THE GARDENERS 
is offe some bruised seeds are forced down 
the throat of one, and a at of 
the other, in afew minutes the latter _ be quite well, 
while ll die in about two Granivor- 
ous 3 nr seeds are their chi ccaneied: add 
thereto fruit, insects, &c. Carnivorous birds, whe- 
ther they live 0 on flesh or insects, are uniform in their 
food, and they have no recourse _to seeds. Piscivorous 
, ee 
he: suppasce 
with large gullets r pouches, in in which they accumula 
po * provision. Bin ds of prey endure hunger for a very 
iod, =“ so ist uadrupeds. The agg 
AncHEs’ i ic, aineont Te Office of the Judge promot 
erder V. Speare.—Sir H. Jenner gave his jodgnrent in this 
ease, which h: retchi gen ome al interest in the Church, and 
as ir 
th 
and language, as well ro san th rformance of ivin 
as before and after- to the admissibility of these articles, the 
Court, with a slight alteration in the 11th, admitted th st 
that decision an a) n asserted and tage & 
part of the parish, whose especial duty 
indeed, a 
caahronaens to 
set an example ot sobriety an and of pasta, renee econo 
ae timers gt wom fe man t Piste 
pastor. 
onnected 
formance 
rections of the ni-hop, was bound in ¢ ote either 
im person, or by hooey the office beri nst Mr. 
Tt had d that this prosecution was. founded en- 
tirely on malice oak a will, and Pina the. ne Bishop had been 
~ grossly one ba! ea yed with. It had said, likewise, 
that the suit merely originated in personal sity. Now, it 
was inly ble ¢ s A case pore established by 
evident at the witnesses. might prove a case of conspiracy, 
perjury, a Sul tiop of perjury. Bnt the Coart must neces- 
sarily require th evirtence, most hu-ive proof, 
of such a charge... All bility was certainly. against it. The 
Court could have no if th Speare, 
] 
which had be ed b duet of thei 4 ied 
to any personal motives of. malice or. ill agai i. 
Several of the parishioners beea comuelled to withd 
themselves from the parish church, and, if this gentleman were 
allowed to remain in the parish, that church id be, mm the 
course of time, altogether deserted. It due to these parish- 
joners that this gentleman should for a. tine, at any rate, be re- 
moved from the place, which the Court trasted would be thus 
e improbable, 
conspiracy a ‘rieads wh 
given =—= with aie, 
tenor + pied ree es, and 
they involved. Bat 
CHRONICLE. [N° 23. 
penalties to cultivate number of trees, lopped the vine stalks, and c of the . 
Having eaeet Wena eerie yk defendant Baste amt boughs from the larger fovie.| trees. For the plaintit the fore- 
him for the penalties, and the Mer Chan¢ellor, under going facts were proved: e defendant it was contended 
that the plaintiff was ignorant o e terms of the lease at the | that he had a right to pm 5 > the trees he did, as any » whi 
time he executed it, and that it ers as drawn up by the defendant’s | is an outgoing tenant had a righ fs e value of any trees he 
son in terms more ner es than = originally jcc to, planted, provided they were no rtain number = M farsa 
granted an injun: estrain the defendant from reco growth, or have the privilege of taking them away; and as to 
the penalties. lopping the vines and cutting the boughs of the Apple peter 
‘gimp hae cellor gave judgment, and expressed an ae aT far from injuring them, it pose them, for they required it to 
from tiom-of the .pleadings and evidence, that give them strength and makethem productive. There was much 
plaintt poke paps not claim any protectlon from the equitable hag contradictory evidence Mr. Serjeant Bom having replied, 
pon 
satisfactory evidence was given. without 
flection on the witnesses on Feo bee The jury having sags 
torney employed to draw up the lease, in c with the | sulted for a few minutes, found a verdict for the defendant. 
