
rote dio it indispensable to the good of the cont 
acted upon it for six pan ? Why, bec: 
with ho ete vetaar of chur 
= cannaions fata 
oes ones Then 
miotio. Sority ee 21 Gefiead to declare that the Ministry 
did ayy Se sorted os confidence of the House; but immediatel 
het irires that confidence w 
0 Prince’ Alb 
ion of 1840 was the first year of Lord Stanley’s 's 
ile source of moredefeats to them. But delay thr sri 
part 
ae ews able to ete 
Other es had bee 
ieaceneeete fie aie Whigs 
W: ey’s. designation 
r. LusaINGToN, though he wishe d to be understood as 
et all he had said in the debate on the rnc Duties, yet 
declared eee apaves to spent the ee 
sion, in h Mr. Byng, 
Whigs. He ‘denied . ‘tiie applicability 0 of ey ‘oF thet ase 
which had been cited against Ministers, and relied on that of Mr. 
if oe ret gy embers disapproving a pi 
rere of this Ministry were boun assist in brin; inging 
hose eee alts they whally ¢ disapproved. If 
CHRONICLE. 
[N° 93, 
an answer to this last question, for that might be painful to some 
of Sir Robert's pron —At the conclusion of this speech the de. 
bate was again adjo 
allowed Lord W 
walls. The ho 
any impo 
oe wr by the absence = the Tory 
bas d of those sbjere » 
The present adm: wi 
with pata ee without pre party conside 
rious _bribery had pre aed 
ws, al ti 
of the party ; 
Thursday.—Mr. Lz maar correcte: had 
ately fallen, in stating that the Marchal of the ings ‘Bench 
disclaimed all 
question before 
, and on what pence, the country 
overned t eo say he cesar. had 
n his o| we ag as 
rtant fares anit 
rat 
welfare of the people. He denied that the’several elections that 
ea it 
th 
be not shot ro ates rie the ones) Sissnaye: Upon that same 
if he cam 
arty Sir R. — would now 
teration in the Corn Laws gav Sobeony tothe managementof tretand —to 0 thei nterrupted relations | things, » JACKSON accused Mr. O’ConNELL of cruelty as a 
which Earl Stanhope, the Earl of Radnor, Earl Fitz ofour friendship with ce stion of general education | landlord ; adding that he hada leman ready to prove on oath, 
took Lord BEAUMONT said that he feit it Lis auty to sup- | —tothecircumstances of in in our colonies. He depre- | at the bar, that the hon. member for Dublin levied distresses 
the present Corn-laws, and to resist the attempts projected cated strong langui in ion, and regarded the present | o: oy ip April for rent due in March, &c. He (Sergeant 
government for alteration. It with much regret that | crisis as ly req ig calmness of consideration. He ad- | Jackson) was aware of the efforts — to eject from his 
he, having for sa short a! enj the honour ofa seatin their | verted to the existing distresses of the ora rea g districts, | seat 2 : Eaielbaiy Dat 1 he defied the agents of Government; they 
Lordships’ house, sna himself peedet Pp} * this | and observed that no plan but that of Ministers had been sug- | would not succeed. 
subject, @ go’ whose general policy he concurred. | gested for its relief. This would probably be wie last address to Mr. O’ConnELL denied the apo — brought against him. 
But he opposed this eae th to reduce the ond tas —— corn, be- | the House late Admiralty Bill es Dh eet the Admiralty | He let his land, he said, at lower re! any of his neighbours, 
cause he knew that it would msidered the | Judge from a seat in the House of Co: ms); but he should | and had never turned out oredr eating for misconduct. He 
ee a total repeal of it. sa abncoed te doles his ion, | quit that psiatherrs adhering to ‘to his party by pence and parte had never heard of a distress levied inthe manner descri and 
to all the best interests of try, | among many political opponents. not one, he who if such a t had taken place, he must ewan heard of it. If, ) 
8 f several peti petitions, infavourof vanban:” aE them presented, penonal enemy, however, his agent had done an: of the kind, ‘he would not 
and the bills on the anced a stage, when their Sir W. Foiterr asked if Ministers h er swerved from the | again employ him. Sir D. Rocus bore testimony to the humane 
ps 5 ee Grey, how came it pc rcahee and i character of Mr. O’CoNNELL as alandiord. Mr. 
= HOUSE OF COMMONS. to ‘e that Lord Grey con: the it - | SLawey hoped, before the debate closed, that Sir R. Pee. would 
BRefore the adjourned debate On; SIE R. vernment? The present motion, he said, was not brought for- | make e statement of the measures he meant to bi forward 
« gett wah telah conivcveatieak eifine Rnkarare ward to deny the right of an wer wittout to the country, but to cen- | for the benefit of the humbler classes of the community. 
