THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE. 
[N° 26. 
farthings and nearly half a farthing, or more accurately, 
four-pence and eighty-six a of a penny, in the 
4 lb. toaf, and in the ratio of o e hi undred | and fou r and 
or considerably more than Jouble the om: ‘and that 
there ¢ can be obtained 8 lbs. and ae rua a ae, 
punishment by bpm ea or otherwise, and m: ly in 
this case, which was at the nae of an ee aoa Ma 
yao of the aid of am advocate, a was un- 
instituted. chee igeges ccording to the description of 
23d section, this proceeding 
The ber yee. ned 
visitation was said not to be ecclesiastical court, bi 
ander the 25th anette, cos ge req pe that there should be no 
po then, raised 
Adv 
peter a in which electro-magnetic power is 5 ‘meg bey 
printing ; so that a person may be enabled t a 
typogra > ical process at a dis eae m 
the place orl it is actually perfi 
Antiquities, — — A London nde paper states, that on 
s close to 
Culmore fort, a ca: nnon-ba mg =i iron ya gr 12lbs. Itis 
thought probable that it had been fired from one of the 
fri ve ees ch cannonaded the ae ge nm garri iabied b y 
‘oops, before they broke the boom, and had struck 
a i 
visitor on 
pe 
wering 
was of the pers, shew 
On ti eee one side i 
intended to aoply toav isitorial power, but the court had 
not look to reports to construe aig 
They must speak for themselves. 
prem oe 
Bo 
— id. 
form us, that eleton nearly complete, was dug up be- | former laws, which did not give the archbishop the power now 
tween Side-cairn an , in the parish of Avondale, | Claimed. - “ape net ing with te ee orn = “om 
mum > suc mnqusilio, ac v lenunciaho, W 
by Mr. Jamieson, Middlecroft, a few days ago about tw | persons had come to answer the sentence passed by the ordinary 
feet fro m t he surface »_ deposited in a moss , the | in his court; and in this stage of the t it asked, 
1 excepting the fore part of the — ot answered, why, if the ordinary posses _— - had 
uch great expense been resorted to in order to bring spiritual 
skull, which had moul ere away by being Oe The persons to becom tery It was well known that the want of the 
singular appearance of the vesture, and his h are | Bo power now claimed formed one of the reasons for introducing 
hair and a long bea nyse the present law. The court was aware that the jurisdiction of a 
must have lived. and died i itor had been described in comprehensive terms by ed 
16th or 17th century 3 nine and the ae. that Lord Holt had given in the 
been quoted, had reference t uestion arisi 
Madame La afferge —The Gazette of Limoges gives cat rir a "Sharitable foundatin. There it was held that he eiaitce 
her epi f the late M. Laffarge, of a iat he like sod with his plete “1 _—o. — com- 
NY i upon sevi cases cited in the course e argu- 
bemsypra M. Coinclun Fagin the father of his first Sata; aad. in CORELiON, olieerved. that ascamct GAIA Sai 
7 apply the rule applicable to the proce ames be = gyn ace 
of 2,500f., but, aft 1 court to acts done in that which was n That court, 
into engagement to advance her, for ce “haan, however, by the I tng! statute, was divested of al aciaine. It 
25,000f. at the end of twelve months, and a like sum ‘was not within the savin Eris which left untouched the ordi 
mary’s power over his Be ergy, it might be exercised in law 
the end of twenty-four mon’ ek th ction of a @ | without p : exatnination ae fal te gato: 
smelting house. The first Laff a anda ts, the co Sed. co 
only aft eo marri: aving b her left the | to conclude that the most reverend prelate, in so as he had 
stole of a cthie xe viage ha ee d a. ed rag M roceeded at the visitation to deprive the dean of his office, had 
ook property to . - | acted beyond his jurisdiction. Thi ‘ore declined to enter 
the 50,000f. u 3 Coinclun e 1 us points as to the p: ings of the ‘tommis- 
Beaufort, a refused to pay the 
was merely a pro! bea to his dang’ 
which she was to Pay eo by relinquishing her annui 
M. ht an acti 
your. Against this = Coinclun bce 
pd tothe Cour Royale, ~ > case cam aie 
wt = 
ith ron Sin ts that some 
- the first Mudene Laffarge, about which sinister 
seeents had been in circulation. The vel tan coe a 
¢ +h 
Cal Soment grec ast decree an are will, 
it is said, be laid before the ¢ Gare of Cassation. - 
ee 
a 
Tax Covert oF QuEEn’s eeoeilt —(Sittings in Banco).—The 
Queen ¥. the Archbishop of York and his Commissary Dr, Philli- 
— ae ste an delivered judgment in this case, e, which was 
pplicati 
Iinition, Drobitne the 
effect the pro int of deprivation from 
San, wo rey th S Sees accruing th . 
