N0 . 12 JAW OF PILTDOWN MAN — MILLER 2.J 



Puccioni, Neixo. Morphologie du maxillaire inferieur. L' Anthropologic, 

 vol. 25, pp. 291-321, figs. 1-3. IQI4- 



Reaffirms view that Piltdown mandible is less simian than Smith 

 Woodward makes it appear (p. 315). 

 Pycraft, W. P. The most ancient inhabitant of England: the newly-found 

 Sussex Man. Illustrated London News, vol. 141, P- 958. December 28, 

 1912. 

 Pycraft, W. P. Ape-Man or Modern Man? The two Piltdown skull 

 reconstructions. The case for Dr. A. Smith Woodward's reconstruction. 

 Illustrated London News, vol. 14.3, P- 282. August 23, 1913. Four figures. 

 "But no one competent to express an opinion would accept this 

 interpretation [that skull is man and jaw ape]." 

 Robinson, Louis. The Story of the Chin. Knowledge n. s., vol. 10, pp. 4™- 

 420. November, 1913. (Reprinted in Smithsonian Report for 1914, pp. 

 599-609, pis. 1-12, 1915.) 



Piltdown jaw (symphyseal region) figured (pi. 7) but not mentioned 

 in the text. 

 Schwalbe, G. Kritische Besprechung von Boule's Werk : " L'Homme f ossile 

 de la Chapelle-aux-Saints." Zeitschr. fur Morphologie und Anthro- 

 pologic, vol. 16, pp. 227-610. January 31, 1914- 



Piltdown skull and jaw, pp. 603-4. Not willing to accept the suggestion 



that skull and jaw did not belong to one individual, but considers the 



facts too uncertain to form basis of positive opinion. 



Shattock, S. G. Morbid thickening of the calvaria; and the reconstruction 



of bone once abnormal ; a pathological basis for the study of the thickening 



observed in certain pleistocene crania. Seventeenth International Congress 



of Medicine, London, 191 3, sect. 3, pt. 2, pp. 3-46, pis. 1-4, text figs. 1-3. 



1914. 



Piltdown skull, pp. 42-46. " But to conclude. Without making any 

 dogmatic statement, certain details of the Piltdown calvaria suggest the 

 possibility of a pathological process having underlain the thickened con- 

 dition" (p. 46). Accepts association of skull with jaw, and regards the 

 third lower molar as'unerupted (p. 43)- See Underwood, December 

 31, 1913- 

 Smith, G. Elliot. Appendix [to paper by Dawson and Woodward]. Abstr. 

 Proc. Geol. Soc. London, session 1912-13, P- 22. December 28, 1912. 



Abstract of paper mentioned under next title. The^last paragraph 

 of abstract does not occur in full account. It is: "There are no 

 grounds whatever for supposing that this simian jaw and human brain- 

 cast did not belong to one and the same individual, who was probably 

 a right-handed female." 

 Smith, Grafton Elliot. Preliminary report on the cranial cast [of the 

 Piltdown skull]. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 69, pp. 145-147- 

 March, 1913. Issued April 25, 1913- 

 Smith, G. Elliot. The Piltdown Skull. Nature, vol. 92, p. 131. October 



2, 1913. 



Accepts association of skull with jaw and adds: "The small and 

 archaic brain and thick skull are undoubtedly human in character, but 

 the mandible, in spite of the human molars it bears, is more simian 

 than human. So far from being an impossible combination of char- 

 acters, this association of brain and simian features is precisely what 

 I anticipated in my address to the British Association at Dundee 

 (Nature, September 26, 1912, p. 125), some months before I knew _ of 

 the existence of the Piltdown skull, when I argued that in the evolution 

 of man the development of the brain must have led the way. The 