© Luscombe. thie jerit una the: Sierk retention ut a dissolution ; for the The Earl of Dartrvcron maintained that few statesmen 
ates fox the county of ‘he © Ghd. refused ts sak it to’ be dissolved till theréhad a | eminence ld le to show that they had guilty of no 
pe <i aby Giertdebe ie aca eceatonit int areturn | debate on the Cama in the hope that during that del inconsistency in the course of a long political career. Little im- 
rp y pete t ie ripaiss ly trifrcegen the clerk | something might occur to excite the passions of the people in th portance was, therefore, he thought, to be attached to thecharges 
ed Mastay eae: ee ee ee ‘hcoming elections. He believed the ni — find | made so pointedly against Lord Srantey and Sir J. GRAwAM; but 
pao Pit potind jeecinied the atioarped ‘a ey themselves mistaken in their hopes of reviving the s| of 1831. | if hon. gentiemen opposite were on the look-out for inconsistency, 
thotion nf'Si’ R Peet, and eoptrs Journ Passing to theterms of Sir R. Peel’sresolution, Sir W. Polle main- | why did they overlook ioe PALMERSTON, or why did they not 
‘Mages the wan contended that since the change intro- tained that since May 1839, the rs had never poss single out Lord J. RusseL., who in 1821 wrote so aera 
Jay mice ening ane ry newesay, Order | the conadenee of the Hote of Sco ores | eee e agileltual interest against the com 
nist upporte to enable th: t any their legislative measures itis ‘ore: 
By mee <u It was fully warrantable inthe Whigs to have | without the conc ce of their 0; ; and it was con- eS >a defended the consistency of Lor d MELBOURNE On 
mc nt forward measures in v which t they calculated alte airgid tinuance in power under such ci ees, that ont! the subject of the prietag tee, That noble lord, he said, ma 
bondi ae ca eee: hme: Se sects = = coun ya the could no | to the spirit of the constitution. The principles of fi le refused his consent to an agitation in favo of an alteration 
po phe e : y : =< ex! cori ofa Peel, he the ification of the Corn-laws were not brought forward, he | the law, until he e convinced that nefit to the people 
decd aticn etre aj Py them. ‘or having brought | co , with any expectation thi ld a law, } of such achange would outweigh the evils of squalici The hon. 
pcteers sear Si caivion ie: tohave compelled even his | but ly for the purpose of e! member spoke at great length against the resolution before the 
anleuain Ges as Sir J aires for a commenting on | Sir R. Peel, in 1835, had the support of the Crown, of the House | House, and maintained it was necessary, before an ae 
ok Che: tech des tierce: te vase 3 Spee asserted the right | of Lords, and y of the representatives of one portion | was made to the country, that there should be a full discussion 
Shaute nae te peaks in os Lames ai Segcreed rpc they | of the empire ; yet ure of an imp as isiative | all the measures proposed by Government. Mr. C. Bruce mad 
tion, that diinisters cae it rank = to ines pega he resigned office. The contrary course now pursued | that a Government could only be judged by the effects it produced ; 
Sane ioe S sted 9 ie ah! en they no longer pos- | was at variance with the spirit of the constitu' antag and that | and if the distress of the lal g asses - as great as 
baerscbegitei gercominnr Aicbing ta pores rams are song ea ci ferns course, he felt convinced, could not be longer continued es heen stated by Mr, Suangy and Sir C. Grey, it followed that the i 
— tn His. avery Siig _-uboat to ise tty heoteepertug tie power Lge Lira garetts of the Crown, and the § Government must be a bad one, such astate we tings — sro ; 
¥6 rou i ie hon. | 
thatthe aso akg: sings be Femomsane chiedy on the ground | Sir C.Gre¥ contended that, whereas Sir R. Peel had asserted ‘on: ma er S eoacae conan believed, was as sincere \ 
nt were passed, that Ministers would not mae oor porta | absolute obligation of ministers to resign, Sir W. Follett had quali- ig now he sat at the other side of the House, which 
prongs iri: se > ‘tae party =r lisse: —— fa rag jose cation. se yen wr in see Sew their pi = emnnerewin te og he quitted only when he found he could no longer Bayi 
2 + ‘3 meetings ol fri er . . The 
they would not seniee WOieerate s peseestinrhcaye gag psa ra — vad, where Chartists cam of Conservatives, bat | dificulties imadeberen abe considered, in the meadiing inte=- 
—Mr. J. Gratran also placed co id moe ea pn erty tax. | not the objection to a regular am ified discussion of the | ference of Governmentin the concerns of fo meson whence 
Sch ek chee Dee ard rae ce her Majesty’s Minis- | Corm-laws in the House of Commons, unless on the ground a a Pe Sees but expensive wars had arisen. The hon. 
