472 JOURNAL, BOMBAY NATURAL HIST, SOCIETY, Vol, XXVIII 
SPINDASIS, -- Wallgn. Rhop. Caffr. p. 45. 1857. 8.8. natalensis, 
Dbl. & 
Hew. 
(masili- 
Salt kasi). 
STRYMON, Hiibner. Zutrage Ex. Sehaiett 1818. S.S. melinus, 
p. 22. Hiibn. 
The date of Hitbner’ s use of the name in ae Verz. bek. Schmett, p. 74, is appa- 
rently much later, about 1822-3. 
SUASA, deN. Butt. Ind. TL, p. 1890. T.S. lisides, 
386. Hew. 
SURENDRA, ; Moore. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1878. 8. S. querceto- 
Lond. p. 835. rum, 
; Moore. 
TAJURIA, Moore. Lep. Ceylon, I, p. 1881. T. 8. cippus, 
a: 108. Fab. 
(longi- 
: NUS). 
THADUKA, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1878. S. S. multicau- 
Lond. p. 836. data, 
Moore. 
THAMALA, ‘Moore. Proce. Zool. Soe. 1878: 8.8. miniata, 
Lond. p. 834. Moore. 
THECLA, Fab. Mlliger’s Mag. VI, 1807. betule, 
p. 286. Linn. 
Fabricius set up the genus for betula, spini and quercus. Swainson (Zool. 
Ill. I, 2, p. 69, 1821-2) specified betule as the type. This action was perfectly 
consistent with the treatment of the genus by previous authors and was confirmed 
by the action of Curtis (1829) and Westwood (1840),Scudder (J. c. p. 280) specified 
spini as the type, labouring under the fallacy that because Zephyrus had been 
set up by Dalman in 1816 with betulw as the type, that species was no longer 
available. This fallacy runs throughout, and sadly spoils his otherwise excellent 
work on the Genera of Butterflies. Betule must be taken as the type. 
TICHERRA, DeN. Proe. Zool. Soe. 1887. T. S. acte, Moore. 
Lond. p. 457. 
USSURIANA, Tutt. Brit. Lep. IX.p. 1908. T.8. michelis. 
276. Oberth. 
UTICA, Hew. Ill. Diurn. Lep. 1865. 8.8. onycha, 
p. 56. Hew. 
Unfortunately pre-occupied in Crustacea, 1847. 
VADEBRA, Moore. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1883. T. 8. petosiris, 
Lond. p. 528. Hew. 
VIRACHOLA, Moore. Lep. Ceylon, I, p. 1881. T.S. perse, Hew. 
; 104. 
YASODA, Doh. Journ. As. Soc. 1889. pita, Horst. 
Beng. p. 410. 
Doherty did not refer any species to the genus although he gave a brief diag- 
nosis of it. Dé Niceville adopted it from Doherty in his Butterflies of India, 
III, p. 438 (1890) and specified pita.as the type. 
ZELTUS, deN. Butt. Ind. II, p. 1890. T. 8S. etolus, Fab. 
399. 
ZEPHYRIUS, — Billb. Enum. Ins. p. 80. 1820. 
A misspelling of Zephyrus, of which it is an absolute synonym. 
ZEPHYRUS, Dalman. Vetensk. Akad. 1816. T. S. betule., 
Handl. XX XVII, Linn. 
p. 62. 
