76 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 
noticed that in one species, H. giganteus, the cross-section is slightly 
asymmetrical. Whether this is due to accidental deformation, or is in- 
dicative of a paired series referable to the upper jaw, there are at present 
no means of determining. Campodus is the only genus in which the 
teeth exhibit marks of contact with opposing series. 
Information regarding the mode of growth in Edestus is afforded by 
the detached segments of ZH. heinrichi and EH. minor’ which are known. 
Successional teeth are formed in the same way as in Campyloprion and 
Helicoprion, the only difference being that the bases of the newer formed 
segments ensheathe the older to a much greater extent. The first- 
formed or ‘terminal segment” of 4. heinrichi is not a “solid bone,” as 
stated by Newberry,’ but possesses a gouge-like base the same as the 
Fie. +i; 
Edestus heinrichi N. & W. Coal Measures; Carlinville, Illinois. Series of seg- 
ments belonging to a single individual. X 3. 
rest. In the specimen figured by him as a supposed terminal segment, 
only the “ denticle” [crown] is preserved, and the carbonaceous matrix 
which originally filled the interior of the sheath might readily be mis- 
taken at first sight for “bone” or vasodentine. In text-figure 7 are 
shown several segments belonging to a single individual of #. heinriche, 
in which the mode of succession is clearly discernible. The original, 
which forms part of the A. H. Worthen Collection in the Museum of 
Comparative Zoology, is from the Coal Measures (“roof of no. 5 coal ”’) 
at Carlinville, Illinois. The segments fit snugly into one another in 
their natural position, but are shown slightly separated in the drawing. 
Associated with this specimen either naturally or accidentally was a 
fragmentary fin-spine of Ctenacanthus having a very coarse ornamenta- 
1 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. IV., 1888, p. 120, Plate V., Figure 2a — Monogr. 
U.S. Geol. Surv., Vol. XVI. (1889), p. 223, Plate XXXIX., Figure 2a. 
I 
) 
; 
7 
