544 THE GARDENERS’ CHRONICLE. [N° 33, 
had ample notice of the distribution, and made no objection to it | Lords Hardwicke and Thurlow in*o ‘0 mature consideration befor 
atthetime. The Lord Chanccilormow gave judgment, and ob- | they differed from them. From that as well as other reasons his 
3 Soap} 
Ass’ sie cad athens NCE, OXxF Cir GLo 
Wood, Bart and others, v. Tho: ‘eatin facandiathen< tain ving 
beemfixed as r ti a ~ verre a be eeaaea trial, whick hea hav 
ited inter ttenti 
of the plaintiffs. It ly proved that some of the - oryorn of the lunatic ought to consider well b they nip cu da Court was iad 
plaintiffs knew of the distribution, bat there were others who did ed any further agen on bis small property, wi his — early hour cro Lay ee coursing ste ious to witness ‘the 
not; and they could not be led from seeking relief. <r iste Mr. Brid as of opinion that the jury had co proceedings. At the sitting of the Court, the list of s; jurors 
The defect of the suit was 2 rsons, who hi ight, | toa very proper cota wer ver, but seven only answered to their names. Mr, 
‘ith others o had none, e bill must, therefore, Rotis Court ‘owler. Vv med | Justice Coleridge then imposed a fin Z. upon each of the ab- 
dismissed, with costs ; but that result did not prevent the pro e order for the trial at Gloucest of =e ‘tallied settled” oe “tne sent juro ho hi een Te; y summoned, and -for whose 
parties from praying relief by a new suit. ‘ourt relative to the will of the late James Wood, and said that | non-appearance no valid excuse was offered. Mr. Kelly, for the 
Marling v..Kirby.—This was an appeal from an order of t the trial had failed of effect, as our readers will pier from the plaintiffs, then prayed a éale: this, however, Sir F. Pollock, 
Vice-Chancellor, refasing an injunction to restrain a Re say es or report of the proceedings given below under Assize Intelligence. }|-on the part of the . defendants, refused to consent; when a long 
the plaintiff’s patent, for making-solid-headed pins, and had b It was to be tried by a ial jury sammoned from places above | discussion pmeks in which nearly all the counsel both 
argued for seve: c) The Lord Chancellor, in giving fade a certain distance from Gloucester, and i stood that | were — at length, as to t ding to 
—_ rion that a perso! ed Hunt had uffic’entnumber of jurymen did not attend, either party might | ado, under these somewhat unusual 3 at the 
pray a feces. Out of the 24 summon’ d, eight only attended. It cideued. which, Mr. Justice ene proceeded to consult with 
en. sett ent it for making pins y a process 
eturning 
vour of Sir F. Pollock’s objection, and stopped the trial. Itis 
computed that the costs incurred in bringing the matter to trial 
on this screens have been little short of seventeen or eighteen 
hundred poun 
patent was cted on. 
Hunt and rekon m it, had produced a pin which was formed 
by forcing the wire to expand in a hole of the same size as the 
head of the pin. The defendant also took Hunt’s patent to a 
ire to € stea! 
MARK LANE, Fripay, Aveust 13. —— a Wednesday the market 
was i excited owing to the hea the Ladin! night, 
the wi pand, instead of crushing | and the whole expense and objec ‘ = the order e by this | and large quantities of bonded W vheat changed hands at 2s. to 35, 
it, in E 's plan. So far the and the defendant on it. advance ; yesterday and to-day the weather has been fine, and 
agreed, but the defendant clai be the inventor of an im- as always supposed that where ‘ Bipectal jury was directed by | although bonded Wheat is held ipretie firmly at the same rates, 
coved the circumstances of the case, and after an this Court, the ater, rule entitling parties to pray a tales would deman 1 her limited.—English Wheat is selling at 
tive examin of the models wings, his Lordship | prevail. The assizes for Bristol were on the 18th i sone he | Monday’s quotations.—Barley, Peas, and Beans realise the same 
came to the conclusion that there was enough in the case, as | would ask periidestinl ito give the other — fea leg cation s..—More money is asked for Oats, but not generally paid. 