Sadar amet ; ma, tot ole of their fo- | such a discussion might be inconvenient to gentlemen opposite. Fania re particularly blamed the want of pene shawn 
SOBD POUCY: : ee Oe he thought their | The question being merely whether the dissolution should by M the case of _ and afterwards passed & 
whole conduct entitled them to the co and thanks of t! place re or after a discussion on the Corn-laws, he " aie abecaataee to the Scotch 
panto ae did aa ene Frm confidence, however, on their | that the public in general wi pect that a discussion of the axchic ay _ Sauaeieie ead ihe stion now before the 
_— ree: - Le cee , ra a esa those proposals dangerous | Com-law should precede a dissolutio: hed for some com- Pont important as it might be to the other portions of the em- 
oi | bak are Ps Te su eee rm : xed duty on corn, the whole | parison between the claimsof the = — ‘O power—he wish pire, was a question of life and death to Ireland. If the accession i 
ie — = ‘ m. mus sore sai ‘ e transferred tothe Continent. | to now what measures the m had introduced to show | of Sir R. Pegs to pow ‘0 be panied by the passing of 
estar _ kia had er on Lord Stanley, hers 'y the impe- | their new love of liberal principles, por the Irish Registration | Lord Sranuey’s Registration Bi believed that a regular } 
tat ~ bad drive a m Mi we art aopran tae So: his sctiewe af Trish regis- | Bill. The House, he said, might vote a transfer of er from | government be impracticable in Ireland. On the subject } 
gts po heen ceasing pistes this Gove: to another ; but let them beware how they thus | of the Corn-laws, he had always voted with Mr. ViireRs, aud { 
f 7 . Hi fe “Ee f ‘ € gr ents and €sS | forfeited the confiden hich the representative body oaght to | he still believed that ahigh price of corn was not necessarily ' 
& or - mers on in his foreign policy; on points of | enjoy from its constitu —Mr. Hanbury complained that a de- | ficial to the Irish landholder. Mr. Ham insisted upon it ; 
* : 
partic! 
Roar dita he m eral strictures. He denie 
ee te preceden sng Noor 
Peckian a 
said, we 
nisters, he 
ep 
ery por tit pear pe w hich epposed Mr. Pitt and 
ere Vi 
Sit R. Peel ; trea in sear majorities had been gradually growing | 
~ —constanth 
—for a number of years. The pres 
icio 
se 
= i mae nega 
e felt sat tisfied th the i 
cael reposed. The hon. baronet eulogised the 
ares of Government, and on those measures, event’ 
esent t 
unfairly inferred by Sir J. Graham mere careless expres- | the uring s, but to kee; mselyes in their 
sion of his, that if it b 331 his vote, the Ministers | Cheap bread, he , must lead to io - 
should never have an o ity of ging on the question of Mr. Munrz d that the only question ol 
the Cor-laws. If his constituents should reject him, he should | whether the present Gavernment enjoyed t ce 
| at least have the satisfaction to feel that he was discarded for | House, t was not only question. question WaS+ 
ving been true to his principles, while Sir J. Grah: been | whether the gentle opposite enjoyed that confidence. He, for 
isters 
, e point, 
Pposil against them all pat oo 
>» on this Corn-law anita what c g~ 
in an op 
And now, dens 
he, of the “* heavy agriculturists ” = taneeie pot 
Si rt bert sai 
Sp i] 
Iyerad ep 
ut Be 
t 
Sir Robert Peel? Sir Ro had + Rasence explicit excess 0 drive them from their places ae 
e adhered to the principle of a sliding scale: b a that might debate tice then again adjot eae 
thing. Did Sir R. Peel intend toagmtinne to. thefares. | “gree pyhold and a third time 
England the aa they at present oe ed? Tiat dd. pas: _ Russell 
simple question at least might ine answered. Sir Robert seas x geag Friday.—Lord PaLmeRsTon, in the absence of Lord oe 
ions open. ballot am id suffrage, but he had n aie said — his noble friend would fix a day for the wea J jnittee 
aneteeee on the Charter ; perhaps that would the whole House on the Corn-laws before the House separated. 
of treaty of Nottin; sham. ‘of himself, he was not pre- © aceneanene ly be on Tuesday next. 
pared to take the bait held out i in Sir R- Peel’s political rat- Bre Mr. Suisn resumed theadjourned debate. He began by cal 
bate aelage can sarge with Ireland? And is ‘ould | ing attention to the fact that the resolution before the T0ly 
Read hare thought of him if he had ‘left condemnation of the measures eas 
cn sacha canon” OI ts i atta therefore, preciude the adoption of these same 
