THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE. 
at, 9g. 
e from meat, given daily, — 
spoonfuls of soup mad 
This was the state of the ques 
the 
nfuls 
enough to recover ease: 
tion ten years ago, when 
lhe MT 
7 
Me agendie, 
m dogs. "tb e weber a of “typ report containing 
the jeer of these experiments was then adjourned to a 
future meeting. 
Ly. 
Court or CHancery.— City Improvements. Jud; ni 
versity of ekg» ¥. = Lord air end Burgess. pare he es of 
London.— an appeal from a decision of nn Hew 
cellor. too aoe was made before his Honour, “ted I 
our last Number, on behalf of the University of “Oxford, for a 
special injun ction to restrain the = agar the City of Lon- 
don from taking down certain houses Lad-lane, under 
the provisions ¢ ae an Act uo od Padineent peaed ‘in the 2nd and 3rd 
of emer sa bind ceaee J the Gate to London-bridge. The 
hou rleased to it a considerable rental. 
Fonr yeats of te boi ipiesinos 
ho had v aon: compulsory po 
ket ry the fuprovement. of: that sat me | the city, y, had Toetermined 
ening Lad-tane and throwing into the street several feet 
bh the site on which the two houses 4 Poppet rac Th bo 
tended to take a slice be; ‘ing with a foo! 
and a half, an 
The Tnir ersity of se 
insisted that the Cor- 
he Act to take so 
peg ap seventeen feet in thickness. 
are the owners of these houses, in 
on. Ort London had only der 
the pro as should 
the improvement, and not to retain M3 
Chancellor expressed his opiate 07 the City of London was a 
waar obo 7 authority. e Act of Parliament cha intended to 
confer a which would 
the ie new street. 
e di 
with costs. The Lord agente after going bp the dif- 
hich related to the said that 
power was given to ramet 8 0} ico iden Sie 
street by taking down houses and buildin; that 
the intention to permit parts of houses to be taken down, the Act 
would hav d “so much” of any houses and buildings. It 
, that other ions allu to the removing of 
portions dings; bat the only the Act which did so 
of buil of 
was woe ms section, that banal eye for the taking of a portion of 
where both 
eve was 
the 
‘conte, nit his Hono 
The Evesham Union ¥. Sinith.—This was an appeal from the 
Master of the Rolls. - The bill had been filed to compel the de- 
compli ee a 
w were e guardians : be Master 
of the Rolls decreed pg etn gg the 
costs of the ings. The Lord Chancellor commenced b 
observing, that he had of opinion when the case was heard, 
the ap was brought purely for costs, and he had, there- 
fore, looked into the it question, and parti- 
eularly into that a 7 Ime and Craig, which 
been one of those in which “nib ory 
relaxed no appeals brought merely f 
Now, on ooking that case pete pean om el e Shed 
not relaxed the vege and m3 ce at h sgh og 
sage wi or rang re oe 
time that 
because the ery pect 
the poo were bigeye ne aye tof the relict g jaan by 
the bill. In the case of Taylor rv. ras tage which was also 
referred to, the circumstances of th , and a 
question im the appeal which ch folly justified it Deine 
presented to the notice of the . In the present 
was from that part of Headomes whi ordered the de- 
nas et ee ee gees mye hea 
nr nineties “ oikercle = 
were no en an eiception 
to the rie, and his. therefore, felt himself bound 
miss the appeal with costs. 
Browne v. Thorpe.—The bill sought a transfer 
to him of 50 shares in the and Central of Man- 
chester, or a repayment of the he paid. for thi a Mr. 