presented to him, to prevent him from saying with absolute cer- | for = See to try the issues at those gm ngdale | west Ee lee Quarte A ictietan aa 
tainty that the Court would not be doing great injustice if it rmission, and appointed Thur sda me riers to hear the | ~~” Norfolk, Lincolnshir and Waieaniice i tt Stee ee ae sue 
granted an injunction to restrain the defendants at pres t fro pote cae ee ee Maltin aaa distilling 28 to34. Grind. poi 4 
using their machinery. His Lordship thought th s Meyer v. Montriow and others. ee gdale pronounced his | ts, Lincolnshire and Yorkshire res§ 22t025 Feed 20 tom 
stantial question to be tried between the parties in a court of law, | decision upon this mht heard on Saturday. The motion asked = Pigs emnee ane Bae Seotah re ved 24 to 25 Potato: Stem 
and that it would be better to say nothing of th ression on | for the payment into court of 5,300/. pean of tr non -moneys Pts Pale ae SS bit al 2 se Rap 
his respect to the merits of the case only ground | sold out by the trustees of the settlement on the marrii of John Bian ns, Mazagan,oldandnew . ‘Bait0 " Pick 33to B4to 
a h he had alowed the argument to pr d was in order | and Margaret Meyer. The settlement contained a power to change = Whe igeon, Heparaat Sie as Winds. - oe Lgnnped = we 
ascertain whether he could not at once adj st the trustees, and securities and Parte deeds were executed for sige Wier 32 a7 ; sie 38 to 42 Grey 
defendant as a violator of the plaintiff’s patent. If he could not | appointing new trustees, and by deed executed in November 1823, WEEKLY IMPERIAL wic-e AGES. 
with certainty come to the conclusion that there was a violation, | George Meyer, William Ancrum, am Montriou became Wheat. | Barley. | Rye. | Beans.; Peas 
then his Lordship thought he would be doing a t to = e fi mprised were 2,334/ nsols, | 77 - Soe eg Oo he at i na 33a} a9 8 40 11 
¢ . It had been very properly stated in the course of the all to 4,385/. Reduced, and 1,000/ AI ple icagid or u a : ak ona] et Dee 
ment that the rule of the Court ot to interfere with legal Navy F Whi ferre: to the names of these = Poa aegis at 3 H 22 9| 35 5|.39 6] @ € 
rights before a trial at law, unless it demonstrated that there trieaeee.: In 1824, part of the Reduced were sold under a power 30 +} 68 3 33 11 ss } 35 7| 40 3) 41 
iolation. Great mischief, his Lordship was sorry to say, ted to George Meyer, bythe two other trustees; in 1825 | AUSU* ©» + +| 70-5] 3% 6) 2 a * ieilied 
had been too often done by the Court not keeping in view the pie part was sold, oe = 1826 the remainder of t! educed | 6 weeks’ Aggregate Aver.) 65 4) 32 It | 35 8 siae 
sphere in which it id properly exercise its jurisdiction of a hoy sold iby M under a power executed by Ancrum be ei ae 
gran’ inj jon: Ci might be wrong in t melu- ‘on’ the sums amount to- Duties 2 8| i310} 13 9! 16 9] 1 0} 60 
sion it e to respec a copyrigh' patent, and wh poorer to apenas of ‘on 300, Oly | ut Montriou said that the whole he 
it was so it possessed no means of replacing a defendant in the | received was 1,063/. be od. ‘that he duly pa 1,0002. in 
wholesale tea-merchant. 
BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. — T.. Pickstock, 
lane, London. 
BANKRUPTS.—T. Ta: syio Royston, Hi 
ittle 
GAZETTE OF THE WEEK. 
INSOLVENT.—M. Blood, 12, North Audley-street, surgeon. 
BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED-—J. Hetherington, King’s Arms-yard, City, 
merchant, Clement's: 
ground, therefo: 5 Sag Lordship came to the conclusion, that in | 5,300/. into court. was in ~~ con - —— a | Warren and J. F. Taylor, Herm tages srret a "St Geornes TS abe 
the pases bos 4 ‘ons seeatisied s ci Tefore th F amigtoa be sarees called. fo pay. MONEY | eee aH Nelaoas love of medion: Aa ee 
tried, Tae of the plaintiff estal ar efore the an had actually c into his hands, eric was id OONS To 0632. = oh f Lec! t? ri 
Court could with ety grant an injuncti dship | 16s. 9d.,"and that the 637. 16s @. was the only sum not duly ap- see Per Wiless Tees oP eta aa en ilks! Haptice Milley Baw: 
5 pool, , Bapti q 
affirmed the order of the Vice-Chanc a r. plied. He admitted that the stock was alls g in the joint | tol, Brie ie anufacture: Last, Birmingham, general merchant—G, 
i in i ec the trustees, had been sold out for th n- | Ants DRT RNel, cements Teele ree ee ee 
tosellan, purchased in 1834 by ue vesting the proceeds in other securities yiel larger income, | Gowen tule of Wishe reer Bas he ae et ee wee 
Siaintitr and ¢ 2 ape ety Toscan The plaintitt thought | and that he had received the 1,063/. 16s, 9d., but alleged that he | ter—A. Foster, draper, water--W. Losh and J. Losh, calicosprin 
= title def e, and Rina cal an rau! the the Bevo as 4 Oo way concerned in the sales of the stock th: ry bola ——< Bins weg wigtualler, Sout Sigg er iN 
ichardson, on ie ce - | executing the power of attorney, and tha’ 0' to ton, procter, ‘orces' 
out inquiry. The present tian om r a it, | the actual sale, but that the moneys were received Beach “sconce WSEQUEST assign =a Bitow a angen bade 2 Joke 
on the ground that there was collusion him and the | Meyer, ion of his brother John Meyer. He gave a 
seller, declined to complete the sale, as the property very produce of the sale received | _BIRTHS.—On the sth inst., at rh, wife of A. L, Montgomery, 
risen much in value. The main question-was, whether a b facts should appear at the | 2:4; Commander in the Royal Navy, of 2 Gai gher—On the 7th inst, at New 
ich be supported by one s h o otherwise than at present, he (Lord Langdale) thought | Germain's-place, Blackheath, Mrs. ern Sion On Sunday, the Stk 
other concurring. The Lord Chancellor, in-giving judgment, | Mon! ould be held liable. Upon the an Montriou did | inst., at No. 1, Vernon-place, Bloomsbury-square, the lady of W. - Whyte, 
said he was of — thata — — such gar in. not admit any misapplication, he gave account | £4» of ason—On the 9th inst., Mrs. Hogard, of 5, Bath-terrace, » Cambe! 
could sustain a suit for specific no of the investments made by Meyer, but there being on! PI Babeaacors ss Bet gas ag rte Sea tte amie terms Se nwa 
jection to the ern a the bill, ie gore ee was rob opinion that his execution of the power which enabled the sale of beek. street, Ieventis he eibare, the caee a Gy tiesnt: Beis Sparrister-o- law, 
the plaintiff must a decree with a reference to the Master to | the sto nd no admission that the money was misapplied, he | of ada 
nire into the dite. (Lord Langdale) could not order him to pay into court moneys AWHIED.—On the 4th inst, at Trinity, Chapel, Rdigburgh, Sein 4 
ag Marris.—This appeal was argued in July. In the | which he had not actually received. The case of “Collis v. Collis” eat ,ueres? rat Brad mead Seidihare 9 Ave toog of 
year 1905 a Mr. Dent lenta sum of money on bond to Thomas | was not ap le, and was no antaiity Soe the ordern ked. | nan, Ayrshire. pth ints at St. Peter's, Hammersmith, W. Bayo, 
Marris, a banker at Boston, in on a Marris became | The plaintiffs farther contend that Montriou by of London, to Charlotte, only surviving daughter of the J Mr 
bankrupt in 1912, and Dent proved, under the co: ion, fora | answer to have received 2,500/., in addition to the 1,063s, 16s, fg elson-square, Great Surrey-street—-Oa the 7th inst., at 2 ee & 
sum of 13,600/., principal and interest, then due on the bond, and be first sale of stock was in October 1824, for 2. 6241. 13s.; and Strickland ee Ne eis te Os 2 aera ‘st Mi . 
carried in » that amount in the Master’s Office, under | supposing that to have been received eorge Meyer, the | Church, 8. Daniel, Esq., 3d ‘Regiment Buffs, onl ot | Bage, of 
the anthority of a decree made in 1816. Sinee that time, various or, wit permission, by John Meyer, the hi band, Heyanetone ryanstone-square, afid of Braiswick, Essex, 10 
dividends — been paid to the amount oftwenty meee in the | he advanced to Houghton 2,500/., upon the security of 3 ae d-pl ne a vat ie teggtond tar a Ni hot at the Dirk 
and on th 1 debt. In 1840, the Master macie his report, | licies of assurance, and the deposit of the lease of a hose ta | Cane oe mers Boke “sana, v Marylebone, L. Frederich. G. Vou 
and in Scag One dividends due to Mr. Dent, he first calculated s Yard. Mon’ stated he unable to set forth — Hohenstein, of his Pruss eo ie asent 3 13th Regimen a 
the sum due for interest, and then appropriated the surplus to the Z. eins pote of th st- hon cae ree, we Daee Maria, hn oe 7 eas ae mat the slate iad 
reduction of the principal. Exceptions were taken to fund ; but Houghton died, his execuhors received 2,000/. due upon Ea net 1 afeaees D Bane indies, egg | 
cellor allowed declaring that the account | one of the policies, and sold th@Measchold house for 500/.| _ DIED.—On the 2d Feb., at his residence Lodge, near Sydney, New 
had not been takenin the usual manner, beeause by the mode in ent; Jeremiah Houghton was one of his | South Wales, axed «3, J-'J. Gregory, Es EN ‘foun som of the iste W. 