the —_ for contumacy and alleged simony. His lordship, after 
briefly stating the facts, which will be fresh in the minds of our 
say —There seemed no reason to doubt awe 
Op 
ry the Rev. Mr. Dixon, one of the 
ered a 
= The was then 
2. He accel pom hey aa the commissary 
im, 4s saps first ince, to purge himself of the contempt ; 
said that Mr. Dixon a go on 
iB. oceeding s 
nal proceeding, 
the knowledge of of the ordimary? The answer q 
this That as. oh a visitor proceeded to examine the proof 
ce charged on a clerk, for the purpose af 
e same amoun ner 
ectro~Magnetic Printing = » Machi ine.—The Inventors’ pes hi dare trom t . 
vocate states, that a very ingenious machine has been scarcely tg polar e ge 
ovi 
Hf aT oT 
Tha 
ment required to be narrowly wed mercy because if gy eine 
the fullest extent it might be used to give effect ti 
cause they were brought to a pa But) 
proceedin; 
court 
that is not aon case here, for on looking at the sentencethe 
Fe agp that the archbishop admonished the dean not te-ex 
his office on of excommani 
Ss 
conviction of t 
i Soleo sof the learned commissary, be 
that learned civilian had not reverted to the statute. The court 
ention, decupied 
unassisted 
bot — ic, and in a parti 
0 doubt, where they felt none, on subjects of such para- 
importance, ce, and a oond affecting its dpe its interests, 
rohibition therefore, 
'Y- 
rdyoee en V. Moxon.—This was 
e@ passages 
m the volume lately edited by M 
ww of thi .—Mr. Serjeant Berean on the 
Pedy stated that he was as incapable as any man in 
ety of committing theoffence charged against him in-the pre- 
con- 
y 
fore, w the it Occasion was, 
the dis yr om ed thei imputations cast upon it by the indictment, 
and w vhether the publisher had sent it forth barr ofeaaaca 4 to the 
world k bout motives of 
a 
consequences of the pomieciatint its 
ee here read the passages, and observed that he Loe 
ra no doubt a they were prrtarmen to cast reproach 
what were im C. he causes one ob- 
it © was not, how ae sufficient that mere 
an offensive character should exist in a work in 
pul itan criminality. 
vindication of the obnoxious passages, if the pretended contra. 
diction were only us waatae ae cloak for disseminating the mischiey_ 
ous libel which it professed to It 0! 
jury 
the beeh Said. 
uestion was the mposition of a. 
youth a 18, and that it i in eer, Ghacke contradicted itself. This, 
was certainly true: but it could not prevent the poem from being 
very mischievous. also observed, that the later grees 
y 
writing an account of the life of another, was at liberty to state 
fact of his having at an e period of hi: e entertained 
such opinions as those now objec to. He did not even think 
that there was anything illegal in expressing the opinions them- 
ves in the langu the m to whi h ° 
buted. Such opinions as those expressed bes t ee had cer- 
piss fe been bene epwoy entertained in y persons of 
How far it was 
sidered by the persons who had in 1 th nd the 
pow! ute such proceedings. or himse! as of 
opinion that the best and most effectual method of re- 
gard to such obnoxio es, was to refute them by by ar- 
gument and reasoning. For, however venera! sacred may 
be the objects which ape assailed in such publications, he 
thought that they would be more effectually suppressed by 
futing the sentiments amano, ¢ than by p cuting their au- 
It was, however, the duty of a jury, whe: @ case 
erdict of ‘ 
TATTERSALL’S, Tuurspay.—There were not 30 subscribers 
present, and the betting, although it touched be sel tit ve the 
thors. 
was *broveht ane them, be decide it according to 
law. The jury returned a Guilty.” 
events now in the market, was a ——— 
extent to require an a ollowing ez pon the 
“averages ”’ at the clos: 
° sULY STAKES. 
