496 THE GARDENERS CHRONI 
CLE. [N° 30, 
it was a living animal. I put it into a dish of Re and | were several cases in the registrar’s book which showed that his 
that | Lordship had acted on ° th at impression. There were also the 
cases wte Barnsley and ex parte Roberts, decided by Lord 
I might watch its movements, but was not able to taske Hardwicke under the same impression. . Rogers was content 
out what sort of a head it had. i therefore put it into a | to take the same order that had been made inex parte Sherwood. 
bottl pen, The Lord Chancellor would not suspend the working of the com- 
y 
6 
mission, but directed the Master to Aad on with the usual inquiries, 
Hassal 
Pisiigd une | and ordered Mr. 1, the friend of the lunatic, to attend and 
wire. I arp it into the aoe of Seca and it then make such cneanoeat: as he thought proper with —— to the 
beg ag took it to a medical fri iend, | future residence (or comfort.of the lunatic. The costs to be for 
d he present resi hts scat a rs mie tast er 
rig eard v. Cla ie. ‘0 discharge t ler 0 
strong magnifier. We were aa able to make out e Vice-Chancello! ee aa peor the defendant trons con- 
head dand Bet aan which i is light brown. Pe 
ice- 
tinuing to use a license to take likenesses under Sa pee inven- 
tion of Messrs. Daguerre and Niepce, which w 
Law Report last week. Our readers will pall ed 
Mr. - Sa al ade, arn 
er our 
t th at the 
History Society of Lane 
St. Swithin’s Day. the "fo llowing is given in Brand’s 
¢ agi gay gp a as the origin in of the old adage :— 
“Tf it n St. Swi ~ s Day, 
or less for rty-five su vol g days.” In the year 865, 
St. Seithin: Bishop of Wincherte, ba wtih _— _ was 
raised » Ki me} nig “pa 
by the Po He 
ees to repurchase the licens: 
As oscar but the defendant finding cap nen se 
ceeimelina, panel to resell it on the demand of the 
Vice- ropa nats sro <a eget that ‘he e was Sensi ony cy 
The wi 
aa eginn ody i ie choles: whith ren to derecho ered til th laintiff established his legal ri e inte st, 
» un fe plaim ) rs r u 
done se solemn a rocession 4 the 15th of July. It therefore, go for that purpese:to 4 cout of 1a Mt. ig » 
rained, however, so violently on that day, and for forty | pressed on his Lordship’s attention the hardship o} pelli 
days succeeding, as ha = age ae ever been known, which | the plaintiffto go to a court of law on the mere construction of a 
them ite lesign as heretical and blas- lause ina sete when there was — a Single fact to betried. It 
was a question on the meaning deed, and his client would 
phemove; arg instead, int erected a chapel over his | Foch prefer the jaecielone of the Court to that of 12 jurymen.— 
grave, at which many miracles are said to have been | The Lord Chancellor admitted there were no facts to be 
wrough' e and that the language of the deed was obscure and hardly intel- 
Antiquities. —As din diggin, ligible. His Lordship thought, however, that he could not see 
qui § aero : id his way clear without the verdict of a j 3 and, repeating his 
gault a sho rt time since in m Fe en, Isle of Ely, | opinion that there must be a trial, dissolved the injunction, with 
and had got ined ts ge at ae ae, their spades | liberty to the plaintiff to bring such action as he might be ad- 
came in con wit ard substance, > they | vised.-—On the application of Mr. Wigram, his Lordship also 
imagined i Ms -_ bean old oak ¢ many ph tll the trial Hmong a kept, the present motion standing over 
which have ser ores found in _the = wit thi =-CHANCELLOR’s CourtT.—Duke of Leedsv. Lord Amherst.— 
= feet of the is. was a motion to dissolye an injunction which had been 
. | granted ez parte during the long vacation last year, restraining 
gig vere it if be ra “ ancient canoe, bottom pop the defendants, who were the executors — sage ce of the late 
5 | Duke of “gare from selling certain 1 the family estates in 
above four fet, ‘with "rowlocks for three pairs. of oars om which were bequeathed ? to them <a the late Duke upon 
“us Tt ap) ed the late Duke, under his Ratea'e e 
* * poktheeniae was possesse: aking leases, which far 
it out. zit SnEce aed 5% close nie aa be hollowed exceeded the usual leasing powers in mariage settlements 
out fro: m the trunk of a men Se tree. There isno means of | some years ago, upon the marriage of the present Duke, a great 
how long it may have remained embedded in | deal of negotiation went on betwee es and their legal 
ee rv whether it w a for advisers as to the terms upon which the estates should be re- 
pes ie Ro ae lag wi cae jeraehwaep pues settled. The present Duke, by this i alleged that an under. 