Stratton.. The shares were purc in April 1836, acum Ld 
so6/.. but they were not immediately transferred into the 
the plaintiff, because the stipulations in of 
rendered it op oye As As the 
bank should be obt: 
met for Lae? purpose pring Strat tton nm iecame taal pt, and the 
vanced to Stratton the money with which he Fa 2007 ood 
ee and that the As eee with him in making a sale to 
and that b themselves of the 
eat thomas aes 
pone ig re’ ing 3 for any debt due by Strutton.— 
Ww and M ix e ak, maintained that the ma- 
nagers did ein advance the money to Stratton, and that there 
oe aed, 
notice of the pice my in the 4 deed which ee ecluded 
nagers of the bank from allowing the transfer without the formal 
consent of the directors ; for he had asked the question at the 
Reon beg renee mal and nkruptey 
lose his money.— 
ys willing 
ay er Teplied the Cond ‘Chae, 
awrt depositions before he 
¥ith-Cuancensen’s Count.—Siutely v, Wells —Mr. K. B 
moved that the defendants, Wells, gees and Harrison, 
pay inte courta very large sum wantingto several 
thousand pounds trust’ mone “a which they had 
wreach of wee | ‘ne tt sag oe 
his will, apyointed three 
ag .an Boi ie ee am 
a 
sauce 
ror etkgoaned ‘scx 
oe bagek and * Aentscgae 
idenpuahilie for the comeraeucliaias 
made that he should transfer the trust funds into courts 
Beard v. Claudet.—M 
og oe and negra 
type apparatus, 
licence to the Aline aera Claudet, for the use of three 
lice appear 
the "letter ty rm Fong prepared in draft, ccDvees pers that the 
patentees should have the option of a Sc ee that it had 
been afterwards altered into the present for! e plaintiff 
contended that the clause, which 
pe parties, im ior 
as on the patentees to 
eieinat was inserted tole ly ye his own protecti 
vedere Sind he need, to retain the licence, not withsta y 
. K. Bro ind Mr. Tor: apenas for 
Hh 
not expréss it.. It was a proper 
— Wi iltett v. Jones & —- eae: a a caus 
suntan interest to executors. It m calling upor 
the core ndant, David Jones, the executor rae Teabella Alderson, to 
pay into court 181i. Is. 1ld., balance admitted by his answer of the 
ba onal estate of the testatrix, and pone the further sum o! 
tated to be paid by him to John Wilson on acc 
Is abe! se pita of Kendal, spinster, by -her will = the 
April, 1 
Alderson, nepal Alderson, Harriet Al 
Alderson, th and daughters of Geor; 
share — and’ appointed the defendan: 
Jones her executor. Upon her death the me fendant proved her 
will. Mi — sortie G — Willett, and Harriet Alde: 
son ue wits nice by the tee, s filed 
» the ees ore tee George anaes the son; and 
avei 
—— there ties of 
daughters fer Srey et &e.; a rayed for a declara- 
tion that the four parties were the persons intended by the tes- 
tatrix, and also for an account. The defendant Jone’ admitted 
‘balance of 181/,.1s. lid.; and the contested point was»the 
pa: ment into court of the 150/. Mr. Kindersley said the bi'l* was 
filed by residuary legatees, alleging that the debts 2 and legacies 
were all paid: The executor, Oo was a Dissenting minister 
with limited means, was ready to pay the 181/., but stated that 
he had put the 150/. into the hands of his solicitor. Lord Lang- 
dale. widuhinete the executor to retain so much money for costs, ." 
not bein: med any costs ened paid, bat a the 150i, 
e han — itor? as that al- 
range begins Sar cepa cera 
m the war itor might yery properly ex: 
have Frc in hand ; and it was more proper for the Seioaatk 
pe ieee cs pcg mae abe y retain it himself: he 
much t 0 be retained 
pam gy ing oe Bury St St. pce designat 
in the will coubil i not be found: ought fit by the 
uary lega’ 
ap pkodeess 
it 
po 
all pon exeeutors for p: 
Wi we ii ew! 
or le ies remamed to be satisfied. He not a 
being any such rule. Where executors must ultimately be eq_ 
titled to costs, there being no question about the matter, it was 
que : 
reasonable hig be should retain some as em ; but the 
circam- 
question here whetlier the i rene was, under the 
stances, at ail enti itled to any €os nd that could only be settled, 
hearing of the The s claimed un \ 
will; the defendant said they had made out their title; the 
nds that eee a Basie he pe ae 
costs. =_ 
fe Lak pico: ea deters hai 
ug ke onevig 
ba bee oa if aaa 
if an — of 2 had : here ae incurred im 
fated. ane answer, an id bad oe safer: med by the. fault or 
want of courtesy of the bisintifs, 2 was pe vadsy but he uae 
not judge of that ndw. The money, when paid into Coart, 
if, under the circum- 
to any. 