which the appropriations were made, there was a sum now due ecutors, and creditor, and it was agreed that only 10007. | Gre#ory,,Esa—On the Ist inst, at ” Northiam, B. ‘W. Brows, Ee-2 aed Te 
See ie, eens rater Seitnes Se the pooest eight coductinns of the S00), debt., bat thas tue | CRIS carted Sota nes meena ty ot 
berg ag eyes if another mode of calculation had been | remainder should be a charge upon the oth and him 2—On th vi “s me Fart yy Great st amore Elizabeth 
adopted pag dr & we gnome, vert ee Chan. | 1,0092: was paid to John Meyer, the husband. ‘There wa Fas By downto 5 os ively in the Sist year oF he Vifegaee pis 
dem observ: fe ie existence t e 500 e Wi , ors! ly ts, o! Saari shy ag Mi ‘atherine id 
@ surplus in a bankrupt y the ent of twenty shil- ane chon but coaiieceas th 4 ecntetin: eetabe ts veg cond de pre “ bs ie i rs ake Bigige oad 
igs inthe pound, was not of cecurrence, the in his hands licitor for John Meye po iota h E wife of T.W F vara Tan On the 7th inst. rae Sunuing-bi 
case before him would be a very tone. The appropria- | (Lord gdale) could not come to the concli dees os cep . her ner age, Katherine Platt, of St. Ands Seraplace, Regents 
de yy es Ta usc ins Ben uch eee Pe Blarney be Bog Statute 6 | clearly trust-money misapplied as to order it to be brought into ek mgs 
» TV., c. 2, on, Octo 
sufficient in bat toregubate tiie e Case without rth other authority included in the sor notion The — oe ee roe aaehl not INDEX OF THE FR ENUIE SE | HOREICUET ONAL: ‘SUBJECTS 
Fea hoespee end: rage bypatdiogt a8 oor i the payment into court of the 630. 16s. Qd. A os ii = - 518 na] ‘Tren ium dent tam as at 
case of Bro! v — > = i ‘Amber, new e + 6 Shee : 
1 Atk. 75, hed been modified by what was donein esparte Hisein. brought by the plaintii Scovlemen hi Waltahie: againet tae aes | “Eceae oo Meenas siete ~ ase 
botham, 2G. and J. 123. His Lordship said he had directed in- | fendant, an extensive farmer in Hampshire, to recover the value ‘Repay Ww ieiearen plats ties aleions » sent for $ 
quiries to he made on the subject of the practice, but the cases | of a gr: d turnip seed the of six sacks, | Bees, dru Roerp ee Mildew in Peach-trees, its cure aa 
where a surplus arose were of such rare occurrence that the in- | George Jeffreys proved, that he was in the employ of the plaintif | Bisi: Ada™- Gladiotas pt; 9.5 Mushroomt-epawn, Se pritish 
quiry pr no sa ny, result. Tt hnad been contended | and delivered the goods to defendant. | He also delivered 201b. of Sees ae sing Spee oie fA ED 
at the practice was also altered by what lacein Devaynesv. | tap- and 20ib. of white globe seed to him. een — é ¢ own in °| Norwood for Pine-apples $1 
an 7 ea his Lc grec ne se made no alteration. | seed was 10d. Ib., and the other two Is. 1d. ‘a ply to ee a ae seater ben cael Pie em me ag 
ar 4 e referred to, held thatthe interest | question if he knew why the green round is charged less for ies > yaya i oa - propa: i, oe 
wwas referable to the orizinal debt, so longas that remained wndis. | theother seeds, witness said, to the great amusement of thecourt, Goal eu ema iw gam apg how raised. Sb 
charged. But the principle itself was older than the time o! that he only knew tap and white globe were always dearer, and | Cottage Gardens, No. XXIX. . 5164] Plant as up without oy 
Hardwicke, and derived from the civil There was, there. | that green round was alwayscheaper. He then proceeded, in deti- tagers, plants cultivased by | SIG ¢ |. Oe cniaseh nee BER 
fore, nothing to supporta contrary opinion, except horton of ex- | ance ofthe remonstrances of the learned counsel, to detail the wash- Gareent inse uae ae: pig Reizate Co Cottage. ‘Gardeners’ Soc- 5154 