‘ a . standi nm come to een himself and the late Duk: 
there appears to be li bt that many centuries his father, that the present Duke should on certain claims 
elapsed since its formati he had for acts of equitable waste in cutting a joe the 
late Duke ha series sag nator of whieh the late Duke 
s should agree not to e inary le: ane powers. 
e case made by the bill wa aan that th ¢ late Duke had broken this 
pte he CuAncerrY. — Dirham — Sunderland Re agreement prayed to — the ill the agreement or 
. Wawn.—This case was one of much Rinne 
The defendant, wh erm is Accra new Weber’ for South Shields, was a 
tenant in co e lands and buildings across which the 
railway. other tenants in | or twice offere 
company a long 
Plaintiffs wined ‘male The easing pi 
common of th: granted to the com wholly failed, and there was not the suchhest 
teanr or of the pr sas i which the he defendant declined to concur. 
d wpon, 
the negotiation ts 
ground for saying there gre any such ee as the 
The railway company, notwithstanding his objection, took posses- | billsuggested. It appear ere was a great deal of personal 
sion under their lease, pulled down the “houses, od laid do feeling in the matter, and grave allegations were satel t Mr. 
their railway. -The defendant then brought ejectment against the arton, the present Duke’s agent, upon ose it the 
company, but failed on hnical objection. Hethen brought | injunction had been obtained, had su, aterial 
a@second action of ejectment. 
i suppressed 
On this trial it was argued on | written documents, which would haye shown th 
‘or 
ere 
er in case of a train exon as wellas 
Perhe Court of Exchequer, homing? uch ci and 
gs aster, mut attributin; Sein es Wharton the least senta- 
o (and nothing he had heard had pce that pentenion ¥ in his 
laying the ross the site was ouster, and Mr. Wawn 
recovered judgment in ejectment for his share of the premises. | opinion), it certainly did ap Mr. Wharton had not sufficiently 
ie sheriff be: ut to execute the writ, the company filed | adverted toa variety of facts which must hav i i know- 
h 
n 
inter, St pti 
restrain the n writ the sheriff, but to rest his Honour had been led to put upon the facts which had bee; 
the defendant the iron rails of the railway. The { stated. Had he mer rieks those additional facts, he would not aave e 
Master of the Rolls granted the injunction er parte, but after- ited the injunction, which must, therefore, be dissolved with 
» On motion, dissolved it. The company appealed. It w 
on behalf of the defendant, that in: n laying do Rows’ Courr.— Fowler v. Wood.—Mr. Pemberton moved to 
held t ouster, taking them up i dissolve an injunction for restricting Sir Matthew Wood and 
the only way of recovering ession, and it equity had no | Jacob Osborne from proceeding in of replevin, and also 
jurisdiction to fe: a plain legal right. The Lord | for leave for Willi Thom: d his wife, and 
Chancellor having taken time to sider his judgment, said, | others, to ear and prosecute the action; or that one-fourth 
that it had been imtimated to him there would be no difficulty in | part of two sums paid into court on account of rent, amounting 
foming Sige an ae i a but for some feeling which existe 9267. 4s., might aid to h of them, Sir Matthew Wood 
the parti which he could not enter into on the | and Jacob — or else that the Court would di an issue 
cepaboneson ofa right a Denpesty. Mr. Hare, for bn defendant, | of devisavit vel non to try whether the property passed by the will 
Said that the latter had been always ready to act wi e utmost | of the testator, Mr. James Wood: of Glousestir. Mr. S. Sharpe, 
liberality towar wards the company, but he ertainiy atved fro for the heirs-at-law, express d his desire ne Als the Saree might be 
them an expression of their sense of the impropriety of dealin; = early as possible. it was the counsel 
with his pro in the unauthorised manner in which the engaged in the hearin; a udie ial Committee 
re also 
of the Privy Council. They pag eel to the issue. 