agreement previously signed by the plaintiff, but if such an ob- ——————— 
jection was to avail, for the purpose f puting the validity of TATTERSALL'S, Tourspay.—The late Derby yy and Oaks.—Im 
a lease, there were few leases in the kingdom that could be main- | the settling for these races on Monday, it wes stated that one: 
taiaed. as nothing more usual than the em plo yment by 2 | jar altogether unsettled. It woul appear t ot 
landlord of his own legal agent to eta uD bert mere of that | the Pi le 21,0007. book, and on b: Rete was 
e tion. His lordship observed on dopted in | of nearly 2,0007., but having been give understand tat by- 
resent case of making the retin =) “to th 1,in | others who were heavy losers he sh minus nearly double: 
order to exclude his testimony, and took occasion to say that, as | that amount, he had some i 
have left the ight adh the ee mprotected, yb if it had been his creditors to nettle for him, and 
necessary, he would measures to have thelegal rights | the stewards of the Jockey ciab, on the appoint 
of the pee “« upon receivin: sums due they were prepared to pay all de- 
Row fentey and others.—Mr. mands in full,” an opinion that ** persons Owing money 
cause again n order for ensiving an injunction restraining Upon this authority application 
proceedin a ga by the defendants in equity, ‘* Henley and | was de yesterday to the losers, several of whom paid the 
wife against Smith.” It appeared that James now aca money, Ass understanding, that ca ae a heresy : e- 
was seised in fe se and premises at Lampton, ment, it s:ould be returned. The discussion of this os and it | 
eston, Middlesex, © advertised to be let, and that the is a novel one, occupied so — metas se was. 
plaintiff, William : pat) (in February 1838) with Warr ~ lone on events to come off. e ha ly to quo’ ~ 
the nt of Ede, to take a lease at 80/.a . An ierciensiokth ing bets :— 
was Si and left in Warren’s hands, the plain sn ss “a dghbs bed? P Bur, . 
was let into possession. He found the sett aa out of repair, jercost ~ Francis 
und Lo agshed to = who, by letter dated so i. Bene resi 5,90) 1, oom (aS ERBY, ints. an be Nossa i 
Ss , &c., and that eeX-| 18 to 1 agst Brother to Phenix, 30 to eae 
bet a the rent. ” smith made chee pares swrg pa oe tenets. bm tan to ee Xv (1 ~, .- 
which were stated to amount to 1 27/.; but Ede refused po vee > rtful Dodger el ese : 
lore Jone, sod and boot e agr t from Warren. were |) 7 The tt eg e Zieneny, taken) 
veral int een Smith and Ede, who, Smith alleged, 23 to i Hester colt 1gto. 1 ‘ol. Peel’s lot (taken) 
K e geet of 1839, to grant the lease and to allow ont 30 to 21 Palladium 
the rent credit for the repairs. and Warren recommended t SOS eT 
127/. should be dforthem. Ede went to Gui  refa: MARK LANE, Pripay, June 4.—The su ipply cf English Wheat: 
to perform his ment, and died there, having devised his | has b on but trifling since Monday, and the sales that have been: 
pr to Agnes, the wife Henley. Mr. and Mrs. Henley ere — jay’s pele a a pees paid by Pie ven 
- .o allow smith credit for the re; to bring | 5,0v0 qrs. o: eat on Wei lay, and itis now 1s. per qr. er 5, 
Supe eee ae ee wo ant Hee Oe erat | tinuce eeaty for, aatdlate 2 Se Baye ost 
occupation, in which they 1771. 10s , the amount of ren r imm e consump ey 
on which smi the bill, praying that the agreement unaltered, but Oats are = dec! in value. 
oe ed with Wegrren ht be carried into effect; that a BRITISH, per Imperial anes m8 
should be executed by Mr. and Mrs. Benlers that he,| Wheat, ag Reena Sak White noc 
(Smithy poles be suomet pte A for as jue reselats an Mr. and er eRrR SEE “Malting eT afaiing init Grek Mie 
= 5 og ley might be restrained fro: eeding in action Oats, T indelashive ‘and Yorkshire Polands 22t025 Feed 
ae eee d Svotch .-. ~ ad — 
Tord Langdale epee e injun continu: ed, Smith ee Ra ee 
paying 17/. into sources prac eine oe pay hashes SeLiotera peek as Bye. - Massgas, chinnduaw. . as tot0 _ Tick a 
it acerued due to Mr. = Mrs. Henley. The order was made - ye peton Hetigoland a mt bog nares 
without prejudice tc any question in the cause eas, White. - + + - + + 32 to ‘aple 
Viex-CHANcELLOR’s Court. — Newlands vy. Paynter. a dese deer ie rs arate 
. Paynter, og 7 y. ats. 