— The Metropolitan Wood Pavement 
ther v. Geary.— This was an tion 
erchants, against the’ defend 
Y: 
comp! 
giv ¢ the number 7000, and a seceey pte by Mr. 
Geary ‘hat o should be sent to wince rds, trarismitted 
hi ere es ne rs een = tin M Date yak 
ery of tl 
had been taken away to Sir Francis Hea’ as. ae defendant nt 
wishing to eive the remainder, and the bl ‘nO tile 
it for the purpose for which they were cut, the Pp were 
compelled to bring the present action, as they had to pay Darge 
not only for the cutting of them, but rent for the space they had 
taken up in his yard, which amoun' 4l. Mr. Darge having 
stated that the timber was -no' en re wpe 304. Seca 
it was _ cut, for firewood, 
said there could not bea eee ay Ws oladtists had pete 
Bnatiocsbie injury by the aged ap of the contract, ant 
was or! the jury to assess the amount of dam pone ee with 
elivery of the 7000 blocks that had ivered.. 
i 3 i plaintiff oe the 7000 blocks 
selvere. together with the sty ot to Sir F. Head, of fy 
5d, and for the non-fulfilm ent of the re ee 
MARK. LANE, Far. 16.—There meena 
English Adie: gia up since 2 Monday, but so the ae to-day 
to. 2s. advan as been Foi is held 15.89 
but ow spc 
ley, and Beans sell 
well, and Oats mprov ae is rine.” 
i batts oh Imperial Quarter: | & atk 
Wheat, Essex, Rost mes peas 5 ~ White =e Red bad 
——— ‘Norfolk, Lincolns! orkshire . . ‘White 6 to 70 
Barley... and distilling vant Grim pee 
Oats, Tincolnahive and Yorkshiee - » » « Polands Be “Feed 5) 
N ria As Be Scotch : F 25 Porat 28 tort 
emi Epis) 66 e fe 8, ete oe ws 22 wo 2 te 2d 
Rye stan wh ad 4 
Beans. an, 
pais ot Heligotand 
Peas, aot 
~ WEEKLY IMPERIAL AV! 
June 4 . - 
SS 
_— 13 . . 
_ 25 - . 
July im 
RK. 
St..Mary-at-hill, wine-merchant 
: Fo adilna Butterworth, Sunderland Wharf and es theoge Pi oleae ool 7 
INSOLVEN ee Luger = er cre jnoks joe 
i 
e t—J. Butte: London: leather manrbonscet i j 
money, in w! case Jones would be sent to prison, | place, Lambeth, leather factor—L. Rovins + er, Guiebura, Yorksblte: » 
merely because residuary legatees chose le a bill Oe Bo Ra ea eet peice Silane, Charing jecooeg as art i 
itr: Wibrabam The | pete ge executors He sac so espa Gate Ts a ee ora Lowmbard-etree > ill: brokere=d- | 
4G - olls, C. om 5 Harris, jun., 4 b 
ble, that the rule was that they were not to be called upon to pay | S- Daintry and.J. Ryle, Manches kers—R. Root, Wardingtat nase | 
Gvec the’ resiaue without a suit, for otherwise they would: viever || Sie ate Hi Downman, A Fe baceneschantts Copley», Dare 
be safe from font demands of ae , but would be sar ade J Satices, weuah dented: Charles-street, Grosvenor -sgares Tye Be 
their legatee ile: ww * 3 eee 
fusal to pay the 1 nis“ ay at ; “d 
licitor had merely Sedied Seuberins 4 evidence of the saahtity ee Woe - Bridd 2 echine mam | 
of the legatees as the son daughters of the George Alderson of ford. ind A. Kinnear, Glasgow,sa@ 
Bury St. Edmund’s. _ Exeentors were not bound oe ws a6f opon pre- |; SO Foo SROU RST Rs TONS oad rele ani A uocky Ay ne oal 
Freemges and here = Sereeetan ae eee ee eee ae be keeper J Miecliar and Co, Glasgow) printera—J- Geo wore Piignic 2 
been produced. ao Hy ecutor was idea ‘m8 to evid that Ro Minto; jun., Glas; aegows or Pe Lee holster kirk, it 
aeons » had resi Bury; ‘auie also | “D- Hill, Glasgow, iaeadeecare ae 
titled to an indemmni otherwi eare-pei. scone ae Willan, apes Ly ao 
