80 JOURNAL, BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY, Vol. XIII. 
781. &. exusta, Butl. 
Sikhim, I do not know this species. (A single specimen from 
Miller’s collection is so named by Sir George Hampson.—Z. J. L.) 
782. R. emblicalis, Moore. 
Sikhim ; Bhutan, 2,500 feet. I have only obtained this on two 
occasions. A specimen in my collection was taken at light in July, 
Dr. Pilcher obtained it at 2,000 feet in October. 
782a. R. furcifer, Ampsn., Jour. Bo. Nat. His. Soc. (ined.) 
Sikhim, 1,800 feet. Two specimens taken at Punkabaree at light in 
June. Sir George Hampson says that the specimen I sent him for 
examination is exactly similar to ones from Bhutan, Bali, and Queens- 
land, in the British Museum collection. 
786. R. reticulata, Moore. 
Sikhim and Bhutan, 2,000--7,000 feet. This is a common species, 
especially at the higher elevations. It is extremely variable in the 
markings of the forewing. My specimens were obtained at light in 
May, June, and August. (I took this at Darjeeling in July. Two 
specimens ex. coll, Moller named eatensa, Warr., 2 name which 
I do not find in Sir G. Hampson’s catalogue, seem to be differ t.—- 
Hed: 
787. &. fasciata, Moore. 
Sikhim. I do not know this. Notin British Museum. (A single 
specimen from Méller in my collection was so identified by Snellen 
and agrees fairly well with Moore’s figure.—H. J. E.) 
789, FR. alternata, Moore. 
Sikhim (Atkinson). I have not seen a specimen. (I have two which 
agree with the types in Moore's collection —Z. J. E.) 
790. &. oligosticha, Umpsn. 
Sikhim. I cannot make out this species, though what I have identi- 
fied as Ft. subcostalis may be referable to it. (1 have only one speci- 
men of this, the type not in perfect condition. I think it may bea 
variety of the last or perhaps of the next which I have only from 
the Khasias. Anyhow, these :hree species seem very nearly allied. 
Hi. J. H.) 
791. A. subcostalis, Hmpsn. 
Sikhim. I have one specimen taken in June, which I think may be 
this species, 