year 189 ices ters teinen, apal ss «| | 2a a i 
her husband, torestrainthe| y, 2 °° | Gs 3| st 7|-s2at 
Seika toot Sates bes Oe ee 8. ee eee | ¥ r >t = “ a 
been to b — ‘21 Ayr rece 80 
father fe ment Segoe ence te marriage. eat ef (6 ee 8) ee 
Cinicelfer dissolved an injunction, restraining the 6 , Aver, @8| at 5| 92 9 
seizing, which had been granted “by the Vice-Chancellor, but. re- ee 4 ean sexe 
strained the sheriff from proceeding to sell the ques- aties .! a2 8] 15 a! 13 9 
tion further orders. Sheriffaccordingly kept possession | _ 
of the property till the late decision$ as to ‘the effect of marriage |. Maxcnzs.—Subjoined are the present p' 2 Rene aan per ar @ 
upon gifts t separate use of while , when, 8 bushels: Halinch ditto, 21s ae qr. ae Piapokues 2 7 te ‘er er ton; Bae bg 
the matter was again seusete before the Lord Chancellor, who | % 4! 108 per ton; Graves, 5! to 51 108 pe F toms Cree ey Pance’s Humus, 14s 
made an order re! to the master to inquire how the pro- ys Bee ws = tom; sae ee ihe! Te even 1es par Ses Poittevin'’s 
- en, acgutred, an eine: the age tae until after the | Paeat D infected Mam , 18s 6d per gr; Nicrate of eee i 0420, sa 6d 
The m: wt. 3 N: otash, Saltpetre, Li 
that oat fol the property nat been given ven 68 ie tbotaas ope: fis per on : ihe Urate of bas the London Manare Co oman, Lane Repress. aaa 
cifically, and other parts of it had-been purchased out of her | *“4*** cyt cone rare ami zctt 
separate estate. Mrs. Newlands now premaned a yes ion pray- Se er on 2s wai 
HE WEEK. 
ing that the (apne Paynter and Holmes, might the She get Mincing-lane; 
whole costs oft the i eas ENEOLMEREE ose, Comscoerslel Se ner of Ds oar smart” 
a ae 
London, and of ee pee Tey, broker——S. 
Bry: 
ada otha Bagi aries be Liverpool—T- 
His Honour he petition ont-heroded Hi in its prayer | mason—L ant, Stentord hill, Middlesex, coal-merchan 3 Se sa 
asto Air re did not think hes was at ep, atjedlonte ‘om | Beeston, Bedfordshire, market- gardene er—E. M. Demuisse and cy Biver— 
more than the costs of the Lord Chancellor's order, and of the on ga igeS erng Ste <rchante—D. HL Son ore 
reference, and of the present petition, which he ordered the BANKRUFTCY ANN NULLED.—J, Watts, Wednesbury, Staffordshire. 
creditor to pay. ent-manufacturer. Mid, Wi od tant 
Shuttl-worth v. Cocker—Mr. K. Brace moved for an injunction | _ BANKRUPTS.—E P. Sardinw, J- Westononé Bo OP ocrma 
to restrain the defendant, who was the owner of a FO | eee eee ee ee cW. Barton, Bordesiey, and C- Burton, Digbeth, Las 
fi , which te within 30 yards of the plaintiff’s man. | /cRIMS fos Teltitad-makers— 8. Williams, Live erpooly and t ne Mace 
m2 pte ae -engine and grinding-machine in such a see Polen pa iron-works, coer if yea |, Barwick- 
e 7 hae 3 fs cate J 
gy Pe ether gb fer ke ae ge gan ge wee lease, Sockshire innkeeper—J. Prescott, Upholiand, Lancashire, iankeePer 
In 1837 the deferidant erected a new engine of much larger di- | ““k’“"rhompson, New -upea-Tyne, butcher — EB. Skillman a ‘ilen= 
m ad been formerly used, which ed so much | Keeler, Hythe, Kent, linen-drapers—h- Bourne, Tea aight at 
noise, and dust and smoke, that Col. 0 rented | ¢ Sa Campi a W. Pera Pata —- qe wenbroner Be 
the mansion, gave it up. The piaintiff, o = foninn of age in Oct. | 3. Knish Gamera Whitby Royston, Manchester, come 
= vos to reside in the mansion Rye pe: are, and, after |: misston-aeent=- Prive and J. Edwards, bankers, Shrewsbury— 
Ag wi andes tanaer, qytbaita, Mackie, taiior, 
