DESCRIPTIONS OF SPECIES. 95 



Sterculia sp. 

 PI. XXXIV, figs. 18, 19. 

 Sterculia sp.? Hollick, Annals New York Acad. Sci., vol. 11, 1898, p. 422, pi. 37, fig. 5. 



These fragments apparently represent lobes of some narrow-leaved Sterculia, 

 similar to S. luguhris Lesq. " 



Locality: Gay Head, Marthas Vineyard, PI. XXXIV, fig. 18. Collected by 

 David White. Specimen in U. S. Nat. Mus. 



Tottenville, Staten Island, PI. XXXIV, fig. 19. Collected by Arthur Hollick. 

 Specimen in Mus. Staten Island Assn. Arts and Sci. 



Pterospermites modestus Lesquereux. 

 PI. XXXVIII, fig. 8. 

 Pterospermites modestus Lesq., Mon. U. S. Geol. Survey, vol. 17 (Fl. Dak. Or.), 1892, p. 186, pi. .58, fig. .5; 

 Hollick, Annals New York Acad. Sci., vol. 11, 1898, p. 422, pi. 37, fig. 6. 

 There can hardly be any question that our specimen is identical with this species 

 as described and figured by Lesquereux from the Dakota group, but it may also be 

 compared with Apeihopsis thomseniana Keer'' hom the lower Atane beds of Green- 

 land, and the question whether or not these two species should be regarded as dis- 

 tinct is largely one of personal choice. 



Locality: Tottenville, Staten Island. Collected by Arthur Hollick. Specimen 

 in Mus. Staten Island Assn. Arts and Sci. 



Order MYRTALES. 

 Family MYRTACE.E. . 

 Eucalyptus? nervosa Newberry. 

 PI. VIII, fig. 6b; PI. XXXV, fig. 16. 

 Eucalyptus? nervosa Newb., Mon. U. S. Geol. Survey, vol. 26 (Fl. Araboy Clays), 1895 (1896), p. 112, pi. 32, 

 figs. 3-5, 8; Hollick, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, vol. 21, 1894, p. 56, pi. 174, fig. 10. 

 These fragments are manifestly not satisfactory subjects for identification, but 

 theyrepresent'portions of linear leaves apparently identical with Newberry's species, 

 as may be seen by comparison with his figures (loc. cit.). 



Locality: Black Rock Point, Block Island, PI. VIII, fig. 6b. Collected by 

 Arthur Hollick. 



Sea Cliff, Long Island, PI. XXXV, fig. 16. Collected by Gilbert Van Ingen. 

 Specimen in Mus. New York Bot. Gard. 



Eucalyptus? angustifollv. Newberry. 



PI. XXXV, figs. 9, 14, 15. 



Eucalyptusfangustvfoliam^\,.,UoTi.V. S.Geol. Suivey, vol. 26 (Fl. Amboy Clays), 1895 (1896), p. HI, pi. 32, 



figs. 1, 6, 7; Hollick, Bull. New York Bot. Gard., vol. 3, 1904, p. 408, pi. 70, figs. 8, 9. 

 Eucalyptus Geinitzi Heer [?]. Beriy, Bull. New York Bot. Gard., vol. 3, 1903, p. 87, pi. 53, fig. 3. 



In grouping these figures of apparently widely different forms under the one 

 specific name I have followed Newberry in Ms treatment of the species (loc. cIl.). 



oCret. and Tert. FL, 1883, p. 81, pi. 6, figs. 1-3. 



6 Fl. Foss. Arct., vol. 6, {abth. 2), 18S2, p. 95, pi. E6, fig. .5. 