cept under the direction of the Court, ‘t executors were beamed i 2108 fat the Tady Seeteate a erst 
‘On the 12th inFi uare, Mrs. es ‘con, On the 12th eee 
to pay over every farthing 4 pe Page when made parties | da Hecior- ‘street, th he indy of uior J. A - Moore, pare: 13th. ina it» 
Ww id undertake th If an executor: wére ppt stg mew fea Halket,"o te os Ei Murray;of 3. ‘con-—aAt P 
at aetisitor wen sansa seh sateen, ot make latge pay. | Guildford street; the Tady of the Rex. 7) Ba Met eon. of a 
ments without an advance? Jones was pressed with the adverse | of Mr. E. J. Smith, of 23) Dod -grove, » ie ee 
claims of residuary nes bi ee. ae not to be left Frcs & | 10th inst, at Bridge-house-place ace, Southwark pixe 2 ag Eiapiam nee 
penny to defend himself. ad imenrred the risk o: its from 2 . i, Er 
desire to save ny administering without cid airecthon ae Pyne cat jas wie a Peas. Brow nie ae 
of the Co Daly it item objected to 0. for’a journey to | ‘naujhe-tercace, Hyde-park, ‘son—A ag eae | 
Me ben where he came od find ont the beta tan es really entitled.— | F ee rARTEB oe Wai pote, inthe 
. Pemberton replied. defendant will’ on the - ca of Cambridges * 
September, 1939, at which time’tlie whole of the property | Pi Scrous pido fy oF tke’ ae vi se rtiers, M.D. eldest ere | 
(excepting furniture and money inthe house) amounting to 4501. | of tera kgenen pager a of the se Hon. acer square 
bore interest. Th: en took this money-away from. per- a prissgreg erga ae St ACESS toy, Bsa.y and 
ee ity “bearing —-. bag 3 = might have occurred to | Lord Cremorne, to Agusta, a nil, ae F4 
im that it was not right to keep it own om personal | Winchmore-hill, to Jane Stable, joaton—On the iach inst 
security not bearing: interest ; but he kept every farthing (except- | eras, C. He: Laxmonre, Baq., of Gordon-square, to Maria baer 
ing 100¢. which he paid: in discharge of debts and legacies) for | sitet daushier of Sig Yon J- Hanslor, of Ta vsti snes 
two y durinig which time it would have produced 20/. each | #,5¢ Geeree’s: Msin, eldest‘ is ad era the te Ww. 
‘year: He took it out of bearing interest; Keeping it | Henden Middlesex. ue 
‘without interest on: his own ‘si yb eing — DE rs At rot Coase eh oo conten pegs coped 
against whom, x (touse his icnevet expression Reaver eee or ‘ary borou; 
ould, if made, break his back. The whole.of yom money being mane Vee Terk inscpat hier resident: is 
‘thus, daring all this S period, improperly | kept, the @efendant, afer str ‘eet, aa eee arthina, a ome! aes 
Bing ~niese possible evasidn to avoid givingan account, and after sis bern ag 
the bili was filed. now:represented that be had placed’ 140/. in the | Hers*octebire amet Oe a er ih pean, the ee ate 
div of; ln; salicitond ty, home notonn- han was due, abyi bibicae awe Slat fear of Be im Monsees att Lat 
asly to avoid .pa\ ing. it. inte Court... if at money was to the | Esq,.im te tad year ub.his, pe Lith inst,»at area atl Ms 
cranes - the solicitor, it sO as his t, eg tobe re- ows : ah aed Sah cae ok PEs mas Siegen Saath square 
ta a te ae Sameer ea on ee | Poe 
tadiand ape oe Soe se Puinted ee ecncigae gt) Petlianed yee 
‘three weeks after ‘the will was. the Precinct af Whitetrianss rote 2 the C 
‘Boney inc his own poavesion ing no trity, and: : “BherdBi’ RavSeinemen sad Ce se Coney uate 
nein pg oe The-mbney?oasht to be ‘Baitent-Semardag Peo TNesbe Se 02 Ain hewla eret FFP 
poor persons who, from 
“Court For 