New: 
he nuisance, at length ran Seal 
iaght an action st him, and obeataed @ Verdict in Anat castie-upon Tyne—J. ae jrom-master, — 
last, the jury finding tha the smoxe and the dust and the goweee ts re. Le ree ost eaaced ay ad 
noise produced by the machinery were a nuisance. ‘The de DD. Grant pet ‘J 5. Sillars, Glasgow, Sat Izat, M 
j manufacture: 
Reed Dus dee, rer—J. Muir, Edinburgh, victual-deales—> 
> Seal-engraver- 
oviate these nuisances; but the affidavits in 
ion s' ed that the whole neighbourhood was ful: af smoke 
and steel-&ili cd st, and that the machinery produced | BIRTHS.—On the sist at Bockieton, county of WT remen 
what. some witnesses das a groaning, moaning noise, | lady et the Rev. E. H Sladen: ot stone ~! 2th ieee ate lady of the 
and what others termed a deep, grating, melancholy moan, which | #4¥ of G- gas ee OT Fon calogs of a dxwghier—Oe, she 28 Sik 
ec heard distine ly at three miles distance. The defend- | 317. Samuel Carless, of Thomas-street, peso ot a  dacger—On 
ant’s afidavits, however. in great part, contradicted these state- | 29th ult.,at Wandsworth Some ze tails M- Bare eter On tne 30 
ments, and insisted that things had been mach altered and im- Gears psec af penne gahes ai, the lady of J. w. Cuneta cea 
proved since the verdict. hain, the lady of W. Hall, Bea 
Honour said enowgh had been shown, at least as to the of eee an 1” Northarapton-square, mare, the wise of Me 
him to 
On the 3ist ult, at.N 
mostunjast imputations “ 
still it was difficult to lay any rule on | 20ise, to induce the injunction. as. Duff Filer, of a son- sits: eaghicianiebinn 
ould be f oo Id only} Svrtines ar Nist Paics.— Wardall v. Usher. MARRIED. "Os the thw #8 Sf Keshingson, Surrey, © 
aet dy etion of counsel. e Court hack action brought to recover compensation for the destruc- | daughter of Johai Cowell, Esq., of the former efi te 
circumstances whi op would have justi- | tion of some vine-stalks, and Apple and other trees, under the tlt. at St. George's papel, Stone! » De sy eaueh see Bet the tase tae Baca 
ee less severe than had been decreed it < Hager coerertiaeens 3:—Mr. Serjeait Bompas and Mr. Hog- Amwei Seg Cae goin oe tie Grant, caly 8 Se Nichol = Church: , 
Sel eone thew had been no appear- | gins were for che plaintif Mr Serjeant Shee and ir. Peacoc i rig ete mypemmcenlg tet oe es sins Mansell; Jet ao hae 
Tai note gelthccarad e delay that for the defence. It leat laintiff was sn a sak: aul 
heen caused by the conduct of the widow, and a lady of property, residing im (arcy-street, Lincoln’ sa DIED. 25th ult., F cottage, oe ge ter, Mrs vde Parke ter 
RETA ithe s and 15. years” since the erpteey father, a Mr. Lea — of The Tate Daciel Fitch, of Earns eee Demet. ae | ie Mtv ADDS 
e mor the defendant ‘who Tate, om the 27th wit-, the Hee. See? captain: in: the Royal Navy, and wie 
f of = house and = tanyard. | inceecommy sé Dorset: he wae SS AES Back of Poceslinnio “ihe ies 
ne ct rhe] 
mverted it into a garden, in which | “ard te fie sccales by bie taly som, Henry Dusewon: tasers & 
stion, as also the vine. Previous | of this most-excelledt and and ache re ie Rooarhood, — Soe 
orate prey ccmnso | far ea Teak hy ea pe eee 
axious to dispose of it, sent a surveyor 
imed a of 175. for by Mi Basnsces and a, eae etree as 
refused, 2 pro- omnes Griitefriars, im the a ore 
e cwed ie the: | the Brecines of in ear a 
the Overes, 3. CH LF cemdonagnat fy tant 
all 
‘Sate 
Communications aie i 
that no purchaser peal A ar en sah: ‘ oe 3 