parte Higginbotham ; and his Lordship was of opinion, both on | ing, the breakfasting, the dressing, the walking, the ing and the Dahliag, prize, ‘ en Lape Beret, treatment of sae, me 
. Principle and authority, that the mode of cnet! idopend she drinki defendant and hims he call im for wok Sa nee s villa, after bloomin, soe 
the Master was the proper one, and that the — of the Vice- | payment of the account, and t erri- - = oer Be Soa aie mi with donnie 
Chancellor, allowing the exceptions, must be o t. For the defence it was contended that defendant ordered Eotleadram ee at lores cs chee 
Wood +, Lamburth.—This was a bill for oe s a sack of green round ip seed of the plaintiff fi syth's improvements of . > giza| Salvias, treatment when ialeen sie 
contract for the purchase of copyhold property from | of planting it for the use of his sheep during the winter ; that the Facheies, mag Soe pening... BEES from the tices eee 
of a bankrupt. The sotonn abjected to the at of ating the order, sent him a mixture o! Sates ars dpm nay eee Shetioid Fir $nd Hort. Bxbi- mi 
Was no! eeds, * bea . * 
from the claim of the wife of the bankrupt to take dower. The | in dari ; Oe cee ws Aon anal toes t de. oon age eae oe gout beet ames Se: : at 
and exceptions were taken | fendant to le expense na inetevents i: fe was | Honey-dew, itsorigin = - ae Stamiord se cecionck <> me | 
Chancelior, who was of | compelled-to send ont his sheep during the bad weather: ‘an Se oes ae Suaw meray beds, Ubeht ABOET sop g 
ie ought to be confirmed. The | the damage a by him was ter than the value of the ble-Bees Rot in: is to Tne 
abs Lort Chancellor now said that | seeds supplied, i was contended that the plaintiff must me 5 creme oe » gate eee fash: Hen sie pe = 
further consideration, he —_ still of | suited. Defendant’s groom deposed that he received the si 2 icolorum, to Strike 
at a good title had been made ‘ Teatian Selentife Association . S196 a sab 
ridge, t = aati. This made by the assignee the plaintiff's servant, and kept it locked ‘up until Kleinia a suitable for - Ons 
the og of thie fury spon soplication for leave to | eut to be by the agricuitural labourers. It did not get sp eS — iota are ~ 
bn é w=. 4 eargu- ed at defendant's. Beingasked if any turnip sown stam, species of = resthouse = 0 
wand VE. to ce ae tt "as pound; ther she: statute of the 2 i fi in the previous year, witness stared at ¢ Limerick Prada a s40f — —— South Let: + 
The Lord ba g bts ae hee the that it had no diseretion. counsel, and rubbed the cuff - his coat over his mouth | Liquid manure, to:prepare S2t b{ _ don Flor. Soe. in”. 
The Lord Chancellor obserred ‘opinions of his predeces- | several times. The counsel told him that-he had better scrately | Loam, substitute for. BL boating ae ae 
sors on the point were conficting. Torts Wartwiekeand ‘Thur: (hie head. ‘The -witness accordinely beam ¢0 scratch his head | “dea rgriation,canae of fs eee: : 
n ti ion that grt rg che mac mage eduatrionsly nce, sccorinely bee He, however, ee ee, 
j s Ros Eldon thought that thet : is w ss ee ide Lamberderect, Flee . 
rete ac coud uot ve retaed. Minka aie | Say stats ace GO con Pin ie te Cann | se icine Wien aay nia ane aie 
u : examination ‘in the County of 
self bound to fallow the judzments of Lords Rosslyn tad Eisen, several other witnesses in of the defence, the jury re- | Se Or"5® 3,0 th emencs and erie: Sain Conny jrensed to OF 
Because it was to be presumed that they took the decisions of | tamed & verdict for the © plaintist—Damages 18 : de veering, Augsat 1 1 are.to. 