Lord 
to execute the lease by any proceedings in this Court. Upon the | Langdale then directed the Tariapans issués:—A trial of the issue 
bill being dismissed, and all costs at lawand in equity, as between | devisarit vel non on the two docam hich were 
solicitor and client, ‘paid to him, the defendant Wools execute the j all to con ite the will ; and seco: f the iss 
lease. The Lord Cha: magic said that, as to the apology, it was | devisavit rel non in the document B., if the first were found in th 
® Matter he could have ng to do with, but upon execution egative. Wood, Osborne, and Ch: ve to be intiffs, and 
of the lease the iaeapaey oa it to submit the other terms | the co-heirs to be defendants ; Surma bound by the trial. 
ins: upon. Th Saige Ah _— ie to the | The trial to take place at the present Gl a ir assi before a 
> giy. we 
In Re Bridge, a Lunatic. —This was : petition presented in the | miles of Gloucester. The judge to hi 
ton: for leave to traverse the finding of the jury | cir stances in pos Ata t sitting of the 
who pronounced him a M: ~ Ro = pported the | Court, the issues in th were mentioned b r. 
et etitioner was competent to manage | Sharpe, and, after some discussion, t! were. resettled ir. 
affairs, although scimewiat weak from age, wteine ie Sharpe explained the object of the Pantie io be, that on the trial 
ite of ard VI., chap. 8, by | this objection should be for heirg at lew to take,—that 
in aggrieved by an inquisi- arties claiming as de’ iad not Succe ed unless clothed 
his pleasure. The cases he executors. 
i farmers andagriculturists. e action was brought to try the 
it it was entirely | of the plaintiff to turn cattle on a certain mon, called N 
to or There: ere meena bea Mr. Ingleby, a 
in tl f prope: Clapham, the landlord of the plaintiff, and 
Lordship conid therefore look into the | Mr, Farrer, lord of the manor of near Ingleborough, in 
hi the years during the term of 30, 
by yehich | ao ai did not occur either at the commencement or 
at the rE 
clusion or personal, of eae ‘ year, 
hi —s aged ey Long kh 
: lunati tic chad n aie a, Cnet. tera 
: om 
g and they were content to | land called Bogholes, consisting of eight acres, five of whic 
ai dship on Bag oo were freehold, and the remainder t) acres copyhold, of = 
statute of Edw are ag & the snatie no manor of Newby, and for which the aunual quit-rent of 6d. w: 
the Lord Chan cellor suvw reason ioe it, ea ‘Loris Hard- le to resale I S 
wicke ior. '; and pan ays thonght Lerd ty ad there Latayed oun to = inal, "eh 7 as Sze 
a a7 
Edison —Seturday, July 24, 1641. 
to the copyhold part, and devised it to his.son, Columbus Ingle. 
by. In hel Columbus had purchased two other closes, one of a 
TSO! med Ro a amed J 
person n binson, and another of a person n: Jack. 
son, aba a 790 was admitted to the old part. Between that 
e and the year 1836 this property p hrough two other 
generations of the family, and in that ye sold by Thomas 
Ingleby, the then possessor, to Mr. F; 
eal defendant. 
The jury deliberated for a few minutes, and 
returned a verdict for the plaintiff, with nominal damages, the 
action being brought to try the right. 
MA Fripay, Juty 23.—We have had but little Eng- 
lish Market since Mo: anys and prices are 1s. to 2 
higher. Free Foreign sells at a similar improvement; the weather 
having continued unsettled all the week, with several taint 
last, and 2s. mi 
towards the ewe. and the = 
brags Lis Peas and Bean: 
s. highe: 
er. 
Wheat, ae Sees pee goa a - » White 56to 70" Rea” 
——— Norfolk, Lincolnshire and Yorkshire . +» 601068 White wae 
tle: . Pest ing ent. distilling 281034 Grind. % to 
= .incolushire and Yorkshir Polands bon ig 25 Feed 20 tos 
Broly orthumberland and Scote Fe 10 25 Potato = 
Asoc ne so lively.—Barley is in 
sale.—The Oat Trade is 
Quart 
etn Br a pete ated Potate 
Bigs ae ee te eres eh eS ees se toa 
ft Mazagan,oldandnew .« ‘ae to 40 Tick. oad Harrow 34 to 44 
pects A ego land ate Cee Winds. — to— —to— 
Peas, Whi . to37 Maple 40 to 44 wid 
WEEKLY IM ER AL AVERAGES. 