1 agst Rosalie c (taken) | Offers to take 5 to 1 bar two. 
GOODWOOD shan ye 
12 to 1 agst Bellona (taken) Ratsbane ) 
14 tol Welfare (taken) The Jovial Bachelor 
15 tol Portrait (taken) (taken) 
16 tol Fitzroy t St. Francis, P- 
2 tol Cambyses (tak (taken). 
25 to 1 (taken) to back the field agst 12. 
Offe: 
csoopwooD CUP. 
est Colwick (taken) | Stol 
= fot “al Lae 1 ee arles 
agst Pocahonta: 
Pi eeve 
=i Duvernay colt (taken). 
ae Late D ‘Der aaa settlement of the sere ve vor has 
the public, tenes 
MARK LANE, Fripay, x 1¢ market is ingly 
bare of En Ne Wheat ed sate te isan inerened demu. oly 
exceeded. Free Foreign is cened in value, ae there is 
some inquiry for bon but th doing in that article— 
Barley continues in d the same rates, and Peas 
a dull sale.—The Oat trade is firm at Monday’: S 
BRITISH, per Imperial Quarter. rs 2h 
Essex, Kentjand Suffolk... . . White 56t065 Red 56to 6? 
ee a and Yorkshire . . . 581064 White 60to 
Bark Ce coats weer a Malting and distilling 291034 Grind. 2 to3e 
jimeolnshire and Yorkshire + © Polands 22t025 F 20-40 24 
A Norchamberiand and Scotch”... Feed 241025 Potato S8t0 2% 
Pr ee ee P, 2290 BS 
Tick 
arley. 
30 
30 9 
29 7 
30 2 
— w We 30 10 383 
se a enon oe 2 1| 30 6 35 1 | 3a 2 a 
Duties * sii] 13 9! 16 9] 12 6} 2 
K. 
aes LVENTS.—. 3 
ri accvah thes “SUPERS: DED.—T. S- Day, merchan' t, Norwich—W- 
Manchester. 
E WEE 
Agree upbotmerer, ose 
oat ‘Lincolnshire rocer— 
x3. Blanch, Bat 
L. Jones, : 
ve house-street, 
Touel Cueto corn-miller, Knaresborow 
jomersetshire, a J. Stower, Grenville 
. orth, cheese and bacon-factoly 
M. H. facturi many ree Old 
road, betty Side! am and T ye Haugh 
“Scorch 3: SE eee ee ONS. Ee MéIntos 
M. Blair, it se g, victualler—J. Clnnes, pooeelirg Ol Sh ee 
Dickson, sen., cag eu sometime a partner of the Dum' 
Company—J. Bruce and A. M. Bruce, Edinburgh, organ 
Edinburgh, grocer—T. Vallance, Edinburgh, bak: 
————— 
BIRTHS.—On Fri 18th, ton Rectory, near Brigh 2 
ig Tae Soe Sem Saar Linear, 
2 am- No a 2 
ee ee eee lady of Liewseaant W. F 
the 
—On 
SW Winch, tag of a danghoe ~e 
. jaughter- 
Hewlett, of a danghter—On the 28d inst., at Norfolk-stieet, Par = Mn mf 
Parnell, of a daughter—At Surbiton-lodge, Kingston-on-Thames, “ect ‘ae 
inst., Mrs. Manderson, of a daughter—On th st.» in B ny be Wilton 
‘ountess of P , of a daughter—On Wi the 23d ins 
crescent, Vi: tess Chel ‘of a som. R. Moline 
x, of 
sex 
a 
George’! joomsb: ee 
9 fi Edens 
Miss Marianne Stev — E Davy ‘Beq-> 
th 
Harefield- —e a 
Native I of oe eal, Indian Nayy—¢ 
Church; badge Cheshire, 
N. Romney, to J 
‘n 1916he was 4) 
in Foreign Parts to 
Sy Messrs. BRavsuat -atreet, yee 
the Prcine? of Whit ‘Whitefriars, in the € iy ne Ciey of — a Published Shan 
Ov CARLES-STREST, ARDSN, 
ee wubbe at Savertisements and ‘Commonieations a 
Eiitor.-Sesarday, June 25, 1841. 
