NO. 12 JAW OF PILTDOWN MAN — MILLER 20, 



Underwood, Arthur S. The Piltdown Skull. British Journal of Dental 

 Science, vol. 56, pp. 650-652, 3 plates (not numbered). October 1, 1913. 

 Accepts association of skull with jaw, but shows by means of radio- 

 graphs the exact similarity of the jaw to that of a chimpanzee. Does 

 not especially discuss the characters of the molars. 



Underwood, A. S. [Discussion of " Supplementary Note " on Piltdown skull.] 

 Abstr. Proc. Geol. Soc. London, session 1913-14, pp. 30-31. December 

 31, 1913. (See also Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 70, p. 99. April 



25, I9I4-) 



" The sockets of the third molar were not those of an erupting tooth, 

 the roots had been quite completed, and the tooth was in its final 

 position at death." (See Keith, December 31, 19 13.) 



Vram, U. G. Le reconstruzioni dell' Eoanthropus Dawsoni, Woodward. 

 Boll. Soc. Zool. Ital., Roma, ser. 3, vol. 2, pp. 195-198. 1913. 



Accepts association of jaw with skull, but considers that a new 



species should not have been based on such incomplete material. 



Walkhoef, Dr. Entstehung und Verlauf der phylogenetischen Umformung 



der mensclichen Kiefer seit dem Tertiar und ihre Bedeutung fur die 



Pathologie der Zahne. Deutsche Monatsschr. fur Zahnheilkunde, vol. 



31, pp. 947-979, figs. 1-9. December, 1913. 



Piltdown jaw, pp. 971-979. Accepts association of skull and jaw. 

 Regards the jaw as a confirmation of his views on the origin of the chin. 

 " Das Kieferbruchstuck von Piltdown wird damit zu einem neuen, sehr 

 wichtigen Beweise fiir meine Theorie der Kinnbildung, nach welcher 

 eine Reduktion des gesammten Kiefers, insbesondere aber des Kiefer- 

 korpers in dorsaler Richtung stattfand mit Ausnahme der vorderen 

 Basalpartie, welche unter dem Einfluss der Muskeln steht, die bei der 

 artikulierten Sprache tatig sind" (p. 974). 



Waterston, Prof. [Discussion of the Piltdown skull.] Abstr. Proc. Geol. 

 Soc. London, session 1912-13, p. 25. December 28, 1912. (See also Quart. 

 Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 69, p. 150. March, 1913. Issued April 

 25. 1913.) 



Very difficult to believe that the two specimens could have come from 

 the same individual. 



Waterston, David. The Piltdown Mandible. Nature, vol. 92, p. 319, figs. 1-3. 

 November 13, 1913. 



Compares with chimpanzee and concludes that " .... it seems to 

 me to be as inconsequent to refer the mandible and the cranium to the 

 same individual as it would be to articulate a chimpanzee foot with 

 the bones of an essentially human thigh and leg." 



Woodward, A. Smith. The Piltdown Skull. Brit. Med. Journ., vol. 2 for 

 I 9 I 3> P- 762. September 20, 1913. 



Abstract of lecture before the British Association at Birmingham on 

 September 16. Announcement of discovery of canine tooth (see also 

 next title). " As to the question whether the ape-like mandible belonged 

 to the skull, it could only be said that its molar teeth were typically 

 human, its muscle markings such as might be expected, and that it 

 was found in the gravel near the skull." " The Piltdown man might 

 .... well have been the direct ancestor of modern man, connecting 

 him with the undiscovered tertiary apes, whose rounded skulls must 

 have resembled those of the immature young of existing apes." 