Wheat. ley. Rye. | Peas 
June UU . . 62 3 0 62 32 9/ 87 4} 39 2 
a 18 . . 62 5 3010; 2110) 3610) 38 7 38 3 
— 25 «| 68 6 te} 224 35.9) 380) 7 
uly 2 63 1) 3 11]: 22 1| 35 6} 39 3] 4n 
‘eosd 9 = 4 3 1-9) 22 2) oF 5) a8 8] Be 
_ 6415 | 32 @| 2244 | 85 2/39 5] 4 8 
6 weeks’ Aggregate Aver.|. 63 6 31 5 29 1| 3411 ‘< 6} 0.6 
Duties -| 33 6/4] 13 9! iss! we} 98 
ae ETTE OF THE WEEK. a 
INSOLV: ENTS. - dee Mayherys boarding and lodging-house-keeper, Ol 
Brompton, M 
BA RRUP CIES. SUPERSEDED, — H. Sidebotham, Hay eg Ro 
shire, eotton-manufacturer—J. Berenburg, Blomfield-street, City, tobacconist 
mee bunker, seeasiee, pe. 
bookseller—S. Hopkins, 
ey, Soca rill, peor i eter Pix, Broad- 
wes, voadler ie Gaile: "Letlendies, horse dealer—J- Copplestone, 
Plymouth, king, Beeston, Bedfordshire, Tmarkeeardenes—W- 
Le Sue, flour-dealer—J. William = Dongen, tab oe | 
Tavis, G am, grover—J. Bass, B econ, Breckn 
Boe w : -, banker— W. wwton and J. ‘hewen wtony 
silk-throwsters, Macclesfield, Cheshire —W. But peeing corn merchant, 
pein 2 draper, minories—J. Butterworth, leather-factor, 
B inghe ine-merchant, Cross-lane, City —R- 
Wes! chee Lancashite—G. bie at i jun., innkee: 2. a 
be onerae a merchant, Nine-elm: and 
imber-mi mente wee aoe ~er sei: ei 3 le Earl's Court 
See seme pimrnd lt broker, Liverpool—H. Cunliffe, shopkeepers 
peptone oidret Laneas'! 
‘COTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.—J. Crai 0 aie _ igen, Dalkeith 
inbury 
Ww, manufacturer. eta Dot tage i: an jor Canphenewes 
-sp) Powe 
Cc. ©. Depaten, Glas; 
eg xter, Nerse a= "Perthshire, d es ema 
R. Lain ‘Bong; « Renfrewshire, cotton 
Zi MA Co, Gig ow, aoe oot nanufactorers — ste = 
Euintnrah, Ppeeslieecs. F. ve “Giathany Giasgo ', fiax-merch: a " 
St gees ockbr: soar Edinburgh 
Si Vere eae sen 
hter—On the i “aes 3 "at 2, ipa 
ship-ca oat 
inst., the lad. 
gardens, Mrs. G. t, of aa ye ~ figs =e tates aoa! ats = 
J. Pigon, Esq., of a danghter—On Tuesday, 
J.T. White, Christ's Hospital, of a daughter. sucbin 
M IED—At Hill-place, Glaszow, on th = : 
beokseHler, London, t Eliza Small, Siiest: ees ‘Se mhe . aa 
Esq., W.S., Edinburgh—On Saturday, the tik inst , at St. eae crite, = 
square, Dr. Ruttledge, of Hesover-streat, ses “Anne, widow nogheeras 
Mr J. Ellis, of Prince’ nee evoeee af m the 17th inst. ran 
church, nea esbury, Martin, > ts or Shobrovah, Glowcete shite, 
Esq. 
R. Heseltine, Es: os 
oe by e Biary ebone, oe 3 Hon. P. Panes 
of Ch T,) to Elle 2, dau, of R. Mitchell, E 
streets 
et ty at Trin 
wendy cS (Grates the 
as ah 
Saaghter o of yen piace Mr. Ww. Osborne, of ‘Fulba 
ber—On S Sunday, 
fh aa atter 3 long cate 
Bea.» of Spring: grove, oe ‘Sir C- 
Tuesdsy, the 200 inst, Belg rare: crag Is is ressence, ‘No. 87, City 
gen 
yas 
of bee og 
inted by Messrs. and Evaxs, Lombard-street. 
‘is ae Be roe Whit Eee in is City of London, and Pablisin 
the Orrr eee Caantus-staezt, Covext weantahrtnbcersatdeade een 
where dvertisements and Communications are to be 
a eee 
