NOTES OK BUTTERFLIES FROM THE NAG A HILLS. 59 



102. Euthalia lepidea, Butler. — Fairlj'- common at the foot of the hills 

 throughout the year. 



103. Euthalia appiades, Menetrics. — A few specimens taken at the foot 

 of the hills in Febrviary, March and Kovember. 



104. Euthalia jahnu, Moore. — Obtained by Mr. Doherty in the Xaga Hills. 



105. Euthalia kesava, Moore. — A few specimens taken at the foot of the 

 hills, April to July. 



106. Euthalia lubentina, Cramer. — Two females taken in April and a male 

 in August at 1,700 ft. 



107. Euthalia franciae, Race attenuata, n. — Under the above name I 

 propose separating the Eastern race of E. francw, from the Khasia and 

 Xaga Hills, from the typical form occurring in Sikhim and Bhutan. It 

 can easily be distinguished by its much darker colour and by the bands 

 being very much narrower ; in only one specimen that I ha\'e seen is it as 

 broad. The colour of the discal band is very variable ; in many specimens 

 there is a tendency for the spot to become white and in some specimens 

 the bands are entirely white. This form is not uncommon at 5,000 — 6,000 

 ft. from August to October. 



108. EuVndA\2L9hBmms, Duubleday. — Occurs at the foot of the hills, a few 

 specimens taken in June, August and October. 



109. Euthalia teichinia, Menetries. — A single female taken at Gaspani, 

 1.700 ft., in July. 



110. Euthalia garuda, Moore. — Xot common probably from the absence of 

 its food plant. A single male taken at the foot of the Hills in August is 

 much darker than any specimen I have seen and has the white discal spots 

 very small, the spot in interspace 4 being wanting. 



111. Euthaiaa jama, Felder. — A single male taken at the foot of the 

 hills in March which is smaller than specimens in my collection from 

 Bhutan and the Khasia Hills being only 2*41 inches in expanse. The 

 markings on the underside are very pale and the white streaks hardly 

 visible. 



112. Euthalia apicalis, VoUenhoven . — A male taken at the foot of the hills 

 in March and a female in June. The male agrees with the figure of E. 

 eriphyk de N. as figured in Lep. Ind. iii, pi. 238, (2) and the female agrees 

 with the figure of E. apicalis, Lep. Ind. iii, pi. 239, (lb.) except that the 

 discal spots are longer. I have placed both under E. apicalis following 

 Bingham who considers E. eripkt/le de N. to be same as this species. 



113. Parthenos ganibrisi}is, Fabr. — Fairly common at the foot of the hills. 

 The males of the spring brood have the apices very white, whilst in the 

 summer broods there is only a trace of this as if the wings had been 

 slightly rubbed. 



114. Moduza procris, Cramer. — Common througlioiit the year at low 

 elevations. 



